Современные концепции права в контексте динамики научных парадигм

Olga Vladimirovna Rodionova

Authors

Olga Vladimirovna Rodionova Ivanovo State University

Abstract

The article attempts to understand the reasons for and the place of the modern legal concepts in the context of the legal culture which is seen as a set of several co-existing legal subcultures. Law in the context of a classical paradigm and law in the context of a non-classical paradigm is partially or completely existing in time. It is a linearly concept of scientific development, and various research paradigms co-exist within the same time continuum. It is possible to relate these paradigms with the vectors of general cultural development only by analyzing certain legal concepts in terms of using terminology, research methods, research styles which are part of the dominant cultural paradigm of a particular historical epoch. The classics are a kind of a constant, something eternal and unchangeable within the culture, including the legal culture. Concurrent with the classical paradigm that has been existing at all times, other paradigms coexist in the same time space reflecting certain cultural features of a particular time continuum. Legal concepts that do not fit into the classical law refer to the modern legal culture, to the postmodern legal culture, and today even to the postpostmodern legal culture. This multifaceted character of the paradigm is necessary to preserve and develop the national legal culture. Reduction to a common denominator is impossible because the advocates of a particular type of law understanding rely on different disciplinary matrices. Each of the existing legal concepts has a right to exist and the right to the truth, contextual in time and place. But none of them can claim to possess apodictical knowledge as law, being a cultural phenomenon, continues to grow along with other cultural phenomena. The aim of this deliberation is a proposal for discussion in the spirit of a tradi tional Russian essay culture rather than an attempt to reconcile the antagonistic positions or positioning of the ultimate truth.

Keywords:

law, classical paradigm, non-classical paradigm, postmodern legal culture, legal modernism decadence, postpostmodern legal culture, multifaceted character of the legal culture

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Olga Vladimirovna Rodionova , Ivanovo State University

doctor of legal sciences, associate professor, Department of Theory and History of State and Law

References

Bibler V. S. Zamysly [Conceptions]. Moscow, 2002. 1120 p. (In Russian)

Brainin-Passek V. O postmodernizme, krizise vospriiatiia i novoi klassike [On Post-Modernism, Crisis of Apperception and New Classics]. Novyi mir iskusstva, 2002, no. 5/28, pp. 7–10. (In Russian)

Gobozov I.A. Intellektual’nyi krizis obshchestva [Intellectual Crisis of Society]. Filosofiia i obshchestvo, 2010, no. 3, pp.5–21.

Gusserl’ E. Idei k chistoi fenomenologii i fenomenologicheskoi filosofii. Kniga pervaia. Obshchee vvedenie v chistuiu fenomenologiiu [Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy — First Book: General Introduction to a Pure Phenomenology]. Moscow, 2009. 496 p. (In Russian)

Irkhin Iu.V. Postmodernistskie teorii: dostizheniia i somneniia [Post-Modernistic Theories: Achievements and Doubts]. Sotsial’no-gumanitarnye znaniia [Social Humanitarian Knowledge], 2006, no. 1, pp. 261–278. (In Russian)

Liotar Zh.-F. Sostoianie postmoderna [The Postmodern Condition]. Moscow, 1988. 160 p. (In Russian)

Man’kovskaia N. Ot modernizma k postpostmodernizmu via postmodernizm [From Modernism to Postpostmodernism via Postmodernism]. Kollazh-2 [Collage-2]. Moscow, IF RAN Publ., 1999, pp. 18–25. (In Russian)

Marks K. Pis’mo V.I. Zasulich [The Letter of V.I. Zasulich]. K. Marks I F. Engel’s. Soch. [Collected Works]. Vol. 19. 2-e izd. Moscow, 1961, pp. 250–251. (In Russian)

Mitroshenkov O. Chto pridet na smenu postpozitivizmu? [What Comes to Replace Post-Positivism]. Svobodnaia mysl’, 2013, no. 5. Available at: http://www.svom.info/entry/355-chto-pridet-na-smenu-postmodernizmu/ (accessed: 02.02.2015). (In Russian)

Neklassicheskaia filosofiia prava: voprosy i otvety [Non-Classical Philosophy of Law: Questions and Responses]. Biblioteka mezhdunarodnogo zhurnala «Problemy filosofii prava» [“Philosophy of Law Problems” International Journal Library]. Khar’kov, 2013. 272 p. (In Russian)

Platonova N.V. Filosofiia prava v epokhu postmoderna [Philosophy of Law in the Age of Postmodern]. Kul’tura, dukhovnost’, obshchestvo [Culture, Spirits, Society], 2015, no. 19, pp. 81–87. (In Russian)

Poliakov A.V. Kommunikativnoe pravoponimanie: Izbr. trudy [Communicative Law Understanding: Collected Works]. St. Petersburg, Alef-Press, 2014. 575 p. (In Russian)

Poliakov A.V., Timoshina E.V. Obshchaia teoriia prava: Uchebnik [General Theory of Law: Textbook]. 2nd ed. St. Petersburg, St.-Petersburg Univ. Press, 2015. 472 p. (In Russian)

Razuvaev N. V. Sovremennaia teoriia prava v poiskakh postklassicheskoi paradigmy poznaniia [Contemporary Theory of Law in the Search of Postclassical Paradigm of Consciousness]. Pravovedenie, 2014, no. 5, pp.143–149. (In Russian)

Stovba A. V. O peremene sushchnosti, ili «Chto est’» pravo v epokhu postmetafiziki [On Change in the Meaning or “What Is” Law in the Age of Postmetaphysics]. Pravovedenie, 2008, no. 1, pp. 157–164. (In Russian)

Stovba A. V. Temporal’naia ontologiia prava [Temporal Onthology of Law]. Neklassicheskaia filosofiia prava. Biblioteka mezhdunarodnogo zhurnala «Problemy filosofii prava» [Non-Classical Philosophy of Law. “Philosophy of Law Problems” International Journal Library]. Khar’kov, 2013, pp. 127–159. (In Russian)

Stovba A.V. Chto est’ pravo? [What is Law?]. Pravovedenie, 2013, no. 4, pp.178– 186. (In Russian)

Khaidegger M. Bytie i vremia [Time and Being]. Moscow, Ad Marginem Publ., 1997. 452 p. (In Russian)

Chestnov I.L. Dialogicheskaia kontseptsiia prava [Dialogical Theory of Law]. Neklassicheskaia filosofiia prava. Biblioteka mezhdunarodnogo zhurnala «Problemy filosofii prava» [Non-Classical Philosophy of Law. “Philosophy of Law Problems” International Journal Library]. Khar’kov, 2013, pp. 160–193. (In Russian)

Chestnov I. L. Postklassicheskaia kommunikativnaia kontseptsiia prava kak «nezrimaia kollegiia» [“Postclassical” Communicative Theory of Law as “Invisible Collegium”]. Pravovedenie, 2013, no. 5, pp.112–123. (In Russian)

Chestnov I. L. Chto est’ pravo? [What is Law?]. Pravovedenie, 2013, no. 3, pp. 229– 237. (In Russian)