The role of comparative studies in the formation of Japan’s mixed legal system

Authors

  • Elena N. Trikoz MGIMO University; RUDN University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu25.2023.204

Abstract

The theoretical influence of legal comparative scientists and the practical role of comparative legal studies of foreign law on the process of modernization of traditional Japanese law are determined in this article. The Japanese acceptance of the Western legal model, the reception of the Romano-Germanic doctrine, texts and ideology, learning from European jurists invited to the country and other factors led to the Westernization of management practice and legal regulation of life in Japan. Voluntary “legal acculturation” took place under the direct influence of comparative models of codification and reception of foreign law. The author conventionally identifies five stages of “legal westernization” of the Japanese system of law. At the first stage, French jurisprudence had the greatest dogmatic and partly practical impact on the Japanese, when the legal education of local officials in the Napoleonic spirit began, the first translations of French legal treatises took place, and Parisian lawyers prepared important codification projects. The Japanese then became fascinated with Anglo-American legal culture, driven by an influx of British lawyers who came to the islands to serve the local community of Her Majesty’s subjects, as well as the establishment of the first school of English law in the capital. At the third stage, as the reactionary-militarist policy developed, the emphasis shifted towards the German branch of the European family, and Japanese law was reoriented to the German bourgeois-landlord legislation and the pandect model of codification. At the fourth stage, there was an assimilation of American jurisprudence and US legal realism, and the mutual interest of overseas comparativists in Japanese legal studies increased. In the fifth stage, the comparative approach again became the foundations of a new wave of legal reforms in Japan. Japanese law moved slowly from the family of Confucian-Chinese and traditional Shinto law to the Germanic branch of the Roman law family and then turned into a “gray legal culture”, at the crossroads of Western and East Asian legal cultures. 

Keywords:

mixed system, legal culture, reception, lawmaking, systematization of law, codification, civil code, customs, weights, traditions, Confucianism, Shintoism

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Aoki, Hitoshi. 2020. Comparative Law and Multicultural Legal Classes: A Japanese Example. Comparative Law and Multicultural Legal Classes: challenge or opportunity? Ed. by Cs. Varga. Cham: Springer: 46–47.

Appleton, Richard B. 1949. Reforms in Japanese Criminal Procedure under Allied Occupation. Washington Law Review 24: 401–403.

Becker, Joseph E. 1913. Commentary on the Commercial Code of Japan. Yokohama.

Blakemore, Thomas L. 1947. Post-War Developments in Japanese Law. Wisconsin Law Review. July: 632–653.

Cabrillac, Rémy. 2007. Codifications = Les codifications. Transl. from French. Moscow, Statute Publ. (In Russian)

Cheng, Lucie, Rosett, Arthur, Woo, Margaret Y. K. 2002. East Asian Law: Universal Norms and Local Cultures. London, Routledge Curzon.

David, René, Brierley, John E. C. 1968. Major Legal Systems in the World Today. London. Denisenko, Vladislav V., Trikoz, Elena N. 2018. Typology of mixed legal systems. Legal Science and Practice: Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2 (42): 29–37. (In Russian)

Dore, Ron P. 1958. City life in Japan. A study of a Tokyo Ward. London.

Eiichi, Hoshino. 1991. L’héritage de G. Boissonade dans le Code Civil et dans la doctrine du droit civil au Japon. Revue internationale de droit comparé 43: 407–410.

Eremin, Vladimir N. 2010. History of the Legal System of Japan. Moscow. (In Russian)

Gorai, T. 1904. Influence du Code Civil français sur le Japon. Le Code Civil: Livre du Centenaire. Paris: A. Rousseau 2: 783–794.

Hall, John C. 1979. Japanese Feudal Law. Washington, American University Publ., Washington, DC.

Henderson, Dan Fenno. 1965. Conciliation and Japanese law, Tokugawa and Modern. Seattle: University of Washington Press; Tokyo, University of Tokyo Press.

Hozumi, Nobushige. 1904. Lectures on the New Japanese Civil Code as Materials for the Study of Comparative Jurisprudence. Tokyo: Sagwan Press.

Imperial Letter to Emperors and Presidents on the Dispatch of Iwakura Mission, November 4, 1871.

Meiji Japan through Contemporary Sources. 1970. Vol. 2. Tokyo: 95–96.

Inako, Ts. 1981. Modern law of Japan. Transl. from Japanese; ed. and with entry. article by Vladimir N. Eremin. Moscow.

Itoh, Hirobumi. 1889 Commentary on the Constitution of Japan. Tokyo. (In Japanese)

Ivanami, Shinsho. 1977. Boissonade is the father of modern Japanese law. Tokyo. (In Japanese)

Katsuta, Aritsune. 1996. Japan: A Grey Legal Culture. Studies in Legal Systems: Mixed and Mixing, ed. by E. Orucu, E. Attwooll, S. Coyle. Kluwer Law International. P. 249–260.

Kim, Chin, Lawson, С. M. 1979. The Law of the Subtle Mind: The Traditional Japanese Conception of Law. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 3: 491–498.

Kitagawa, Zentaro. 2008. Development of Comparative Law in East Asia. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law. Ed. by M. Reimann, R. Zimmermann. Oxford University Press, 2006.

Kiyoshi, Igarashi. 2015. Hikakuhou Handbook. Keisoshobou. 2nd ed. (In Japanese)

Kovalchuk, Marina K. 2012. Great Britain through the eyes of the Japanese. Iwakura Mission to England, 1872. Yearbook Japan 41: 352–366. (In Russian)

Lafitsky, Vladimir I. (ed.). 2013. Comparative Law: National Legal Systems. Vol. 3. Legal systems of Asia Moscow. (In Russian)

Law in Japan = Nihon hō. Tokyo: Japanese American Society for Legal Studies, 1967–2021.

Lupoi, Maurizio. 2023. Trusts in mixed jurisdictions. Pravovedenie 67 (1): 21–55. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu25.2023.102

Marutschke, Hans P. 2006. Beiträge zur Modernen Japanischen Rechtsgeschichte. Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag.

Masao, Ôki. 1999. Legal Ideas of the Japanese. Anthology of World Legal Thought. Vol. I: Antiquity.

Eastern civilizations, ed. by Leonid R. Sukiyainen. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ.: 614–617. (In Russian)

Merryman, John H., Clark, David S., Haley, John O. 2010. Comparative Law: Historical Development of the Civil Law Tradition in Europe, Latin America, and East Asia. LexisNexis.

Nish Ian (ed.). 1998. The Iwakura Mission in America and Europe. Japan Library.

Noda, Yosiyuki. 1963. La réception du droit français au Japon. Revue internationale de droit comparé 15, 3. Juillet — Septembre: 543–556.

Noda, Yosiyuki. 1966. Introduction au droit japonais. Coll. “Les systemes de droit contemporains”. T. XIX. Paris, Dalloz: 546–548.

Noda, Yosiyuki. 1981. Comparative Law in Japan: Past and Present. Essays on Comparative Law. Ed. by Vladimir A. Tumanov. Moscow, Progress Publ. (In Russian)

Nottage, Luke R. 2019. The Development of Comparative Law in Japan. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law. Ed. by M. Reimann, R. Zimmermann. Oxford University Press: 201–227.

Oda, Hiroshi. 2021. Japanese Law. Oxford University Press. 4th ed.

Örücü, Esin. 1995. A Theoretical Framework for Transfrontier Mobility of Law. Transfrontier Mobility of Law. Ed. by R. Jagtenberg, E. Örücü, A. de Roo. Kluwer Law International: 12–15.

Popov, Konstantin A. 1984. Legislative acts of medieval Japan. Moscow. (In Russian)

Rabinowitz, Richard W. 1955. Materials on Japanese Law in Western Languages. The American Journal of Comparative Law 4 (1): 97–104.

Sakae, Wagatsuma, Chiru, Ariizumi. 1983. Japanese Civil Law. Transl. from Japanese. Moscow. (In Russian)

Sansom, George. 1977. A History of Japan, 1615–1867. Tokyo. (In Japanese)

Schaeffer, E. 1986. De l’importation des Codes à la fin du XIX siècle et au début du XX siècle et de leur réception. Revue juridique et politique — Indépendance et Coopération: 281–285.

Soviak, Eugene. 1971. On the nature of Western progress: the journal of the Iwakura embassy. Tradition and Modernization in Japanese Culture. Ed. by Donald Shively. Princeton: 7–34.

Steiner, Kurt. 1950. Far Eastern Section, Postwar Changes in the Japanese Civil Code. Washington Law Review 25: 286–288.

Stevens, Charles R. 1971. Modern Japanese Law as an Instrument of Comparison. American Journal of Comparative Law 19 (4).

Sukharev, Alexander I. (ed.). 2001. Legal systems of the countries of the world: Encyclopedic reference book. Moscow, Infra-M; NORMA Publ. (In Russian)

Tadashi, Takizawa. 2009. Hikakuhou. Sanseidou. (In Japanese)

Travin, David. 2007. Great Reformers. Emperor Meiji. Way of the Rising Sun. Delo Weekly. December 24. (In Russian)

Trikoz, Elena N. 2014. Features of codification of law in medieval Japan. Legal Traditions. Zhidkov readings: materials of the International scientific conference. Moscow, RUDN Press: 327–333. (In Russian)

Trikoz, Elena N. 2018. World Congress of Comparatives in Japan (Fukuoka, The IACL World Congress — 2018). Vestnik RUDN University. Series: Legal Sciences 22: 602–609. (In Russian)

Trikoz, Elena N. 2020. Military-class codifications in medieval Japan (the era of the first shogunates). Vestnik RUDN University. Series: Legal Sciences 4: 965–984. (In Russian)

Trikoz, Elena N., Shvets, Anna A. 2019. Peculiarities of Western Private Law Reception in Meiji Japan. Law and State: Problems of Methodology, Theory and History. Krasnodar: 298–304. (In Russian)

Turan, Kayaoglu. 2010. Legal imperialism: sovereignty and extraterritoriality in Japan, the Ottoman Empire, and China. Cambridge; New York.

Upham, Frank K. 1987. Law and social change in postwar Japan. Cambridge, Massachusetts, Harvard University Press.

Vorobyov, Vladimir M. 1980. The Japanese Code “Taiho Yoro Ryo” (18th century) and the Law of the Early Middle Ages. Moscow. (In Russian)

Wagatsuma, Sakae, Ariizumi, Toru. 1983. Japanese Civil Law. Book one. Transl. from English. Moscow. (In Russian)

Wigmore, John H. 1986. Law and Justice in Tokugawa Japan: Materials for the history of Japanese law and justice under the Tokugawa Shogunate 1603–1867. Tokyo, University of Tokyo Press.

Yamaguchi, Toshio. 1993. Rapport Japonais. La circulation du modèle juridique français. Travaux de 1’association Capitant XLIV: 536–545.

Yapparov, Shamilj Sh. 2011. “New aristocracy” in Japan in the last quarter of the 19th — the first half of the 20th century: structure, role and features. History and culture of traditional Japan — 4. Proceedings of the Institute of Oriental Cultures and Antiquity. Issue XXXIX. Transl. by A. N. Meshcheryakov. Moscow. P. 82–88. (In Russian)

Zweigert, Konrad, Kotz, Hein. 1971. Einführung in die Rechtsvergleichung auf dem Gebiet des Privatrechts, erste Auflage 1. Tübingen: 431–434.

Published

28.07.2023

How to Cite

Trikoz, E. N. . (2023). The role of comparative studies in the formation of Japan’s mixed legal system. Pravovedenie, 67(2), 203–215. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu25.2023.204

Most read articles by the same author(s)