M. Heidegger’s philosophy and legal thought (remarks on the review of A. V. Stovba’s article “Does the theory of law need M. Heidegger’s ideas?” Made by professor N. V. Razuvaev)

  • Aleksey Vyacheslavovich Stovba The Yaroslav the Wise National Law University (Kharkiv, Ukraine)

Abstract

The following article is the author’s answer towards the critical remarks of professor N. V. Razuvaev about the polemic between A. V. Polyakov and A. V. Stovba. In this paper A. V. Stovba gives his objections to the critics of the Russian legal scientist and also presents the main features of his own philosophy of law called “temporal legal ontology” which is the basis for views argued by A. V. Polyakov and A. V. Stovba. Moreover, the article includes some general reflections on the interrelation between the theory of law and the philosophy of law, subject and methodology of fundamental jurisprudence, the role of the general philosophy for the theory of law and the philosophy of law. Answering the critics of N. V. Razuvaev, A. V. Stovba resorts to various achievements of the philosophical thought: phenomenology (including responsive one), existentialism, fundamental ontology, ethics of the Other (E. Levinas) etc. The main feature of the temporal legal ontology developed by the Ukrainian legal scientist is the focus on the Legal Being, which is conceived from the horizon of the legal time. Thus, the law is conceived not as an entity — an idea, a norm, a statute etc., but rather as a being of this entity which makes it legal. Viewed from this perspective, the law is represented as a kind of a traction emerging at the moment of making a deed conforming to the law and attracting legal consequence to it. In its turn, it leads to rethinking of the key problem — normative character of law. The latter acts not as a feature of the legal entity (prescribe a certain conduct to a legal subject), but rather as a means of Law Being itself. As an origin of Law Being, A. V. Stovba suggests recourse to a special — legal — event without which the entire array of the legal entity will be dead and stagnant. Thus, the approach of the Ukrainian scientist belongs to the so-called “dynamic understanding of law” which is being developed rapidly in the contemporary legal philosophy.

Keywords:

law, temporal legal ontology, being of law, legal entity, legal being

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Aleksey Vyacheslavovich Stovba , The Yaroslav the Wise National Law University (Kharkiv, Ukraine)

candidate of legal sciences, doctoral student of the department of Philosophy

References

Waldenfels B. Topografіia Chuzhogo. Studії do fenomenologії Chuzhogo [Topography of the Foreign. The Studies towards the Phenomenology of the Foreign]. Kyiv, PPS, 2002. 206 p. (In Ukrainian)

Gadamer H.-G. Іstina і metod: v 4 t. T. 1: Germenevtika I: Osnovi fіlosof. germenevtiki [The Truth and the Method. In 4 vol. Vol. 1 Hermeneutics I: The Foundations of the Philosophical Hermeneutics]. Kyiv, Univers, 2000. 464 p. (In Ukrainian)

Kaufmann A. Ontologicheskaia struktura prava [The Ontological Structure of Law]. Russian Yearbook of the Theory of Law, 2008, no. 1, pp. 151–175. (In Russian)

Levinas E. [Philosophy, Justice and Love]. Levinas E. Total’nost’ i beskonechnoe [Levinas E. Totality and Infinity]. Moscow, Modern, 2013, pp. 356–364. (In Russian)

Maihofer W. Recht und Sein. Prolegomena zu einer Rechtsontologie. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1954. 125 p.

Nevvagay I.d. [Normogenesis in the Process of the Communication]. Problemy metodologii i filosofii prava [Issues of the Methodology and Philosophy of Law]. Samara, Samar. humanit. acad., 2015, pp. 38–50. (In Russian)

Neklassicheskaia filosofiia prava: voprosy i otvety. Kollektivnaia monografiia [Non-classic Philosophy of Law: Questions and Answers. Collective monograph]. Ed. A. V. Stovba. Kharkov, 2013. 272 p. (In Russian)

Polyakov A.V. Nuzhdaetsia li teoriia prava v ideiakh M.Khaideggera? [Does the Theory of Law need Ideas of M.Heidegger?] Pravovedenie, 2013, no.4, pp.6–11. (In Russian)

Raynach A. Apriornye osnovaniia grazhdanskogo prava [Apriori Foundations of the Civil Law]. Мoscow, House of intellectual book, 2001, pp. 153–327. (In Russian)

Razuvaev N. V. Filosofiia M. Khaideggera i postklassicheskaia teoriia prava. Retsenziia na stat’iu Stovby A. V. «Nuzhdaetsia li teoriia prava v ideiakh M. Khaideggera? (otvet na polemicheskie zamechaniia prof. A. V. Poliakova)» [Philosophy of M. Heidegger and Post- classic Theory of Law. Remarks on the article of A. V. Stovba “Does the Theory of Law need Ideas of M.Heidegger? (the Response to the Polemic Remarks of prof. A.V.Polyakov)”] Pravovedenie, 2015, no. 2, pp. 211–219. (In Russian)

Ricoeur P. Pravo і spravedlivіst’ [The Law and The Justice]. Kiev, Spirit and Litera, 2002. 216 p. (In Ukrainian)

Stovba A. V. O peremene sushchnosti, ili «Chto est’» pravo v epokhu postmetafiziki [On Change of the Essence or “What is” Law in the Époque of the Post-metaphysics]. Pravovedenie, 2008, no. 1, pp. 157–164. (In Russian)

Fechner E. Filosofiia prava [The Philosophy of Law]. Rossiiskii ezhegodnik teorii prava [Russian Yearbook of the Theory of Law], 2010, no.3, pp.539–612. (In Russian)

Heidegger M. Bytie i vremia [Being and Time]. Мoscow, Ad Marginem, 1997. 452 p. (In Russian)

Heidegger M. Vremia i bytie [Time and Being]. Мoscow, Respublica, 1993. 447 p. (In Russian)

Heidegger M. Osnovnye problemy fenomenologii [The Basic Issues of the Phenomenology]. Saint Petersburg. Higher religious-philosophical school, 2001. 446 p. (In Russian)

Ben-dor O. Thinking about Law. In Silence with Heidegger. Oxford and Portland, Oregon, Hart Publishing, 2007. 406 p.

Heidegger M. Protokoll zu einem Seminar ueber den Vortrag “Zeit und Sein”. Heidegger M. Zur Sache des Denkens. Frankfurt-am-Main, Vittorio Clostermann, 2007, pp. 31–66.

Heinemann W. Die Relevanz der Philosophie Martin Heideggers fuer das Rechtsdenken. Freiburg im Breisgau, Hohen Rechtswissenschaftlichen Fakultaet der Albert-Ludwigs Universitaet, 1970. 425 p.

Loidolt S. Einfuehrung in die Rechtsphaenomenologie. Tuebingen, Mohr Siebek, 2010. 411 p.

Marcic R. Rechtsphilosophie. Eine Einfuehrung. Freiburg, Verlag Rombach, 1968. 294 p.

Minkkinen P. Thinking without Desire. Portland, Hart Publishing, 1999. 205 p.

Sprenger G. Ueber den Ort des Rechts in der Fundamentalontologie Martin Heideggers. Rechtsstaat und Menschenwuerde. Festschrift fuer W. Maihofer zum 70 Geburstag. V. Klostermann, Frankfurt am Main, 1988, pp. 549–569.

Tontti J.cRight and Prejudice. Prolegomena to a Hermeneutical Philosophy of Law. Burlington, Ashgate, 2004. 204 p.

Published
2016-06-01
How to Cite
Stovba , A. V. (2016). M. Heidegger’s philosophy and legal thought (remarks on the review of A. V. Stovba’s article “Does the theory of law need M. Heidegger’s ideas?” Made by professor N. V. Razuvaev). Pravovedenie, 60(3), 218-233. Retrieved from https://pravovedenie.spbu.ru/article/view/6962
Section
Academia