Compensation mechanism as a condition of commercial use of environmental components

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu25.2018.405

Abstract

The mechanism of compensation by the entrepreneur for the harm caused to the environment is part of the public-law regime for the use of nature by entrepreneurs; it consists in carrying out preventive and remedial measures, according to the draft economic activity. Through state environmental assessment and environmental impact assessment, the state assesses the adequacy of these measures to reduce the negative impact on the environment, the admissibility of the implementation of this economic activity, taking into account their implementation. As a result, for an entrepreneur, the limits of activity are established, which is an element of the private-legal regime for economic activity by entrepreneurs. If the entrepreneur complies with the established limits, carrying out activities in accordance with the project of economic activities approved during the state environmental impact assessment, he cannot be forced to compensate the damages in order of the tort liability, including under the current version of article 1064 of the Civil Code. In the legal relationship of obligation, entrepreneurs are liable for responsibility, being responsible for violation of an obligation without fault, but in tort obligations, increased responsibility of entrepreneurs is not established. The increased civil liability of the entrepreneur for the harm lawfully caused to the environment could be established, given that, when starting to carry out economic activities related to the impact on the environment, entrepreneurs assume the risk of adverse consequences in the form of a negative change in the state of the environment, which is not due to the shortcomings of the entrepreneur ‘s behavior (a commercial risk). However, the entrepreneur can only be held liable in three cases. First, for harm exceeding the limits of the agreed project of economic activity, second, for failure to carry out preventive and reconstruction measures or for unfair performance thereof and third, for activities carried out without passing the state ecological expertise. Damage exceeding the established limits can be compensated by insurance compensation under the environmental insurance contract. However, within the framework of such a model of relations between the entrepreneur and the State, the environmental user should be guaranteed that he will not be held liable for damage caused to the environment lawfully, as well as that his liability for damage exceeding the limits is limited to the maximum amount of insurance compensation. 

Keywords:

compensation of harm, legal regime, economic activity, environmental management of entrepreneurs, ecological insurance, tort liability

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Alekseev, Sergei S. 1981. General theory of law. Moscow, Yurid. lit. Publ. (In Russian)

Barshinov, Vladislav I. 2008. Problems of legal regulation to stimulate environmental insurance. Aktual’nye problemy rossiiskogo prava 3: 200–206. (In Russian)

Beliaeva, Galina S. 2015. Public legal regime: the essence, content, legal consolidation. Lex Russica 104 (7): 21–28. (In Russian)

Bergkamp, Lucas. 2001. Liability and Environment. The Hague, London, New York, Kluwer Law International.

Boltanova, Elena S. 2017. Compensation of environmental damage: the ratio of environmental and civil law. Imushchestvennye otnosheniia v Rossiiskoi Federatsii 8: 6–15. (In Russian)

Dolzhikov, Aleksey V. 2016. The concept of sustainable development and the constitutional principle of proportionality. Peterburgskii iurist 1: 76–85. (In Russian)

Dubovik, Olga L. 2007. Application of responsibility for environmental offenses: training manual for practitioners. Moscow, Gorodets Publ. (In Russian)

Gribanov, Veniamin P. 2000. The limits of the exercise and protection of civil rights. Moscow, Statut Publ. (In Russian)

Ioffe, Olimpiad S. 2003. Selected works: in 4 vols. Vol. 1: Responsibility under Soviet civil law. St. Petersburg, Iuridicheskii tsentr Press Publ. (In Russian)

Khludeneva Natalia I. 2019. Legal limits of property liability for damage to the environment. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava 3: 152–164. (In Russian)

Korobko, Vladimir I. 2012. Environmental management. Moscow, UNITY-DANA Publ. (In Russian)

Maidykov, Aleksey F., Melekhin Aleksander V. 2005. Problems of the formation of legislation on special legal regimes in the Russian Federation. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava 10 (106): 95–107. (In Russian)

Markin, Yurii. 2017. Environmental insurance as an integral risk management tool of an economic entity. Neft’, gaz i parvo 1: 15–18. (In Russian)

Minina, E. L. (ed.). 2016. Legal regulation of the use and protection of biological resources: scientific and practical manual. Moscow, INFRA-M Publ. (In Russian)

Mokhov, Aleksander A. 2015. Legal regimes of entrepreneurial activity. Sbornik nauchno-prakticheskikh statei II Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii “Aktual’nye problemy predprinimatel’skogo i korporativnogo prava v Rossii i za rubezhom” (22.03.2015 Moskva). Moscow, Iustitsinform Publ. (In Russian)

Popondopulo, Vladimir F. 1994. Legal regime of entrepreneurship. St. Petersburg, Izdatel’stvo Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta Publ. (In Russian)

Savinykh, Vladislav A. 2014. Features of legal redress regime of natural resource damage. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law 3: 148–166. (In Russian)

Smirnov, Viktor T., Sobchak, Anatolii A. 1983. The general doctrine of tort obligations in Soviet civil law: a training manual. Leningrad, Izdatel’stvo LGU Publ. (In Russian)

Sobchak, Anatolii A. 1981. Legal regulation of economic activity. Leningrad, Izdatel’stvo LGU Publ. (In Russian)

Shubin, Iurii P. 2018. Some aspects of judicial practice in disputes related to compensation for en- vironmental damage. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskoi iuridicheskoi akademii 1 (38): 58–67. (In Russian)

Vedysheva, Natalia O. 2018 Environmental insurance as a measure to prevent environmental risks. Aktual’nye problemy sovremennogo zakonodatel’stva Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Moscow: 43–48. (In Russian)

Villarroya, Ana, Jordi, Puig. 2010. Ecological compensation and Environmental Impact Assessment in Spain. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 30 (6): 357–362.

Zhavoronkova, Natalia G., Vypkhanova Galina V. 2018. Theoretical and legal problems of compensation for harm caused to the environment. Lex Russica 3 (136): 52–67. (In Russian)

Published

21.01.2020

How to Cite

Pozdnyakova, P. V. (2020). Compensation mechanism as a condition of commercial use of environmental components . Pravovedenie, 62(4), 651–670. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu25.2018.405

Issue

Section

Articles