The problem of classism and equality in criminal law: socio-legal analysis

Authors

  • Vladimir Shikhanov Irkutsk Law Institute (branch) of the University of Prosecutor’s Office of the Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu25.2022.103

Abstract

The author problematizes the issue of equality of citizens before Criminal Code, as well as the question of classist nature of the criminal delinquency and, accordingly, criminal law. This debate has existed so far in the circle of jurists, different points of view are expressed, arguments are given. Meanwhile, the very understanding of the term “class” as applied to crime or criminal law has changed over time. The paper describes how the discourse on classism has changed, the positions of the Constitutional Court of Russia on equality are presented. Based on the data of judicial statistics, the author points to stable patterns when less severe penalties are imposed for crimes considered to be more serious in law. This phenomenon, which may seem paradoxical in terms of the doctrine of criminal law, has a criminological explanation. In all such cases, the courts respond to the social characteristics of the criminals: the defendants for more serious crimes are those who have used their official position, but these same persons have positive characteristics, they are socialized to the maximum extent possible. And on the contrary, those who committed less serious crimes did not have a someone official position and in general, for the most part, are representatives of lower social strata. The author substantiates the thesis that the theoretical and methodological features of the current criminal law, in particular the mechanisms for differentiating criminal liability and the system of criminal penalties, do not adequately take into account the social characteristics of crime, the actual system of social values in Russian society, and the features of social stratification. The entire system of criminal punishments and the vast majority of sanctions in the articles of the Special Part of the Criminal Code of Russia are based on a certain model of the hierarchy of the system of social values. At the same time, sociological studies make it possible to find that the indicated hierarchy model is divorced from reality, and therefore the criminal law is not an adequate reflection of real social relations. The author proposes to change the methodology of building a system of criminal penalties and sanctions in the articles of the Special part of the Criminal code. At the same time, it recognizes as a utopia the hope of ensuring equality of citizens before the law by establishing common and identical scales for all with a universal gradation of the severity of criminal penalties, since they contradict social reality.

Keywords:

criminal liability, differentiation of responsibility, social stratification, class approach, legal equality

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Arzamastsev, Maksim V. 2016. Imbalance of punishability of corruption and economic crimes. Kriminologicheskie osnovy ugolovnogo prava: Materialy X Rossiiskogo kongressa ugolovnogo prava (26–27 may 2016). Moscow, Iurlitinform Publ. 21–26. (In Russian)

Babaev, Mikhael M., Zvonov, Andrey V., Kilimbaev, Roman V., Kruglikov, Lev L., Lapshin, Valeriy F., Pudovochkin, Juriy E., Rozenko, Stanislav V. 2018. Criminal punishment: socio-legal analysis, systematization and development trends: monograph. Moscow, Iurlitinform Publ. (In Russian)

Becker, Gary S. 2003. Human behavior. Economical Approach. Moscow, GU VShE Publ. (In Russian)

Boskholov, Sergey S., Maksimov, Sergey V. 2018. Criminal law policy: experience, problems and ways to improve. Prolog: zhurnal o prave 3: 8–18. https://doi.org/10.21639/2313-6715.2018.3.2 (In Russian)

Criminology. 3rd ed. 2003. Ed. Sheley, Joseph F. St Petersburg, Piter Publ. (In Russian)

Derzhavin, Konstantin N. 1946. Voltaire. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR Publ. (In Russian)

d’Holbach, Paul-Henri T. 1963. Selected Works: In 2 Volumes. 2nd Vol. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo Sotsial’noekonomicheskoi literatury Publ. (In Russian)

Epifantseva, Elena V. 2008. Who does the criminal law protect? Obshchestvo i parvo 2: 90–92. (In Russian)

Filimonov, Vadim D. 2003. The protective function of criminal law. St Petersburg, Iuridicheskii tsentr Press Publ.(In Russian)

Gadzhiev, Gadis A. 2014. Constitutional foundations of legal responsibility and constitutional legal responsibility. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava 1: 7–15. (In Russian)

Golenkova, Zinaida T., Goliusova, Julia V., Orekhova, Inessa M. 2019. Contradictions and problems of modernizing the social structure of modern Russian society. Rossiia reformiruiushchaiasia: ezhegodnik 17: 311–331. (In Russian)

Gorshkov, Mikhail K. 2020. Dynamics of social transformation of modern Russia in the socio-economic, political, socio-cultural and ethno-religious context. Rossiiskii nauchnyi fond. Available at: https://rscf.ru/prjcard_int?17-28-00010 (accessed: 30.12.2019). (In Russian)

Malakhov, Valeriy P., Mikhailova, Natalia V. (Eds). History of political and legal teachings: studies. Stipend. 3rd ed. 2015. Moscow, IuNITI-DANA Publ. (In Russian)

Kleimenov, Ivan M. 2012. Comparative criminology: a monograph. Moscow, Norma Publ.: Infra-M Publ. (In Russian)

Kruglikov, Lev L., Vasil’evskii, Alexander V. 2003. Differentiation of responsibility in criminal law. St Petersburg, Iuridicheskii tsentr Press Publ. (In Russian)

Kuznetsova, Ninel F. 1969. Crime and criminality. Moscow, Moscow University Press. (In Russian)

Lenin, Vladimir I. 1970. Complete works. 5th ed. Vol. 39. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo Politicheskoi literatury Publ. (In Russian)

Lesnievski-Kostareva, Tatiana A. 1998. Differentiation of criminal responsibility. Theory and legislative practice. Moscow, Norma Publ. (In Russian)

Liass, Natalia V. 1977. Problems of guilt and criminal responsibility in modern bourgeois theories. Leningrad, Izdatel’stvo Leningradskogo universiteta Publ. (In Russian)

Magun, Vladimir, Rudnev, Maxim. 2008. Vital values of the Russian population: similarities and differences in comparison with other European countries. Vestnik obshchestvennogo mneniia 1 (93): 33–58. (In Russian)

Marat Dofman. 2010. Israeli Criminal Law Act. Moscow, Direkt-Media Publ. (In Russian)

Marks, Karl, Engels, Friedrikh. 1907. Literary legacy. Vol. 1. Moscow, Mir Publ. (Russian Edition)

Mikhailov, Anton M. 2019. Philosophy of Law: Classic Legalism and the Historical School of Jurisprudence: a textbook for undergraduate and graduate studies. 2nd ed. Moscow, Iurait Publ. (In Russian)

Naumov, Anatoliy V. 2007. Russian criminal law: a course of lectures: in 3 volumes. Vol. 1. Common part, 4th ed. Moscow, Wolters Kluwer Publ. (In Russian)

Naumov, Anatoliy V. 2012. On the reality of the scientific concept of criminal policy. Sovremennye problemy ugolovnoi politiki: materialy III Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii (28 sep. 2012). Vol 1. Krasnodar, Krasnodarskii universitet MVD Rossii Publ.: 24–33. (In Russian)

Nersesiants, Vladik S. 2009. History of political and legal doctrines: textbook. Moscow, Norma Publ. (In Russian)

Nikulin, Viktor V. 2013. Justice and politics: the relationship between politics and law in the Soviet system of punishments. Genesis: istoricheskie issledovaniia 5: 1–59. https://doi.org/10.7256/2306-420X. 2013.5.747 (In Russian)

Petrov, Alexander V. 2008. Value preferences of young people: diagnostics and trends of changes. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia 2: 83–90. (In Russian)

Pobegailo, Eduard F. 2012. On the deepening crisis of Russian criminal policy. Sovremennye problemy ugolovnoi politiki: materialy III Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii (28 sep. 2012). Vol. 1. Krasnodar, Krasnodarskii universitet MVD Rossii Publ.: 14–24. (In Russian)

Repetskaia, Anna L. 1994. Guilty behavior of the victim and problems of implementing the principle of justice in criminal policy: monograph. Irkutsk, Izdatel’stvo Irkutskogo universiteta Publ. (In Russian)

Rogova, Evgenia V. 2014. The doctrine of differentiation of criminal responsibility: monograph. Moscow, Iurlitinform Publ. (In Russian)

Gorshkov, Mikhael K., Anikin, Vasiliy A., Drobizheva, Leokadia M., Kolennikova, Nina D., Latov, Yurii V., Latova, Nataliia V., Lezhnina, Yuliia P., Mareeva, Svetlana V., Petukhov, Vladimir V., Petukhov, Roman V., Slobodeniuk, Ekaterina D., Tikhonova, Natalia E., Sheregi, Franz E. 2018. Russian society after the presidential election-2018: request for change: information and analytical report. Moscow, FGBUN FNISTs RAN Publ. Available at: http://www.isras.ru/files/File/publ/Ros_obschestvo_posle_prezident_vyborov_2018.pdf. (accessed: 30.12.2019). (In Russian)

Sabitov, Rashid A., Sabitov, Timur R. 2012. On the inconsistency of certain norms of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation with the principle of equality of citizens before the law, regardless of property and official status. Vestnik IuUrGU. Seriia “Pravo” 29: 69–74. (In Russian)

Shestakov, Dmitriy A. 2015. Crime theory and the basics of industry criminology: favorites. St Petersburg, Iuridicheskii tsentr Publ. (In Russian)

Sorokin, Pitirim A. 2006. Crime and punishment, feat and reward: a sociological study of the main forms of social behavior and morality. Moscow, Astrel’ Publ., 2006. (In Russian)

Spiridonova, Olga E., Kruglikov, Lev L. 2005. Legal constructions and symbols in criminal law. Saint Petersburg, Iuridicheskii tsentr Publ. (In Russian)

Sundurov, Feodor R., Tarkhanov, Ildar A. (Eds). 2016. The criminal law of Russia. General Part: Tutorial. 2nd ed. Moscow, Statut Publ. (In Russian)

Volkov, Vadim V. 2014. Influence of the defendant’s social status on the court’s decision. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial’noi antropologii XVII, vol. 4: 62–85. (In Russian)

Volkov, Grigory I. 1935. The class nature of crime and Soviet criminal law. Moscow, Sovetskoe zakonodatel’stvo Publ. (In Russian)

Zhalinskii, Alfred E. 2008. Criminal law pending change. Theoretical and instrumental analysis. Moscow, Prospekt Publ. (In Russian)

Published

03.10.2022

How to Cite

Shikhanov, V. (2022). The problem of classism and equality in criminal law: socio-legal analysis. Pravovedenie, 66(1), 43–68. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu25.2022.103

Issue

Section

Articles