Ontological domains of law

  • Marina Vladimirovna Ulmer-Bayteeva Kazan Law Institute of the Russian Law Academy of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation (RLA of the Ministry of Justice of Russia)

Abstract

Classical studies of conceptual and theoretical problems of law focus on the nature of the law as such, common and universal for any legal system. The main issues are addressed by the theory through the conceptual framework which represents the law in “general” logical and “universal” linguistic forms. However, the language of the law is nether neutral to what it represents, and it influences the existence of the law as a subject. The author follows postclassical views according to which the language is not only the method of denominating (defining) the subjects, but also a means of their understanding by a person. The law is presented to us in various forms which necessitate the analysis of these representations connected with our perception and understanding. Variety of images of the law is revealed through a phenomenological method and Husserl’s idea that the forms of representing the subjects always depend on their ontological differentiation. Husserl distinguishes between the ontology of tangible objects, events, states, and relations, as well as formal and apophantic subjects of the theory expressed through concepts and categories. discussions of the essence of the subject of law and its predicative forms allow making distinctions between “what” the law is and “how” it actually exists. The classical subject of the law included in the definition of the notion is a metaphysic construct outside of the real existence. differentiated ontology enables to illustrate that the “real world” and the “world of knowledge” belong to different types of realities which cannot be projected to one another. According to the author, the formal and logical analysis of the law is always opposed to the experience of law understanding where a person lives and acts. Law understanding is a method of interpretation which aims at reconstructing meanings from the perspectives of different agents. Law understanding aims at explicating the meaning of what expresses an action or experience of the person from an inner perspective. According to Heidegger, understanding is not achieved by special scientific methods which are directed at cognition and theoretical understanding; understanding is a practical aspect of the person’s life, connection with real life situations which project various possibilities for the law. The ability to understand the law is developed through communication and dialogue which help to reach a compromise for different agents. According to the phenomenological approach to the law, the legal knowledge is not only a social product, but also a product of individual values, experience and actions of the person. According to the author, the key aspect of the post-classical view is the question of what underlies the existence of the law as the “subject”: a language, thoughts, personal experience, actions, or social practice. This approach requires the law to be viewed through the perspective of the differentiated ontology where the law belongs to different types of reality. 

Keywords:

ontology and epistemology of law, differentiated law ontology, phenomenological method, sign forms of the law, notion of the law, semantics and pragmatics of the law, language of the law, legal communication and dialogue, essence of the law, legal values, legal acts, subject of the law and its meaning, post-classical approach to studying the law, law understanding

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Marina Vladimirovna Ulmer-Bayteeva , Kazan Law Institute of the Russian Law Academy of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation (RLA of the Ministry of Justice of Russia)

candidate of legal sciences, associate professor of the department of Civil Law and Procedure

References

Vasjukov V.L. Formal’naia fenomenologiia [Formal Phenomenology]. Moscow, 1999. 222 p. (in Russian)

Gadamer H.-G. Istina i metod: Osnovy filos. germenevtiki [Truth and Method]. Ed. by B. N. Bessonova. Moscow, Progress, 1988. 699 p. (in Russian)

Husserl E. Idei k chistoi fenomenologii i fenomenologicheskaia filosofiia. Kniga 1. Vvedenie v chistuiu fenomenologiiu [Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy]. Vol. 1. Introduction to a Pure Phenomenology. Moscow, 2009. 496 p. (in Russian)

Dragalina-Chernaja E.G. Formal’naia ontologiia kak abstraktnye logiki [Formal Ontology as Abstract Logic]. Logicheskie issledovaniia [Logical investigations]. 2005, no. 12, pp. 162–169. (in Russian)

Dragalina-Chernaja E. G. Formal’nye ontologii: analiticheskaia rekonstruktsiia. dis. d-ra filos. nauk [Formal Ontology: analytical reconstruction. doct. diss. by of Philosophy]. Moscow, 2000. 252 p. (in Russian)

Ivanov d.V. [What Is It the qualia?] Soznanie. Praktika. Real’nost’ [Consciousness. Praxis. Reality]. Ed. by I. d. dzhohadze. Moscow, 2013, pp. 30–45. (in Russian)

Maksimov S.I. [The Concept of Law Reality]. Neklassicheskaia filosofiia prava [Non-classical Law Philosophy]. Ed. by A. V. Stovba. Har’kov, 2013, pp. 31–34. (in Russian)

Merleau-Ponty M. Fenomenologiia vospriiatiia [Phenomenology of Perception]. Moscow, Nauka, Juventa, 1999. 608 p. (in Russian)

Polyakov A.V. [The communicative-phenomenological Concept of Law]. Neklassicheskaia filosofiia prava [Non-classical Law Philosophy]. Ed. by A.V.Stovba. Har’kov, 2013, pp. 94–106. (in Russian)

Ricoeur P. Spravedlivoe [The Just]. Moscow, 2005. 304 p. (in Russian)

Stovba A. V. [The temporal Ontology of Law Temporal’naja ontologija prava]. Neklassicheskaia filosofiia prava [Non-classical Law Philosophy]. Ed. by A.V.Stovba. Har’kov, 2013, pp. 127–130. (in Russian)

Slovar’ filosofskikh terminov [Dictionary of the Philosophical Terms]. Ed. by V. G. Kuznecova. Moscow, 2004. 730 p. (in Russian)

Shul’ga E.N. [Philosophy of the Mind as fundamental Problem of Epistemology]. Soznanie. Praktika. Real‘nost‘ [Consciousness. Praxis. Reality]. Ed. by I.d.dzhohadze. Moscow, 2013, pp. 69–88. (in Russian)

Chestnov I.L. [The dialogical Concept of Law]. Neklassicheskaia filosofiia prava [Non-classical Law Philosophy]. Ed. by A. V. Stovba. Har’kov, 2013, pp. 160–163. (in Russian)

Austin J. How to do things with words. Oxford, 1962. 166 p.

Brentano F. Psychologie vom empirische Standpunkte. Leipzig, Duncker&Humblot, 1874. 350 p.

Brentano F. die Lehre vom richtigen Urteil: nach den Vorlesungen über Logik mit Benützung anderer Manuskripte aus dem Gebiete der Erkenntnistheorie. Franz Brentano. Aus d. Nachlaß hrsg. von Franziska Mayer-Hillebrand. Bern, 1956. 344 p.

Carnap R. Der logische Aufbau der Welt. Hamburg, 1998. 290 p.

Derrida J. Die Schrift und die Differenz. Frankfurt, 1972. 451 p.

Dilthey W. der Aufbau der geschichtlichen Welt in den Geisteswissenschaften. Gesammelte Schriften. Bd. 7. Göttingen, 1958. 380 p.

Detel W. Logik. Bd. 1. Reclam, 2007. 168 p.

Fellmann F. Phänomenologie. Junius, 2006. 196 p.

Fodor d. Psychosemantics. The Problem of Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge, 1987. 171 p.

Gadamer H. G. Wahrheit und Methode. Tübingen, 1975. 553 p.

Ingarden R. Der Streit um die Existenz der Welt. Bd. 2. Formalontologie. Teil 1. Form und Wesen; Teil 2. Welt und Bewußtsein. Tübingen, 1965. 454 p.

Habermas J. Faktizität und Geltung. Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats. Frankfurt, 1994. 704 p.

Hartmann N. Der Aufbau der realen Welt: Grundriß der allgemeinen Kategorienlehre, von N. Hartmann. Berlin, 1940. 616 p.

Heidegger M. Sein und Zeit. Max Niemeyer. Tübingen, 1986. 445 p.

Husserl E. die Ideen der Phänomenologie. Fünf Vorlesungen. Gesammelte Werke. Bd. 2. 1 Aufl. Haag, 1950. 93 p.

Husserl E. Cartesianische Meditationen und Pariser Vorträge. Gesammelte Werke. Bd. 1. Haag, 1950. 244 p.

Husserl E. die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie. Gesammelte Werke. Bd. 6. Haag, 1954. 557 p.

Husserl E. Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Texte aus Nachlass. Erster Teil 1905–1920. Gesammelte Werke. Bd. 13. Haag, 1973. 546 p.

Husserl E. Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Texte aus Nachlass. Zweier Teil 1921–1928. Gesammelte Werke. Bd. 14. Haag, 1973. 623 p.

Husserl E. Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Texte aus dem Nachlass. Dritter Teil 1929–1935. Gesammelte Werke. Bd. 15. Haag, 1973. 741 p.

Husserl E. Formale und transzendentale Logik. Gesammelte Werke. Bd. 17. Haag, 1974. 510 p.

Husserl E. Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Neu hrsg. von R.Schuhmann. Gesammelte Werke. Bd.3. Halbbd.1. Haag, 1976. 476 p.

Husserl E. Logische Untersuchungen. Zweiter Band: Untersuchungen zur Phänomenologie und Theorie der Erkenntnis. In zwei Bänden. Gesammelte Werke. Bd. 19 (Teil 1–2). Haag, 1984, pp. 533–958.

Husserl E. Aufsätze und Vorträge (1922–1937). Bd. 27. Gesammelte Werke. Haag, 1989. 332 p.

Husserl E. Cartesianische Meditationen. Hamburg, 1995. 172 p. 68

Husserl E. Die Phänomenologische Methode. Ausgewählte Texte I. Reclam, 1998. 298 p.

Janich P. Sprache und Methode. Eine Einführung in philosophische Reflexion. UTB, 2014. 244 p.

Kaufmann F. die Kriterien des Rechts. Eine Untersuchung über die Prinzipien der juristischen Methodenlehre. Tübingen, 1924. 164 p.

Kaufmann F. Logik und Rechtswissenschaft. Grundriß eines Systems der Reiner Rechtslehre. Tübingen, 1922. 134 p.

Kelsen H. Reine Rechtslehre. Nachdruck der Aufl. 1960. Wien, 2000. 534 p.

Kelsen H. Was ist die Reine Rechtslehre? Rechtsphilosophie oder Rechtstheorie? Darmstadt, 1988. 56 p.

Liptow J. Philosophie des Geistes. Junius, 2013. 218 p.

Loidolt S. Einführung in die Rechtsphänomenologie. Tübingen, 2010. 411 p.

Ontologie. Der Brockhaus Philosophie. Idee, Denker und Begriffe. Leipzig, Mannheim, F. A. Brockhaus, 2004, pp. 242–243.

Ontologie. Metaphysics. The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy. Third edition, 2015, pp. 661–662.

Pearce C. die Festlegung einer Überzeugung. Texte zur Philosophie des Pragmatismus. Stuttgart, 1975. 255 p.

Quine W. Wort und Gegenstand. Stuttgart, Reclam, 1980. 504 p.

Reinach A. Sämtliche Werke. Textkritische Ausgabe in 2 Bänden. Bd. 1. München; Wien, 1989. 611 p.

Robles G. Rechtsregeln und Spielregeln. Eine Abhandlung zur analytischen Rechtstheorie. Wien; New york, 1987. 229 p.

Searle J. Intentionalität. Eine Abhandlung zur Philosophie des Geist. Frankfurt, 1987. 352 p.

Searle J. Speech acts. London, 1969. 204 p.

Schädelbach H. Erkenntnistheorie zur Einführung. Junius Verlag, 2002. 206 p.

Schapp W. Die neue Wissenschaft vom Recht. Bd.1. Eine phänomenologische Untersuchung. Berlin, 1930. 184 p.

Schapp W. In Geschichten verstrickt. Zum Sein von Mensch und Ding. Mensch und ding, Hamburg, 1953. 210 p.

Schapp W. Philosophie der Geschichten. Leer; Lautenberg, 1959. 334 p.

Schönrich G. Semiotik. Junius, 1999. 137 p.

Schütz A. Der sinnhafte Aufbau der sozialen Welt. Eine Einleitung in die verstehende Soziologie (1932). Wien, 1960. 285 p.

Scheller M. der Formalismus in der Ethik und die materiale Wertethik. Neuer Versuch der Grundlegung eines ethischen Personalismus. 7 Aufl. Gesammelte Werke. Bd. 2. Bonn, 2000. 676 p.

Scheller M. Schriften aus dem Nachlass. Bd. I. Zur Ethik und Erkenntnislehre. 2 Aufl. Bern, München, 1957. 583 p.

Schuhmann K. Husserl Staatstheorie. Freiburg, 1988. 216 p.

Stein E. Eine Untersuchung über den Staat. Freiburg-Basel, 2006. 168 p.

Szilasi W. Einfuehrung in die Phänomenologie Edmund Husserls. Tübingen, 1959. 142 p.

Waldenfels B. Topographie des Fremden. Frankfurt am Main, 1997. 227 p.

Waldenfels B. Grenzen der Normalisierung. Frankfurt am Main, 1998. 331 p.

Wittgenstein L. Logisch-philosophische Abhandlung. Tractatus logico-philosophicus. Kritische Edition. Frankfurt, 1998. 114 p.

Published
2016-06-01
How to Cite
Ulmer-Bayteeva , M. V. (2016). Ontological domains of law. Pravovedenie, 60(3), 34-69. Retrieved from https://pravovedenie.spbu.ru/article/view/6948
Section
Concept of law