Правовое мышление как интеллектуальная составляющая юридического познания

Авторы

  • Юрий Петрович Боруленков Санкт-Петербургская академия следственного комитета России

Аннотация

В центре внимания автора статьи находится правовое мышление, являющееся ядром интеллектуальной составляющей юридического познания и представляющее собой связанные с наличием проблемных ситуаций особого рода духовно-практические и познавательно-оценочные интеллектуальные операции, направленные на постановку определенных задач и решение проблем в правовой сфере. Основными механизмами понимания как результата и одного из процессов мышления являются взаимосвязанные осмысление содержания (значений) и выявление смысла понимаемого, на стыке которых рождаются новые образы и вербально значащие формы. В основе порождения смысла лежат проявляющиеся в жизни людей разные и противоречивые контексты. Целеобразование выступает ключевым моментом становления и развития смысла в деятельности индивида. Правовое мышление следует рассматривать как сложную объемную полиструктуру, базирующуюся на определенных формах и способах юридической логики, юридического языка и мировоззренческих основаниях, состоящую из нескольких горизонтальных образований и вертикальных уровней, обусловленную объективной логикой достижения промежуточных и конечных целей, унифицированными и индивидуальными, теоретическими и практическими, профессиональными и непрофессиональными факторами. Автором отмечается, что обыденный, научно-теоретический и профессиональный виды правового мышления схематично представляют собой принципиально одинаковую мыслительную процедуру интерпретации и конструирования правовой реальности; в то же время соотношение теоретического и практического подходов, а также профессиональная составляющая позволяют на надындивидуальном уровне выделить ряд их существенных особенностей. Подчеркивается, что повседневное индивидуальное правовое мышление не просто лежит в основании иных видов правового мышления; в сознании ученого или правоприменителя «юрист» не замещает «обывателя», они сосуществуют. Мышление юриста-практика представляет собой сложную динамичную систему параллельно протекающих и в то же время оказывающих взаимное влияние обыденного и профессионального видов мышления. Их соотношение зависит от степени погруженности в юридическую материю, правовую среду. 

Ключевые слова:

юридическое познание, методология юридического познания, технология юридического познания, правовое мышление

Скачивания

Данные скачивания пока недоступны.

Биография автора

Юрий Петрович Боруленков , Санкт-Петербургская академия следственного комитета России

кандидат юридических наук, доцент, проректор

Библиографические ссылки

Abakumova I.V. Bazovye poniatiia klassicheskoi didaktiki v kontekste teorii smysla [The main concepts of classic didactics in the context of theory of sense]. Announcer ОGU, 2002, no. 8, pp. 14–18. (In Russian)

Agafonov A.Yu. Chelovek kak smyslovaia model’ mira. Prolegomeny k psikho- logicheskoi teorii smysla [Human as semantic model of the world. Preliminary remarks to the psychological theory of sense]. Samara, Bakhrakh-M Publ., 2000. 336 p. (In Russian)

Alefirenko N.F. Lingvokul’turologiia. Tsennostno-smyslovoe prostranstvo iazyka: ucheb. posobie [Cultural linguistics. Value-language semantic space: Textbook]. Moscow, Flinta, Nauka Publ., 2010. 288 p. (In Russian)

Aleksandrov A. S. Vvedenie v sudebnuiu lingvistiku [Introduction to judicial linguistics]. Nizhny Novgorod, Nizhny Novgorod Law Academy, 2003. 420 p. (In Russian)

Alekseev P. V., Panin A. V. Filosofiia: uchebnik [Philosophy: Textbook]. Moscow, MGU Publ., 2005. 608 p. (In Russian)

Artishevskaya T.M. Psikhologiia massovykh kommunikatsii: ucheb. posobie: v 2 ch. [Psychology of Mass Communication: Textbook: in 2 parts]. Part 1. Chelyabinsk, Cheliab. gos. un-t Publ., 2010. 198 p. (In Russian)

Avakian T.V. Iuridicheskoe myshlenie v pravoprimenitel’nom protsesse. Avtoref. dis. kand. iurid. nauk [The legal thinking is in a law applying process. Synopsis dissertation of the candidate of legal sciences]. Rostov on Don, 2006. 18 р. (In Russian)

Babayeva Yu.D., Berezanskaya N.B., Vasiliev I.A., Voiskunsky A.E., Kornilova T.V. Smysloobrazovanie kak osnovnoi protsess integratsii novoobrazovanii v myshlenii / Smyslovaia teoriia myshleniia [Sense making as a primary process of integration in thinking. Semantic theory of thinking]. Bulletin of Moscow University. Science Magazine. Series 14. Psychology, 2008, no. 2, pp. 39–43. (In Russian)

Bachinin V.A., Salnikov V.P. Filosofiia prava. Kratkii slovar’. (Ser. «Mir kul’tury, istorii i filosofii») [Philosophy of Law. Concise Dictionary]. St. Petersburg, Lan’, 2000. 400 p. (In Russian)

Baev O.Ya. O pravovoi korrektnosti argumentov v nauchnykh diskussiiakh poslednego vremeni [Replica. On the legal correctness of the arguments in scientific discussions recent years]. Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyi zhurnal [Criminologist’s Library. Science Magazine], 2015, no. 6, pp. 20–23. (In Russian)

Bakhtin M.M. [Author and main character in aesthetic activity]. Avtor i geroi: K filosofskim osnovam gumanitarnykh nauk [Author and main character: the philosophical foundations of the humanities]. St. Petersburg, Azbuka Publ., 2000. 337 p. (In Russian)

Bakhtin M. M. K filosofii postupka. Filosofiia i sotsiologiia nauki i tekhniki: Ezhegodnik. 1984–1985 [To the philosophy of act. Philosophy and sociology of science and technology: Yearbook. 1984–1985]. Moscow, Science Publ., 1986. 252 p. (In Russian)

Baranov P.P., Kurbatov V.I. Logika dlia iuristov [Logic for lawyers]. Rostov on Don, RIuI MVD Rossii, 2003. 620 p. (In Russian)

Bezlepkin N.I. Filosofiia iazyka v Rossii: K istorii russkoi lingvofilosofii [Philosophy of Language in Russia: On the history of Russian linguistics philosophy]. St. Petersburg, «Art» Publ., 2002. 272 p. (In Russian)

Borulenkov Yu. P. [The structure of legal knowledge: general-theoretical aspect / role of the Russian Federal Penitentiary Service of educational institutions in ensuring the effective functioning of the penal system]. Rol’ obrazovatel’nykh uchrezhdenii FSIN Rossii v obespechenii effektivnogo funktsionirovaniia UIS: materialy mezhdunarod. nauch.-prakt. konf., posviashchennoi 65-letiiu VIuI FSIN Rossii [Proceedings of the international scientific- practical conference dedicated to the 65-th anniversary of VYUI FSIN Russia]. Vladimir, 2009. P.152–160. (In Russian)

Borulenkov Yu.P. [Topical issues of the construction technologies of applied legal knowledge]. Nauchnye trudy. Rossiiskaia akademiia iuridicheskikh nauk [Publications. Russian Academy of Legal Sciences]. T. 1. Moscow, Lawyer Publ., 2016, pp. 40–45. (In Russian)

Borulenkov Yu.P. [Truth in adversarial legal understanding]. Teoriia ugolovnogo protsessa: sostiazatel’nost’: monografiia [Theory of the criminal process: competitiveness: a monograph]. Ed. N. A. Kolokolova. Part 2. Moscow, Iurlitinform Publ., 2013, pp. 202–227. (In Russian)

Borulenkov Yu. P. Intuitsiia kak spetsificheskii fenomen iuridicheskogo poznaniia [Intuition as a specific phenomenon of the legal understanding]. Rossiiskii sledovatel’ [Russian investigator], 2014, no. 23, pp. 3–8. (In Russian)

Borulenkov Yu.P. Iuridicheskii fakt kak obraz obstoiatel’stva real’noi deistvitel’nosti [Legal fact as the image of the circumstances of reality]. Business in law. International Journal of Economics and Law, 2013, no. 1, pp. 122–127. (In Russian)

Borulenkov Yu.P. Iuridicheskoe poznanie (nekotorye metodologicheskie, teoreticheskie i prakseologicheskie aspekty): monografiia [Legal understanding (some methodological, theoretical and Praxeological aspects): Monograph]. Ed. by V.N.Kartashov. Moscow, Iurlitinform Publ., 2014. 392 p. (In Russian)

Borulenkov Yu. P. Iuridicheskoe poznanie i razdvoenie individual’nogo soznaniia iurista [Legal understanding and lawyers’ split individual consciousness]. Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyi zhurnal [Library criminologist. Science Magazine], 2014, no.4, pp.366–376. (In Russian)

Borulenkov Yu.P. Iuridicheskoe poznanie, dokazatel’stvo i dokazyvanie (metodologiia, teoriia, praktika): monografiia [Legal knowledge, evidence and proof (methodology, theory, practice): Monograph]. Scientific. Ed. prof. V.N.Kartashov. Moscow, Iurlitinform Publ., 2016. 536 p. (In Russian)

Borulenkov Yu.P. Kompetentnost’ sub”ekta iuridicheskogo poznaniia [The competence of the subject of legal knowledge]. Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyi zhurnal [Criminologist’s library. Science Magazine], 2015, no. 1, pp. 322–330. (In Russian)

Borulenkov Yu.P. Metodologicheskii status germenevtiki v iuridicheskom poznanii [Methodological status of hermeneutics in legal knowledge]. Iuridicheskaia nauka: istoriia i sovremennost’ [Legal Science: history and modernity], 2015, no. 7, pp. 189–199. (In Russian)

Borulenkov Yu.P. Metodologiia iuridicheskogo poznaniia: deiatel’nostnyi podkhod [Methodology of legal understanding: the activity approach]. Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyi zhurnal [Criminologist’s Library. Science Magazine], 2015, no.6, pp.323–332. (In Russian)

Borulenkov Yu.P. Metodologiia iuridicheskogo poznaniia: lingvisticheskii podkhod [Methodology of legal understanding: linguistic approach]. Iuridicheskaia nauka: istoriia i sovremennost’ [Legal Science: history and modernity], 2013, no.10, pp.206–216. (In Russian)

Borulenkov Yu.P. Metodologiia iuridicheskogo poznaniia: logicheskii podkhod [Methodology of legal understanding: logical approach]. Bulletin of the Academy of the Investigative Committee of Russian Federation, 2015, no. 4, pp. 42–50. (In Russian)

Borulenkov Yu. P. Tekhnologii iuridicheskogo poznaniia: poniatie i soderzhanie [Technology of Legal knowledge: the concept and content]. LEX RUSSICA. Proceedings of Moscow State Law Academy, 2015, no. 7, pp. 7–20. (In Russian)

Bryanskaia E. V. Argumentiruiushchaia sila dokazatel’stv pri rassmotrenii ugolovnykh del v sude pervoi instantsii: monografiia [Argue the strength of evidence in criminal proceedings in the court of first instance: a monograph]. Irkutsk, IGU Publ., 2015. 193 p. (In Russian)

Bryushinkin V.N. [Critical thinking and reasoning]. Kriticheskoe myshlenie, logika, argumentatsiia: sb. st. [Critical thinking, logic, reasoning: Sat. Art]. Eds. V. N. Bryushinkina, V. I. Markin. Kaliningrad, Kaliningr. gos. un-t Publ., 2003, pp. 29–35. (In Russian)

Davydova M. L. Professional’noe myshlenie iuristov v sravnitel’no-pravovom rakurse [Professional Thinking of lawyers in comparative legal perspective]. Vestnik Universiteta im. O. E. Kutafina [Bulletin of the University of them. O. E. Kutafina], 2015, no. 5, pp. 66–72. (In Russian)

Dmitrieva L. A. [Cognitive styles as a factor in establishing the truth in a criminal case]. Ugolovnyi protsess: ot proshlogo k budushchemu: materialy Mezhdunarod. nauch.-prakt. konf. (Moskva, 21 marta 2014 g.) [Criminal procedure: from the past to the future: materials of the International scientific-practical conference (Moscow, 21 March 2014)]. At 2 parts, Part 2. Moscow, 2014, pp. 55–58. (In Russian)

Egorov V.A. Genezis iuridicheskogo myshleniia [The genesis of the legal thinking]. Available at: http://www.konspekt.biz/index.php?text=53592 (accessed: 07.12.2016). (In Russian)

Glukhareva L. I. Dogma prava i dogmatichnost’ iuridicheskogo myshleniia [Law Dogma and legal dogmatic thinking]. Vestnik RGGU. Nauchnyi zhurnal [Journal of Russian State Humanitarian University. Science Magazine], 2013, no. 19, pp. 19–26. (In Russian)

Gradirovsky S. N. Vosstanovlenie osnovanii dogmaticheskogo myshleniia kak uslovie formirovaniia myshleniia [Recovering bases of dogmatic thinking as a condition of formation of thinking]. Available at: http://www.archipelag.ru/agenda/gospel_povestka/konferens_r_vs_r_2012/text12/ (accessed: 07.19.2016). (In Russian)

Gredeskul N.A. K ucheniiu ob osushchestvlenii prava. Intellektual’nyi protsess, tre- buiushchiisia dlia osushchestvleniia prava [The implementation of teaching law. Intellectual process required for the exercise of Law]. Kharkov, typography Adolf Darre, 1900. 245 p. (In Russian)

Gubaeva T. V. Iazyk i pravo. Iskusstvo vladeniia slovom v professional’noi iuridicheskoi deiatel’nosti [Language and Law. The art of word in a professional legal process]. Moscow, Norma Publ., 2003. 160 p. (In Russian)

Gulyaikhin V.N. Genezis teorii pravovoi sotsializatsii [Genesis of legal socialization theory]. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava [Magazine of the Russian right], 2013, no. 5, pp. 48–56. (In Russian)

Hramtsova N.G. Pravovoe myshlenie i iazyk prava — ob”ektivnye osnovaniia pravovogo diskursa [Legal thinking and Law language — the objective of the legal discourse base]. Probely v rossiiskom zakonodatel’stve [Gaps in Russian legislation], 2009, no.1, pp. 54–58. (In Russian)

Iering R. Iuridicheskaia tekhnika [Legal Technology]. Compiler A. V. Polyakov. Moscow, Statute Publ., 2008. 231 p. (In Russian)

Izyurov N. Advokaty: Odnopolchane i edinomyshlenniki [Lawyers: Brother-soldiers and associates]. Available at: http://www.iuaj.net/node/2034 (accessed: 06.27.2016). (In Russian)

Kachalov O.V. Vidy uskorennogo proizvodstva v rossiiskom ugolovnom protsesse [Types of accelerated production in the Russian criminal trial]. Moscow, Iurlitinform, 2016. 248 p. (In Russian)

Kalinowski K.B. Vyemka do vozbuzhdeniia ugolovnogo dela narushaet konstitutsionnyi printsip sorazmernosti ogranicheniia prav grazhdan [The recess before criminal proceedings violates the constitutional principle of proportionality limitation of citizens’ rights]. Ugolovnyi protsess [Criminal Procedure], 2016, no. 3, pp. 44–51. (In Russian)

Korkunoff N.M. Lektsii po obshchei teorii prava [Lectures on the general theory of law]. Comp., author of introd. art., comments. A. N. Medushevsky. Moscow, Russian Political Encyclopedia Publ., 2010. 520 p. (In Russian)

Kornienko A.F. Sushchnost’ protsessov myshleniia i myslitel’noi deiatel’nosti [The essence of the processes of thought and mental activity]. Nauchnyi dialog [Scientific dialogue], 2013, no. 4: Psychology. Pedagogy, pp. 49–62. (In Russian)

Lazarev V. V. Sotsial’no-psikhologicheskie aspekty primeneniia prava [Socio-psychological aspects of the application of the law]. Kazan, Publishing House of Kazan. University, 1982. 144 p. (In Russian)

Leger R. Velikie pravovye sistemy sovremennosti: sravnitel’no-pravovoi podkhod [Great legal systems of modernity: a comparative legal approach]. Moscow, Wolters Kluwer Publ., 2009. 584 p. (In Russian)

Lektorsky V.A. Epistemologiia klassicheskaia i neklassicheskaia [Epistemology classical and nonclassical]. Moscow, Editorial URSS, 2001. 256 p. (In Russian)

Leontiev A. N. Deiatel’nost’. Soznanie. Lichnost’ [Activities. Consciousness. Personality]. Moscow, Meaning, Academy Publ., 2005. 352 с. (In Russian)

Leontiev D.A. Smysloobrazovanie i ego konteksty: zhizn’, struktura, kul’tura, opyt [Sense making and its contexts: life, structure, culture, experience]. Mir psikhologii. Nauchno-metodicheskii zhurnal [World of Psychology. Scientific-methodical journal], 2014, no. 1, pp. 104–117. (In Russian)

Mikhailov A.M. Iuridicheskaia dogmatika i iuridicheskoe myshlenie (razmyshleniia) [Legal dogmatics and legal thinking (thinking)]. Available at: http://blog.pravo.ru/blog/theory/1588.html (accessed: 07.10.2016).

Mordovtsev A. Yu. Iuridicheskoe myshlenie v kontekste sravnitel’nogo pravovedeniia: kul’tur-antropologicheskie problemy [Legal thinking in the context of comparative law: cultural anthropology]. Pravovedenie, 2003, no. 2, pp. 38–48. (In Russian)

Ovchinnikov A.I. Pravovoe myshlenie v germenevticheskoi paradigme [The legal thinking in the hermeneutic paradigm]. Scientific. ed. by P. P. Baranov. Rostov n/D, Rostov State Univ. Publ, 2002. 285 p. (In Russian)

Ovchinnikov A.I. Pravovoe myshlenie: teoretiko-metodologicheskii analiz [Legal Thinking: theoretical and methodological analysis]. Dir. ed. by P.P.Baranov. Rostov n/D, Rostov State Univ. Publ., 2003. 344 p. (In Russian)

Perelman H., Albrecht-Tyteka L. [Language and modeling of social interaction]. Novaia ritorika: traktat po argumentatsii: perevody [The new rhetoric: a treatise on argumentation: Translations]. Comp. V.M.Sergeyev and P.B.Parshin, tot. ed. by V.V.Petrova. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1987, pp. 207–264. (In Russian)

Polyakov A.V. [The phenomenological theory of law N.N.Alekseev]. Rossiiskii pravovoi diskurs i ideia kommunikatsii: ucheb. posobie [Russian legal discourse and the idea of communication. Tutorial]. St. Petersburg, 2006, 60 p. (In Russian)

Przhilensky V.I. Iuridicheskoe poznanie i pravoprimenitel’nye praktiki v kontekste neklassicheskoi epistemologii [Legal knowledge and practice in the context of non-classical epistemology]. Problems of Philosophy, 2015, no. 8, pp. 42–52. (In Russian)

Przhilensky V. I. Real’nost’ i istina v konstruktivistskoi paradigme filosofii prava [Reality and truth in the constructivist paradigm of the philosophy of law]. LEX RUSSICA. Proceedings of Moscow State Law Academy, 2015, no. 5, pp. 23–43. (In Russian)

Psikhologicheskii mekhanizm iuridicheskogo povedeniia lichnosti [The psychological mechanism of the legal behavior of the person]. Under scientific. ed. V. N. Kartashov. Yaroslavl, Yaroslavl State University Publ., 2011. 184 p. (In Russian)

Ricoeur P. Germenevtika i metod sotsial’nykh nauk [Hermeneutics and the method of the social sciences]. Available at: http://www.philosophy.ru/library/ricoeur/social.html (accessed: 26.09.2014).

Rozin V.M. Genezis i sovremennye problemy prava. Metodologicheskii i kul’turologicheskii analiz [Genesis and modern Law issues. Methodological and cultural analysis. Moscow, NOTA BENE Publ., 2001. 336 p. (In Russian)

Ruzavin G.I. Metodologiia nauchnogo poznaniia: ucheb. posobie dlia vuzov [The methodology of scientific knowledge: Textbook. manual for schools]. Moscow, UNITY-DANA Publ., 2013. 287 p. (In Russian)

Schedrovitsky G. P. [Reflection in the activities]. Doklad na sovmestnykh zasedaniiakh sistemno-strukturnogo seminara i seminara po issledovaniiu refleksivnykh protsessov (5 i 12 ianvaria 1972 g.) [Report at the joint meetings of the systematic structural seminar and workshop on the study of reflexive processes (5 and 12 January 1972)]. Available at: https://docviewer.yandex.ru/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fbdn-steiner.ru%2Fmodules%2FBooks%2Ffiles%2FGP_3.doc&name=GP_3.doc&lang=u&c=5719b78c14a2 (accessed: 04.22.2016). (In Russian)

Schedrovitsky G. P. Myshlenie. Ponimanie. Refleksiia [Thinking. Understanding. Reflection]. Moscow, CMI Legacy Publ., 2005. 798 p. (In Russian)

Schutz A. Struktura povsednevnogo myshleniia [Structure of everyday thinking]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia [Sociological studies], 1988, no. 2. Available at: http://www.countries.ru/library/texts/shutz.htm (accessed: 04.20.2016).

Sigalov K.E. Metodologicheskie printsipy poznaniia sredy prava: (kak pravovoi kategorii i filosofsko-pravovogo fenomena) [Methodological principles of learning Law environment (as a legal category and philosophical and legal phenomenon)]. Istoriia gosudarstva i prava [History of State and Law], 2010, no. 4, pp. 13–16. (In Russian)

Skurko E. V. [Epistemology of Law: Theory and Practice]. Nauchnye trudy. Rossiiskaia akademiia iuridicheskikh nauk [Proceedings. Russian Academy of Legal Sciences]. T.1. Moscow, Lawyer Publ., 2011, pp. 511–517. (In Russian)

Spirkin A. G. Filosofiia [Philosophy]. Moscow, Gardariki Publ., 2002. 736 p. (In Russian)

Tarasov N.N. Metodologicheskie problemy iuridicheskoi nauki. Monografiia [Methodological problems of legal science. Monograph]. Ekaterinburg, Publishing House of the University of the Humanities, 2001. 264 p. (In Russian)

Terekhin V. V. Dopustimost’ dokazatel’stv v ugolovnom protsesse (metodologicheskii, pravovoi, eticheskii aspekty). Avtoref. dis. doct. iurid. nauk [Admissibility of evidence in criminal proceedings (methodological, legal and ethical aspects): Synopsis dissertation of the candidate of legal sciences]. Nizhni Novgorod, 2016. 54 p. (In Russian)

Tsvetkov Yu.A. Kakim byt’ rossiiskomu sledovateliu ili chem iurist otlichaetsia ot zakonnika? (Replika na repliku professora O. Ya. Baeva) [How to be a Russian investigator or what’s the difference between a lawyer and law applying person? (Replica replica of the professor Baev O.Ya.)]. Rossiiskii sledovatel’ [Russian investigator], 2016, no.11, pp.26–30. (In Russian)

Vidy i protsessy myshleniia. Razvitie myshleniia v personogeneze [Types and thinking processes. The development of thinking in personogenesis]. Available at: https://pro-psixology.ru/kognitivnoe-razvitie-psixologiya-poznavatelnyx/46-vidy-i-processy-myshleniya-razvitie-myshleniya-v.html (accessed: 10.26.2016). (In Russian)

Voishvillo E.K. Poniatie kak forma myshleniia: logiko-gnoseologicheskii analiz [Understanding as a form of thinking: logical-epistemological analysis]. Moscow, Moscow State University Publ., 1989. 239 p. (In Russian)

Vvedenie v filosofiiu: ucheb. posobie dlia vuzov [Introduction to Philosophy: Textbook. manual for Universities]. Authors I. T. Frolov and others. Moscow, The Republic Publ., 2003. 623 p. (In Russian)

Weiss Bernard J. Dukh musul’manskogo prava [The spirit of Islamic law]. Transl. S. S. Raimov. Moscow, St. Petersburg, Dilia Publ., 2008. 320 p. (In Russian)

Yarkova E. N. Istoriia i metodologiia iuridicheskoi nauki: ucheb. posobie [History and methodology of jurisprudence: a tutorial]. Tyumen, Publishing Tyumen State University, 2012. 348 p. (In Russian)

Yarmanova Yu.B. Zakonomernosti smysloobrazovaniia v protsesse ponimaniia [The regularities of meaning in the process of understanding]. Molodoi uchenyi [Young scientist]. 2015, no. 6, pp. 726–729. (In Russian)

Yasyukova L. Razryv mezhdu umnymi i glupymi narastaet [Gap between smart and stupid is growing]. Available at: http://materinstvo.ru/art/razryv-mejdu-umnymi-i-glupymi-narastaet (accessed: 06.17.2016). (In Russian)

Zakhartsev S. I., Salnikov V. P. Zavisimost’ zhiznedeiatel’nosti ot iuristov kak filosofskaia i filosofsko-pravovaia problema [The dependence of living on lawyers as a philosophical and philosophical-legal problem]. Iuridicheskaia nauka: istoriia i sovremennost’. Federal’nyi nauchno-prakticheskii zhurnal [Legal Science: history and modernity. Federal Scientific and practical journal], 2016, no. 9, pp. 125–129. (In Russian)

Zhalinsky A. E. Vvedenie v spetsial’nost’ «Iurisprudentsiia» [Introduction to the major «Jurisprudence»]. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2009. 362 p. (In Russian)

Znakov V.V. Ponimanie kak problema psikhologii myshleniia [Understanding as a problem of the psychology of thinking]. Voprosy psikhologii [Questions of psychology]. Available at: http://www.bim-bad.ru/biblioteka/article_full.php?aid=813&binn_rubrik_pl_articles=121 (accessed: 07/07/2016). (In Russian)

Zykov D.V. Nekotorye voprosy teorii iuridicheskogo myshleniia [Some questions of the theory of legal thinking]. Vestnik VolGU. Ser. 5: Iurisprudentsiia [Bulletin of Volgograd State University, Ser. 5: Law], 2012, no. 2, pp. 274–281. (In Russian)

Zykov D. V. O trekh vidakh iuridicheskogo myshleniia [The three types of legal thinking]. Bulletin of Volgograd State University, Ser. 5: Law, 2013, no. 2, pp. 82–85. (In Russian)

Загрузки

Опубликован

2017-04-01

Как цитировать

Боруленков , Ю. П. (2017). Правовое мышление как интеллектуальная составляющая юридического познания. Правоведение, 61(2), 6–41. извлечено от https://pravovedenie.spbu.ru/article/view/6734

Выпуск

Раздел

Концепция права