Erich Jung on the national socialist theory of sources of law

Authors

  • Marat D. Bilalutdinov West Siberian branch of the Russian State University of Justice; Yurga Technological Institute of the National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University

Abstract

The article constitutes the first attempt to study the Nazi totalitarian approach to one of the most essential problems of the theory of law, namely, the sources of law. This problem is examined on the example of “A doctrine on sources of law and Jewry” written by Erich Jung, one of the most notable German legal theorists who supported the Nazi regime. This article examines Jung’s views on judicial law enforcement, justice, positive law, and customs as sources of law. The article also analyzes Jung’s critique of the historical school of law, theories of natural law, positivistic understanding of law, the school of free judicial discretion, common law. The author concludes that Jung and other German lawyers of the Third Reich created a legal newspeak aimed at legalizing the key ideological theses of the Nazism, in particular the idea of people’s community (Volksgemeischaft) understood in racial terms, and at justification of interests of this community as a supreme source of law. Nazi antagonism towards positivist understanding of law is determined by the fact that positivism deideologizes law, particularly in its interpretation by Kelsen. The theory of natural law is formally the closest one to the Nazi understanding of sources of law. Both in natural and Nazi understanding of law the basic a priori principles which cannot be changed by lawmakers are considered to be primary sources of law. However, the fundamental difference is that within the natural law these principles focus on humanistic basics of human and civil rights and freedoms, whereas within the Nazi understanding of law they focus on the interests of Volksgemeinschaft based on a race. The author also points out the positive aspects of Jung’s views on the sources of law. They include the apologetics of independence of the judicial power and freedom of judicial discretion. However, in Third Reich’s law enforcement practice the freedom of judicial discretion meant the freedom for punishment of the regime opponent, including the usage of criminal law by analogy.

Keywords:

sources of law, historical school of law, judicial discretion, natural law, justice, lawmaking, positivism

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Marat D. Bilalutdinov, West Siberian branch of the Russian State University of Justice; Yurga Technological Institute of the National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University

candidate of historical sciences, associate professor of Department of Theory and History of Law and State; associate professor of the Department of Education in the Humanities and Foreign Languages 

References

K kritike gegelevskoi filosofii prava. Vvedenie [Marx Critique of Hegel‘s legal Philosophy. Introduction]. K. Marx and F. Engels. Poln. sobr. soch [Collected Works]. 2nd ed. Vol. 1. Moscow, Printing House, 1954, pp. 414–419. (in Russian)

Rosenberg A. Mif XX veka [The Myth of the XX century]. Tallinn, Shildex Publ., 1998. 516 p. (in Russian)

Das Judentum in der Rechtswissenchaft. Band 1. Die deutsche Rechtswissenchaft in Kampf gegen den jüdischen Geist. Deutscher Recht Verlag. Berlin, 1936. 36 p.

Jung E. Das Judentum in der Rechtswissenchaft. Band 8. Rechtsquellenlehre und Judentum. Positivismus, Freirechtschule, neue Rechtsquellenlehre. Deutscher Recht Verlag. Berlin, 1938. 48 p.

Rilk O. Das Judentum in der Rechtswissenchaft. Band 9. Judentum und Wettbewerb. Deutscher Recht Verlag. Berlin, 1936, p. 12.

Published

01.12.2016

How to Cite

Bilalutdinov, M. D. . (2016). Erich Jung on the national socialist theory of sources of law. Pravovedenie, 60(6), 212–223. Retrieved from https://pravovedenie.spbu.ru/article/view/7037

Issue

Section

History of the legal thought