Судьи, политическая власть и общий интерес

G. Grandjean; V. A. Tokarev

Authors

G. Grandjean University of Liège (Belgium)
V. A. Tokarev

Abstract

The article is devoted to the new status of judges in the system of separation of powers and the important role they play in the implementation of political power. The author finds the reasons for these changes in raising the level of legitimacy of judges while maintaining their constitutional and legal status. In the author’s opinion, legitimacy and social acceptability of actions of a political actor is based simultaneously on the person’s ideas about their duty to obey and their voluntary participation in solving common problems. As conditions of the power legitimacy, the author notes its ability to create legal norms, to proclaim moral values and to stabilize the political system. Having examined specific judicial decisions of the courts of France, Belgium and Canada, as well as the Court of Justice of the European Union over the past twenty years, the author comes to the conclusion about the availability of all three conditions of legitimacy of modern judges as political representatives of the people. They are closer to private persons than other political actors because they do not operate with abstract categories, but rather respond to specific complaints of citizens. At the same time, the author warns that there is a risk of preference of individual interests to the general interest in the judicial procedure which can lead to the rupture of social relations in a democratic society. Finally, he concludes that the careful attitude to the role of the judge as a political representative is very important.

Keywords:

judge, political power, representative, legitimacy, Constitution, rule, democracy, rights, society

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

G. Grandjean, University of Liège (Belgium)

doctor of political and social sciences, lecturer at the Faculty of Law, Political Science and Criminology

References

Braud Ph. Du pouvoir en général au pouvoir politique [From the Power in General to Political Power]. Traité de science politique. T. 1. La science politique, science sociale. L’ordre politique [Treaty of Political Science. Vol. 1. Political Science, Social Science. The Political Order]. Grawitz M., Leca J. (dir.). Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, 1985, рp. 335–393. (In French)

Braud Ph. Sociologie politique [Political Sociology]. Paris, Librairie Générale de Droit et de Jurisprudence, coll. “Manuel”, 2008. 788 p. (In French)

Burdeau G. Traité de Science Politique. T. 1. Le pouvoir politique [Treaty of Political Science. T. I. The Political Power]. Paris, Librairie Générale de Droit et de Jurisprudence, 1966. 664 p. (In French)

Des Cressonnieres J. La Belgique et le Droit [Belgium and the Law]. Entretiens sur La Belgique Contemporaine [ Interviews on Contemporary Belgium]. Bruxelles, Larcier, 1904, pp. 135–157. (In French)

Dormagen J.-Y., Mouchard D.Introduction à la sociologie politique [Introduction to Political Sociology]. 3e éd. Bruxelles, De Boeck, coll. “Ouvertures politiques”, 2010. 271 p. (In French)

Easton D.A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1965. 532 p.

Garapon A.La question du juge [The Judge’s Question]. Pouvoirs [Powers]. 1995, n° 74, pp. 13–26. (In French)

Hanus G. L’épreuve du collectif [The Test of the Collective]. Lagrasse, Verdier, 2016. 89 p. (In French)

Martens P.Réflexions sur le nouvel art de juger [Reflections on the New Art of Judging]. Jurisprudence de Liège, Mons et Bruxelles [Jurisprudence of Liège, Mons and Brussels]. 2012, n° 12, pp. 568–587. (In French)

Œuvres complètes de Montesquieu, avec des notes de Dupin, Crevier, Voltaire, Mably, Servan, La Harpe, etc., etc. [The Complete Works of Montesquieu, with Notes of Dupin, Crevier, Voltaire, Mably, Servan, La Harpe, etc.]. Paris, Firmin Didot Frères, 1838. 920 p. (In French)

Pâques M. L’action politique du juge. En particulier celle du juge de l’administration [The political action of the judge. In particular that of the judge of the administration]. Les juges: décideurs politiques? Essais sur le pouvoir politique des juges dans l’exercice de leur function [Judges: Political Decision-Makers? Essays on the Political Power of Judges in the Exercise of Their Function]. Grandjean G., Wildemeersch J. (dir.). Bruxelles, Bruylant, 2016, pp. 133–169. (In French)

Voyé L., Dobbelaere K., Abts K. et Kerkhofs J. Introduction. Autres temps, autres mœurs. Travail, famille, éthique, religion et politique: la vision des Belges [Other Times, Other Manners. Work, Family, Ethics, Religion and Politics: the Vision of the Belgians]. Voyé L., Dobbelaere K., Abts K. (éd.). Bruxelles, Racine Campus, 2012, pp.3–22. (In French)

Wildemeersch J. Bref propos conclusif sur les fonctions politiques des juges. Le juge et le citoyen: qui se trouve de l’autre côté du miroir? [Brief about Conclusive on the Political Functions of the Judges. The Judge and the Citizen: Who is on the Other Side of the Mirror?]. Les juges: décideurs politiques? Essais sur le pouvoir politique des juges dans l’exercice de leur function [Judges: Political Decision-Makers? Essays on the Po- litical Power of Judges in the Exercise of Their Function]. Grandjean G., Wildemeersch J. (dir.). Bruxelles, Bruylant, 2016, pp. 347–359. (In French)