The object and subject of the legal science

Authors

  • Vladimir F. Popondopulo St. Petersburg State University

Abstract

The article discusses the concept and content of the legal science, its subject and object. The term “subject” of the legal science refers to the principles of origin and development of legal phenomena and processes. The term“object” means social and legal phenomena and processes themselves (law and other aspects of society, including legal practice and doctrine) studied by the legal science in the process of perception of its subject. The author examines scientific approaches to the question of law understanding and the essence of law. It is noted that the answer to the question about the nature of law enables to clarify the remaining scientific picture of the legal world, to define other characteristics of law as an object of the legal science, and, moreover, principles of its origin and development as a subject of the legal science, to understand the place of law within the system of other social phenomena and processes. In this case, identification of an abstract essence of the law outside its connections with other social phenomena and processes is a methodological tool of scientific research hereinafter referred to as the method of ideal constructions. This method allows the researcher to disengage himself/herself from the circumstances existing in reality and imagine hypothetical consequences of absence of these circumstances, external to the law, to understand the meaning of their existence, to comprehend the category of law in its essence as an object of a scientific study. The author criticizes the definitions of the law essence through the factors, external to a person as a right holder (theory of the positive law, theory of the natural law and the like). The essence of law is determined from willful engaged actions of individuals themselves, as a result of their typified actual interaction expressed in the relevant rules of conduct recognized in the society and therefore generally binding (activity-based, communication theories of law).

Keywords:

legal science, object of the legal science, subject of the legal science, essence of law, principles of law

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Vladimir F. Popondopulo, St. Petersburg State University

doctor of legal sciences, professor, head of the Department of Commercial Law; honoured scientist of the Russian Federation

References

Antonov M. V., Polyakov A. V., Chestnov I. L. Kommunikativnyi podkhod i rossiiskaia teoriia prava [Communicative approach and the Russian theory of law]. Pravovedenie, 2013, no. 6, pp. 78–95. (in Russian)

Bachinin V. A. Metodologicheskie problemy kauzal’no-determinatsionnogo analiza pravovykh realii [Methodological problems causally-determination analysis of right-wing realities]. Pravovedenie, 2007, no. 6, pp. 149–158. (in Russian)

Bakhtin M.M. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva [Esthetics of literary creativity]. Moscow, 1979. 423 p. (in Russian)

Belov S. A. Aktual’nost’ i perspektivy kodifikatsii administrativnogo zakonodatel’stva v Rossii [Actuality and prospects of the codification of administrative legislation in Russia]. Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda RF [Vestnik of the Higher Court Arbitration of RF], 2011, no. 12, pp. 6–21. (in Russian)

Gromicaris A., Krawietz W., Feddeler K. Pravovaia kommunikatsiia v sovremennoi pravovoi sisteme [Legal communication in modern legal system]. Pravovedenie, 2013, no. 6, pp. 58–77. (in Russian)

Kommunikativnaia kontseptsiia prava: voprosy teorii [Communicative concept of law: issues of theory]. St. Petersburg, 2003. 160 p. (in Russian)

Lazarev V.V. Mesto teorii gosudarstva i prava v sisteme gumanitarnogo znaniia [Place theory of State and law in the system of humanitarian knowledge]. Leningradskii iuridicheskii zhurnal [Leningrad law journal], 2008, no. 1, pp. 5–23. (in Russian)

Leonie B. Svoboda i zakon [Freedom and law]. Moscow, 2008. 308 p. (in Russian)

Maltsev G.V. Sotsial’nye osnovaniia prava [Social Foundation of law]. Moscow, 2007. 800 p. (in Russian)

Polyakov A. V. Obshchaia teoriia prava: kurs lektsii [General theory of law: a course of lectures]. St. Petersburg, 2001. 642 с. (in Russian)

Polyakov A.V. Verkhovenstvo prava, globalizatsiia i problemy modernizatsii filosofii i teorii prava [The rule of law, globalization and problems of modernization theory and philosophy of law]. Pravovedenie, 2013, no. 4, pp. 18–30. (in Russian)

Popondopulo V.F. Pravovoi rezhim predprinimatel’stva [Legal regime for entrepreneurship]. St. Petersburg, 1994. 208 p. (in Russian)

Puginsky B.I., Safiullin D.N. Pravovaia ekonomika: problemy stanovleniia [Legal economy: problems of formation]. Moscow, 1991. 240 p. (in Russian)

Romanetz U.V. Eticheskie osnovy prava i pravoponimanie [Ethical foundations of law and law-comprehension]. Moscow, 2012. 400 p. (in Russian)

Sapun V.A., Shundikov K.V. Instrumental’naia teoriia prava i chelovecheskaia deiatel’nost’ [Instrumental theory of law and the human activities]. Pravovedenie, 2013, no. 1, pp. 14–32. (in Russian)

Shundikov K.V. Sinergeticheskii podkhod k pravovedeniiu. Problemy metodologii i opyt teoreticheskogo primeneniia [Synergetic approach in jurisprudence. Problems of methodology and the experience of theoretical application]. Moscow, 2013. 256 p. (in Russian)

Syrykh V.M. Materialisticheskaia teoriia prava: izbr. [Materialist theory of law: Favorites]. Moscow, 2011. 1260 p. (in Russian)

Tarasov N.N. Metodologicheskie problemy iuridicheskoi nauki [Methodological problems of legal science]. Ekaterinburg, 2001. 264 p. (in Russian)

Van Hoek M. Pravo kak kommunikatsiia [Right as communication]. St. Petersburg, 2012. 288 p. (in Russian)

Vengerov A. B. Sinergetika, iuridicheskaia nauka, pravo [Synergetics, legal science, law]. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo [Soviet State and law], 1986, no.10, pp.39–46. (in Russian)

Vitjutnev Yu.Yu. O pravovoi sluchainosti i pravovom khaose [On judicial and legal chaos of randomness]. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava [Journal of Russian law], 2003, no. 7, pp. 72–78. (in Russian)

Von Humboldt’s V. O predelakh gosudarstvennoi deiatel’nosti [The extent of State activities]. Moscow, 2003. 200 p. (in Russian)

Von Mises L. Chelovecheskaia deiatel’nost’: traktat ob ekonomicheskoi teorii [Human action: a treatise on economic theory]. Chelyabinsk, 2005. 878 с. (in Russian)

Published

01.10.2016

How to Cite

Popondopulo, V. F. . (2016). The object and subject of the legal science. Pravovedenie, 60(5), 68–85. Retrieved from https://pravovedenie.spbu.ru/article/view/7004

Issue

Section

Concept of law