The possessor of sovereignty

  • Michel Troper University of Paris X Nanterre (France)
  • Vasiliy Alexeevich Tokarev Samara State Regional Academy (Nayanova); University of Paris X-Nanterre (France)

Abstract

The article is devoted to the key concept for both constitutional law and the theory of state — “the holder of sovereignty”. Special attention is paid to the peculiarities of the research methodology associated with this notion of theoretical perspective and practical nature. So, the author distinguishes between the essence and the exercise of sovereignty, as well as between the descriptive and the prescriptive points of view on its content. He emphasizes that the positivist epistemology imposes the choice of descriptive terms. However, in his opinion, the choice of the descriptive point of view is not a monopoly of the positivist epistemology. In his reasoning he proceeds from the classical classification of definitions of sovereignty proposed at the time by the leading French jurist Raymond Carré de Malberg. According to his concept, the first value of sovereignty indicates the highest level occupied by a public authority. Its second meaning is synonymous with the public authority itself. Finally, the third value is associated with the position held by the highest tactical power holder, i.e. by a specific body. The author agrees with Сarré de Malberg that the differences between the values of sovereignty will allow us to discover its “true nature”. However, he notes that they have a more obvious advantage, as they allow to understand why judgments usually related to sovereignty and seemingly incompatible, are allowed within the same legal discourse. To solve this problem, the author considers the issue of indivisibility of sovereignty and complements the classification of its values with two more values. Under the new classification he establishes the relationship between the organization of power and the use of the theory of sovereignty in the discourse of the rulers with respect to sovereignty in general and to a particular theory of sovereignty. In conclusion, the author states that in the contemporary discourse about constitutional justice the reference to the sovereignty of the people or the nation is likely to disappear, and any argument of the holder of sovereignty becomes useless. Thus, it appears problematic to combine constitutional justice and democracy viewed as a form of government of the sovereign people.

Keywords:

holder of sovereignty, state, authority, Parliament, people, representative, constitution, rule, positivism, theory, constitutional control, democracy

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Michel Troper, University of Paris X Nanterre (France)

professor, member of the Institut Universitaire de France 

Vasiliy Alexeevich Tokarev, Samara State Regional Academy (Nayanova); University of Paris X-Nanterre (France)

candidate of legal sciences, Head of the department of History of State and Law; doctoral student 

References

Beaud O. The power of the State. Paris, PUF, 1994. 512 p.

Bentham J. A Fragment on Government and an Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, trans. and preface of J.-P. Cléro. Paris, LGdJ, 1996. 380 p.

Carré de Malberg R. A Comparison of the Theory of the Formation of the Law per degrees with the Ideas and the Institutions devoted by the French Substantive Law relative to its Formation. Paris, Sirey, 1933. 174 p.

Carré de Malberg R. Contribution to the General Theory of the State. Paris, Sirey, 1920, réimpr., CNRS, 1962. 2 vol., 837 p.

Crick B. Sovereignty // International Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences. T.15, 1968, pp. 76–78.

Gauchet M. The Revolution of Powers. The Sovereignty, the People and the Representation, 1789–1799. Paris, Gallimard, 1995. 288 p.

Jellinek G. The Law of the modern state. Vol. I. General Theory of the State. Berlin, 2nd ed., trans. engl., The modern State and its Law, 1905. 574 p.

Redor J.-M. The Legal Status of the Rule of Law. The Evolution of the Conceptions of the Doctrine Publicist French (1879–1914). Paris, Economica, 1992. 389 p.

Troper M. Constitutional Justice and democracy. CFER. 1990, no. 1, pp. 31–52.

Troper M. For a Legal Theory of the State. Paris, PUF, 1994. 358 p.

Zagrebelsky G. The Legal Mild. Turin, Einaudi, 1992. 218 p.

Published
2016-06-01
How to Cite
Troper, M., & Tokarev, V. A. (2016). The possessor of sovereignty. Pravovedenie, 60(3), 140-155. Retrieved from https://pravovedenie.spbu.ru/article/view/6952
Section
Public law

Most read articles by the same author(s)