Roman law in the jurisprudence of Russian courts

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu25.2024.101

Abstract

In modern Russian judicial practice, the justification of court decisions by normative provisions extracted from all that is collectively embraced by the concept of “soft law” is becoming increasingly widespread. In this article, this phenomenon is revealed in the aspect of the practical application by Russian courts of certain provisions of Roman law. Considering specific examples of this kind, the authors, through doctrinal reflection, seek to identify common reasons that encourage domestic courts to turn to the mentioned source of “soft law” and come to the conclusion that modern Russian civil law in a sense repeated the path that was traversed by the civil law of imperial Russia. If, back in the middle of the 19th century, the judiciary could not even think of looking for a source of inspiration anywhere other than a literal interpretation of the text of the law, then with the beginning of the “Great Reforms” of the 1860s, the unsuitability of such an approach for servicing the rapidly developing turnover was revealed, and since the legislator could not keep up with its development, the main work of adapting positive law to changing relations was accepted the courts have assumed much broader discretionary powers. Since the possibilities of the domestic doctrine to meet the needs of the law enforcement officer in understanding and developing Russian law turned out to be very limited, judges found themselves in demand for the European civilian tradition based on Roman law, familiarity with which prompted them to independent judicial law-making. In many ways, similar processes are observed in post-Soviet Russia, a visible manifestation of which is the expansion of “soft law” into law enforcement practice, primarily through an appeal to the analogy of law and teleological interpretation. One of the facets of this process is the revival of interest in the legacy of Roman law and the Romanistic tradition. In this sense, unexpected parallels are found with the development of the common law. 

Keywords:

soft law, Roman law, judicial practice, doctrine

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Avenarius, Martin. 2009. Roman Law in Russia. Moscow: Academia Publ. (In Russian)

Buckland, William. W., McNair, Arnold D. 1965. Roman Law and Common Law. A Comparison in Outline. Rev. by F. H. Lawson. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Cardozo, Benjamin N. 2017. The Nature of the Judicial Process. Мoscow, Statute Publ. (In Russian)

Giaro, Tomasz. 2016. From contemporary soft law to the Ancient soft law. Pravovedenie 325 (2): 198–219. (In Russian)

Koval, Vladimir G. 2023. Application of Non-State Codifications of Private Law by Russian Courts. The Experience of Civilistic Research: A Collection оf Articles. Iss. 5. Eds A. M. Shirvindt, N. B. Shcherbakov. Мoscow, Statut Publ.: 65–96. (In Russian)

Lupoi, Maurizio. 2020. English “equity” and the civil law: a tale of two worlds. Trusts & Trustees 26 (2):176–182.

Poldnikov. Dmitrij J. 2013. The Institute of Contract in the Legal Scholarship of Western Europe of 11th–18th centuries: tutorial. Мoscow, Publishing House of the HSE University: 13–56. (In Russian)

Rudokvas, Anton D. 2017. Il diritto romano e la privatistica Russa. Nel Mondo del Diritto Romano. Convegno ARISTEC. Roma 10‒11 Ottobre 2014. a cura di L. Vacca. Napoli, Jovene Editore: 261–288.

Rudokvas, Anton D. 2023. «Continental Trusts» and Conceptualization of «Fiduciary Obligations» in the Civilian Tradition. Issues of Private Law: Collection of Papers for the 50th Anniversary of A. A. Pavlov. Eds А. G. Karapetov, T. A. Sargsjan. Мoscow, Statute Publ.: 284–305. (In Russian)

Rudokvas, Anton D., Novikov Andrej A. 2021. On the application of Byzantine law in modern Bessarabia. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law 12 (1): 205–223.

Savigny, Friedrich Carl. 2011–2017. System of Contemporary Roman Law [in 8 vols]. Vol. 1–5. Мoscow, Statut Publ. (In Russian)

Stein, Peter. 1999. Roman law in European history. New York, Cambridge University Press.

Watson, Alan. 1993. Legal Transplants: An Approach to Comparative Law. 2nd ed. Athens, University of Georgia Press.

Zimmermann, Reinhard. 2004. Roman Law, Contemporary Law, European Law. The Civilian Tradition Today. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Published

26.05.2024

How to Cite

Rudokvas, A. D., & Fedorova, O. A. (2024). Roman law in the jurisprudence of Russian courts. Pravovedenie, 68(1), 7–25. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu25.2024.101