Антропологический подход в науке о праве: основные проблемы и попытки их решения (рецензия на статью С. А. Калинина «О закономерностях генезиса и развития антрополого-правового знания»)

Nikolai Viktorovich Razuvaev

Authors

Nikolai Viktorovich Razuvaev North-West Institute of Management of the Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7654-6315

Abstract

The paper is a review of an article by S. А. Кalinin “Concerning consistent patterns of genesis and development of the anthropological and legal knowledge” published in this issue of the journal “Jurisprudence”. According to the author of the article, the anthropological approach in the science of law is one of the most typical manifestations of the so-called “post-classical” (or “post-non-classical”) paradigm of the scientific cognition widespread in the last decade of the 20th century and in the early 21st century. The post-non-classical paradigm of the scientific, including legal, cognition is characterized by a number of typical features, the most important of which is the recognition of an active role of an agent, that is a person acting to a fullest extent of his/her cognitive and practical abilities in designing different types of reality, including the legal reality. The above circumstance turns the anthropological approach into an ideological, as well as theoretical and methodological foundation of sciences of law. At the same time, the author objects to the attempts to fill the anthropology with the religious and other epistemologically irrelevant content which have recently become popular. The review gives a detailed justification of the author’s position which can serve to further deepening of the studies of the human dimension of the law which are relevant to the post-classical science of law.

Keywords:

post-non-classical knowledge, complex self-developing system, radical constructivism, law, legal reality, anthropological approach

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Nikolai Viktorovich Razuvaev , North-West Institute of Management of the Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

candidate of legal sciences, professor

References

Achromeeva T.S., Malinetski G.G., Posashkov S.A. Kontseptsii postneklassiki i razvitie nauchnogo znaniia v XXI veke [Concept of post-non-classics and the development of scientific knowledge in the twenty-first century]. Filosofskie nauki [Philosophical Sciences], 2014, no. 3, pp. 30–46. (In Russian)

Alekseeva D.A. Klassika, neklassika, postneklassika: prokrustovo lozhe skhemy [Classics, non-classics, post-non-classics: Procrustean bed of schema]. Epistemologiia i filosofiia nauki [Epistemology and philosophy of science], 2011, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 69–78. (In Russian)

Batkin L. M. Evropeiskii chelovek naedine s soboi. Ocherki o kul’turno-istoricheskikh osnovaniiakh i predelakh lichnogo samosoznaniia [European man alone. Essays on the cultural and historical reasons and limits of personal identity]. Moscow, RGGU Publ, 2000. 1005 p. (In Russian)

Con I.S. Otkrytie “Ia” [Discovery of “Me”]. Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1978. 367 p. (In Russian)

Fuhrmann M. Persona, roemischer Rollenbegriff [Persona, Roman role term]. Identität [Identity]. Hrsg. v. O. Marquard und K. Stierle. München, Fink Publ., 1979. 765 p. (In German)

Kant I. [Prolegomena to any future metaphysics, which appear as science]. Kant I. Sochineniia: v 6 t. [Works. In 6 vols]. Vol. 4, part. 1. Moscow, Mind Publ., 1965, pp. 67–210. (In Russian)

Karpin V. A., Gudkov S. A., Zhivoglyad R. N., Kozupica G. S. Tipy nauchnoi ratsional’nosti v aspekte trekh paradigm [Types of scientific rationality in the aspect of three paradigms]. Slozhnost’. Razum. Postneklassika [Complexity. Reason. Post-non- classics], 2015, no. 1, pp. 22–30. (In Russian)

Losev A. F. Istoriia antichnoi estetiki. Ranniaia klassika [History of ancient aesthetics: early classics]. Moscow, AST, Folio Publ., 2000. 624 p. (In Russian)

Mikhaylov A.V. [To the history of the character]. Chelovek i kul’tura [People and culture]. Ed. by A. Ya. Gurevich. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1990. 238 p. (In Russian)

Polyakova Ya. S. Aktual’nye problemy postneklassicheskoi nauki: smena nauchnoi paradigmy i tipa nauchnoi ratsional’nosti [Topical problems of post-non-classic science: changing the scientific paradigm and the type of scientific rationality]. Filosofiia sotsial’nykh kommunikatsii [Philosophy of social communications], 2010, no.1 (10), pp.10–23. (In Russian)

Spengler O. Zakat Evropy. Ocherki morfologii mirovoi istorii. T.1. Obraz i deistvitel’nost’ [Sunset of Europe. Essays on the morphology of world history. Vol.1. Image and reality]. Moscow, Mind Publ., 1993. 606 p. (In Russian)

Stepin V.S. Istoricheskie tipy nauchnoi ratsional’nosti: problemy demarkatsii i preemstvennosti [Historical types of scientific rationality: the problem of demarcation and continuity]. Filosofiia, metodologiia i istoriia nauki [Philosophy, methodology and history of science], 2015, no. 1, pp. 6–27. (In Russian)

Stepin V. S. Osobennosti nauchnogo poznaniia i kriterii tipov nauchnoi ratsional’nosti [Peculiarities of scientific knowledge and scientific rationality types criteria]. Epistemologiia i filosofiia nauki [Epistemology and philosophy of science], 2013, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 78–91. (In Russian)

Vernant J.-P. Mythe et pensée chez les Grecs. Etudes de psychologie historique [Myth and thought among the Greeks. Studies of historical psychology]. Paris, Maspero Publ., 1971. 331 p. (In French)

Zorkiy P.M., Lubnina I.E. Supramolekuliarnaia khimiia: vozniknovenie, razvitie, perspektivy [Supramolecular chemistry: the origin, evolution and perspectives]. Vestnik of Moskow State University. Ser. 2. Chemistry, 1999, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 300–307. (In Russian)