Проблемы определения временных и территориальных пределов юрисдикции международных уголовных судебных учреждений

Igor S.  Marusin

Authors

Igor S. Marusin St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

Abstract

The article considers the problem of delimitation of temporal and territorial jurisdiction of international criminal judicial institutions and of the states where such international bodies have performed or perform their activity. From this point of view, the author divides all international criminal judicial institutions in three groups. The first group includes, in particular, the Nuremberg Tribunal which had jurisdiction over all crimes committed by the defendants during the Second World War, irrespective of the place where these crimes had been committed. The second group includes, in particular, the International Tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda established by the UN Security Council. Their jurisdiction is limited only to the territory of the relevant states and to the time periods indicated in the resolutions of the UN Security Council. The third group includes the International Criminal Court which has jurisdiction only over the territory of the member states within the period of validity of the Court Statute for the state concerned. Special attention is paid to the situation when the borders of a member state are changed. Such a situation arose in 2016 when the Pre-Trial Chamber of the International Criminal Court authorized the Prosecutor to investigate the crimes committed during the armed conflict in South Ossetia in 2008. However South Ossetia proclaimed its independence from Georgia in 1992 and is not a member state of the International Criminal Court. The author poses a question: who shall define the territorial limits of the ICC jurisdiction in cases when the state affiliation of a certain territory is disputable? In the author’s opinion, the International Criminal Court as an international intergovernmental organization has a right to define its position on any legally relevant issue of an international life. However, its position is not binding for other states and international organizations and may not preclude them from taking another position and acting according to it, including the refusal from cooperation with the ICC in the investigation of a disputable situation. To enhance the authority and justification of the ICC solutions to similar political issues related, in particular, to the international and legal status of a given territory, the author proposes to refer such issues to the Assembly of States Parties.

Keywords:

international law, international criminal law, international criminal judicial institutions, jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court, international justice, conflict in South Ossetia

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Igor S. Marusin, St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

doctor of legal sciences, professor

References

Gallant K. S. The International Criminal Court in the system of states and international organizations. Leiden journal of international law, 2003, no. 3, pp. 551–572.

Kapustin A. Ya. Pravovoi status Mezhdunarodnogo Ugolovnogo Suda [Legal status of the International Criminal Court]. Rossiiskii ezhegodnik mezhdunarodnogo prava [Russian Yearbook of International Law]. Special edition. St. Petersburg, Rossiya-Neva Publ., 2003, pp. 17–26. (In Russian)

Keniwe N. Otvetstvennost’ po zashchite i krizis v Darfure [Responsibility and crisis in Darfur]. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo — International Law [Mezhdunarodnoe pravo — International Law], 2005, no. 3, pp. 217–269. (In Russian)

Raginskiy M.Yu., Rosenblit S.Ya. Mezhdunarodnyi protsess glavnykh voennykh prestupnikov [International process of the main military criminals]. Moscow, Leningrad, Publishing house of the Academy of Science, 1950, 264 p. (In Russian)

Shirokorad A.B. Gruziia: zakavkazskii tupik? [Georgia: transcaucasian impasse?]. Moscow, Veche Publ., 2010, 416 p. (In Russian)

Van Reybrouck D. Kongo. En historia. Stockholm, Natur&Kultur, 2012. 633 p.

Volevodz A.G., Volevodz V.A. Sovremennaia sistema mezhdunarodnoi ugolovnoi iustitsii: khrestomatiia [Modern system of international criminal justice]. Moscow, Yurlitinform Publ., 2009, 533 p. (In Russian)

Yusupov M. R. Reshenie Mezhdunarodnogo ugolovnogo suda o vydache ordera na arest glavy Sudana Omara Khasana al’-Bashira [International Criminal Court decision to give out arrest warrant for Sudan president Omar Hasan al-Bashir]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii [Herald of Moscow University of the interior ministry of Russia], 2012, no. 3, pp. 89–93. (In Russian)