О закономерностях генезиса и развития антрополого-правового знания

Sergey A.  Kalinin

Authors

Sergey A. Kalinin Belarusian State University https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8582-9990

Abstract

The article deals with consistent patterns of the genesis of anthropological and legal knowledge. The inherent complexity and universality of the human essence causes the existence of subject-matter and methodological phenomena that differ in level and scope of reality. It is suggested to consider the following levels and sections of the anthropological knowledge: substantial and instrumental ones; a worldview one; biological and social ones which are united in the category of “anthropology”. Anthropology can simultaneously be considered as a basis for cognition of the objective reality or act as a goal and object of cognition, and, being a worldview form, it can have a methodological status of a research program. Herewith the anthropological knowledge, even without appealing to the worldview level, immanently considers it. The ambiguous nature of the anthropology generates uncertainty in the status of anthropological and legal disciplines which can overcome in the logic of changing scientific paradigms. The anthropological and legal knowledge can simultaneously manifest itself in the form of a separate science, a part of the science, an interdisciplinary direction within which theoretical and empirical levels are singled out. The anthropological and legal knowledge can develop in the methodological and subject-matter directions. In the first case the methodological status of the anthropological research and the subject spheres generated by them are comprehended. In the second case the specific subject sphere and the methods of its formation are considered. It is proposed to use the definitions “anthropological (anthropological and legal) knowledge” describing a complex of the subject-matter phenomena and “anthropological (anthropological and legal) studies” characterizing a complex of the methodological phenomena as generalizing categories. The dynamics of inclusion and exclusion of human problems into the subject-matter and methodology of cognition, as well as constant expansion of the research subject moving to the ultimate methodological generalizations are singled out as main regularities in the development of the anthropological and legal knowledge. The mentioned consistent patterns affect the development of the anthropological and legal knowledge in the social, biological and philosophical (worldview) dimensions.

Keywords:

anthropology, anthropological knowledge, anthropological and legal knowledge, anthropological dimension of jurisprudence, anthropological dimensions of the worldview research program in jurisprudence, anthropology of law, anthropological paradigm, anthropological approach in jurisprudence, methodology of legal science, worldview research program in jurisprudence

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Sergey A. Kalinin, Belarusian State University

candidate of legal sciences, associate professor, head of the Department of Theory and History of State and Law, Law Faculty

References

Abushenko V.L. Filosofskaia antropologiia [Philosophical Anthropology]. Noveishii filosofskii slovar’ [The newest philosophical dictionary]. Minsk, 2003, pp. 1095–1097. (In Russian)

Agafonova E. A. Iuridicheskaia antropologiia: kontseptual’nye idei i printsipy [Legal anthropology: conceptual ideas and principles] (PhD Thesis). Rostov-on-Don, Rostov Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation, 2009. 23 p. (In Russian)

Ahnazarov A. E. Fenomen prava [The phenomenon of law]. CREDO NEW teoreticheskii zhurnal, 2011, no. 3. Available at: http://credonew.ru/content/view/1038/65 (accessed: 5 November 2016). (In Russian)

Anohin Yu. [On the local legal system social anthropology (science-research aspects)]. Antropologіia prava: fіlosofs’kii ta iuridichnii vimіri (stan, problemi, perspektivi): materіali Pershogo vseukraїns’kogo kruglogo stolu, m. L’vіv, 16–17 veresnia 2005 r. [The Material of the First All-Ukrainian Round Table “Anthropology of law: the philosophical and juridical measurements (state, problems, perspective)”]. Lviv, 2006, pp.15–26. (In Ukrainian)

Anohin Yu. Yury’dy’chna antropologiya: do xaraktery’sty’ky’ yiyi predmeta [Legal anthropology: to the specification of the subject]. Byuleten’ Ministerstva yusty’ciyi Ukrayiny’, 2004, no. 7, pp. 100–110. (In Ukrainian)

Bazhanov V.A. Dopolnitel’nosti (princip) [Additions (principle)]. Entsiklopediia epistemologii i filosofii nauki [Encyclopedia of epistemology and philosophy of science]. Moscow, 2009. p. 210. (In Russian)

Bigun V. [Anthropology of Law: object, system, methodology, status and functions]. Materialy Pershogho vseukrajinsjkogho krughlogho stolu “Antropologhija prava: filosofsjkyj ta jurydychnyj vymiry (stan, problemy, perspektyvy)” [The Material of the First All-Ukrainian Round Table “Anthropology of law: the philosophical and juridical measurements (state, problems, perspective)”]. Lviv, 2006, pp. 43–58. (In Ukrainian)

Chelovek i pravo: kniga o Letnei shkole po iuridicheskoi antropologii [The person and the right: the book about Summer school on legal anthropology]. Ed. by N. I. Novikova, V. A. Tishkov. Moscow, 1999. 196 p. (In Russian)

Chestnov I.L. Postklassicheskaia teoriia prava [Postclassical theory of law]. St. Petersburg, 2012. 649 p. (In Russian)

Chestnov I. L. Sotsiokul’turnaia antropologiia prava kak postklassicheskaia nauchno- issledovatel’skaia programma [Socio-cultural anthropology of law as a post-classical research program]. Russian journal of legal studies, 2014, no. 4, pp. 77–84. (In Russian)

Dorofeev D.Yu. Problemy sovremennoi filosofskoi antropologii: spontannost’ i suverennost’ cheloveka [Problems of modern philosophical anthropology: spontaneity and sovereignty of man]. Vestnik Leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta imeni A. S. Pushkina [Bulletin of the Leningrad State University named after A. S. Pushkin], 2009, no. 3, vol. 2, pp. 162–171. (In Russian)

Dowd N.E. Masculinities and Feminist Legal Theory. Wisconsin Journal of Law, Gender & Society, 2008, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 201–248.

Engel’s, F. Proiskhozhdenie sem’i, chastnoi sobstvennosti i gosudarstva [Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State]. Moscow. 1988. 244 p. (In Russian)

Feminist Philosophy of Law. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-law/ (accessed: 18.11.2016).

Filosofiya prava: problemy` i pidxody` [Philosophy of Law: Challenges and Approaches]. Ed. by P.M.Rabіnovich. Lviv, 2005. 332 p. (In Ukrainian)

Fineman M. A. Feminist Legal Theory. Journal of Gender, Social Policy & The Law, 2005, Vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 13–23.

Gagen S. Ya. Vizantiiskoe pravosoznanie IV–XV vv. [Byzantine sense of justice IV–XV centuries]. Moscow, 2012, 301 p. (In Russian)

Gobbs T. Sochineniia: v 2 t. T. 1 [Works: In 2 vols]. Vol. 1. Moscow, 1989, 621 p. (In Russian)

Gorbun G. S. Antropologiia prava i “antropologicheskii povorot” v istorii prava [Anthropology of law and “anthropological turn” in the history of law]. Vox Medii Aevi, 2015, no. 2–3, pp. XIII–XVIII. (In Russian)

Gudy`ma D.A. [Anthropological paradigm as a manifestation of general studies antropolohizatsiyi rights]. Praci L`vivs`koyi laboratoriyi prav lyudy`ny` i gromadyany`na Naukovo-doslidnogo insty`tutu derzhavnogo budivny`cztva ta miscevogo samovryaduvannya Akademiyi pravovy`x nauk Ukrayiny` “Prava lyudy`ny`: social`no-antropologichny`j vy`mir” [The works of the Lviv laboratory on human rights and the citizen’s research Institute of state building and local government of Ukrainian Academy of Legal Sciences “Human rights: a socioantropological dimenshion”], 2006, i. 13, pp. 16–64. (In Ukrainian)

Homo Juridicus. Ed. by N. I. Novikova, Moscow, Strategiia Publ., 1997. 224 p.

Horuzhij S. S. Fonar’ Diogena. Kriticheskaia retrospektiva evropeiskoi antropologii [Lantern of Diogenes. Critical retrospective of European anthropology]. Moscow, 2010. 688 p. (In Russian)

Horuzhij S. S. Ocherki sinergiinoi antropologii [Essays on synergistic anthropology]. Moscow, 2005. 408 p. (In Russian)

Hvostova K.V. Vizantiiskaia tsivilizatsiia kak istoricheskaia paradigma [Byzantine civilization as a historical paradigm]. St. Petersburg, 2009. 206 p. (In Russian)

Ilyin I.A. O sushchnosti pravosoznaniia [On the Essence of Legal Consciousness]. Moscow, 1993. 234 p. (In Russian)

Imperskaia antropologiia [Imperial Anthropology]. Akademicheskii slovar’ teorii i istorii imperii [Academic Dictionary of Theory and History of Empires]. St. Petersburg, 2012, pp. 176–180. (In Russian)

Jeroslow Ph. Anthropological Theories of Crime and Delinquency. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 2011, no. 21, pp. 255–269.

Kalinin S. A. [Methodological dimension of Christian anthropology in legal science]. Sbornik nauchnyh trudov “Eticheskie i antropologicheskie harakteristiki sovremennogo prava v situacii metodologicheskogo pljuralizma” [Collection of scientific works “Ethical and anthropological characteristics of modern law in a situation of methodological pluralism”]. Minsk, 2015, pp. 145–152. (In Russian)

Kalinin S.A. [World outlook bases of organization of public authority and legal system of society: methodological analysis]. Osnovy ustoichivogo razvitiia natsional’noi pravovoi sistemy v XXI stoletii: metodologiia, teoriia, praktika: kollektivnaia monografiia [Fundamentals of sustainable development of the national legal system in the 21st century: methodology, theory, practice]. Minsk, 2016, pp. 194–204. (In Russian)

Kalinin S.A., Pavlov V.I., Chubkovec S.N. Pravovaia politika Respubliki Belarus’ v tsivilizatsionno-kul’turnom kontekste (doktrinal’nyi i normativnyi aspekty) [Legal Policy of the Republic of Belarus in the Civilizational and Cultural Context (Doctrinal and Regulatory Aspects)]. Pravo.by, 2014, no. 4, pp. 25–32. (In Russian)

Kant I. Antropologiia s pragmaticheskoi tochki zreniia [Anthropology from a pragmatic point of view]. St. Petersburg, 1999. 471 p. (In Russian)

Kazhdan V.P. Vizantiiskaia kul’tura (X–XII vv.). [Byzantine Culture (10th–12th centuries)]. St. Petersburg, 2006. 280 p. (In Russian)

Kirill (Gundjaev), mitropolit Smolenskij i Kaliningradskij. Norma very kak norma zhizni. Problema sootnosheniia mezhdu traditsionnymi i liberal’nymi tsennostiami v vybore lichnosti i obshchestva [The norm of faith as the norm of life. The problem of the correlation of traditional and liberal values in the choice of the individual and society]. Cerkov.ru, 2000, no. 2. Available at: http://lib.cerkov.ru/preview/1909 (5 November 2016). (In Russian)

Kolodij N. A. Sotsial’no-antropologicheskoe znanie: spetsifika diskursa i osobennosti issledovatel’skikh praktik [Socio-Anthropological Knowledge: Specificity of Discourse and Features of Research Practices]. Vestnik nauki Sibiri [Bulletin of Siberian Science], 2011, no. 4, pp. 519–522. (In Russian)

Kozyubra M. [Even thinking: anthropological aspect]. Materialy Chetvertogo vseukrajinsjkogho krughlogho stolu “Antropologhija prava: filosofsjkyj ta jurydychnyj vymiry (stan, problemy, perspektyvy)” [The Material of the Fourth All-Ukrainian Round Table “Anthropology of law: the philosophical and juridical measurements (state, problems, perspective)”], Lviv, 2008, pp. 89–101. (In Ukrainian)

Kozyubra M. [On the subject of legal anthropology]. Materialy Pershogho vseukrajinsjkogho krughlogho stolu “Antropologhija prava: filosofsjkyj ta jurydychnyj vymiry (stan, problemy, perspektyvy)” [The Material of the First All-Ukrainian Round Table “Anthropology of law: the philosophical and juridical measurements (state, problems, perspective)”]. Lviv, 2006, pp. 179–189. (In Ukrainian)

Kravchenko A. [The Anthropological Principle in the Philosophy of Law: A Sutnisna Characteristics]. Materialy Chetvertogo vseukrajinsjkogho krughlogho stolu “Antropologhija prava: filosofsjkyj ta jurydychnyj vymiry (stan, problemy, perspektyvy)” [The Material of the Fourth All-Ukrainian Round Table “Anthropology of law: the philosophical and juridical measurements (state, problems, perspective)”]. Lviv, 2008, pp. 101–114. (In Ukrainian)

Kruss V.I. Lichnostnye (“somaticheskie”) prava cheloveka v konstitutsionnom i filosofsko-pravovom izmerenii: k postanovke problemy [Personality (“somatic”) human rights in the constitutional and philosophical-legal dimension: the formulation of the problem]. Gosudarstvo i pravo [State and Law], 2000, no. 10, pp. 43–50. (In Russian)

Lampe E.-J. The position of Anthropology of Law Within the Basic Legal Sciences. Law, Life and the Images of Man: Modes of Thought in Modern Legal Theory. Festschrift for Jan M. Broekman. Еd. by F. Fleerackers, E. van Leeuwen, and B. van Roermund, Berlin, 1996, 621 p.

Lepetuhin N.V. Teorii rasizma v obshchestvenno-politicheskoi zhizni Zapadnoi Evropy vtoroi poloviny XIX–nachala XX vekov: Zh.-A. Gobino, G. Lebon, Kh.-S. Chemberlen [Theories of racism in the socio-political life of Western Europe in the second half of the XIX-early XX centuries: J.-A.Gobineau, G.Lebon, H.-S.Chamberlain] (PhD Thesis). Ivanovo, Ivanovo State University, 2001. 18 p. (In Russian)

Lepskij V. E. Refleksivno-aktivnye sredy innovatsionnogo razvitiia [Reflexively active mediums of innovation development]. Moscow, 2010. 255 p. (In Russian)

Lepti B. [Society as a whole. On three forms of analysis of social integrity]. Odissei. Chelovek v istorii [Odysseus. Man in history]. Ed. by A.Ja.Gurevich. Moscow, 1966, pp. 149–165. (In Russian)

Lombrozo Ch. Prestupnyi chelovek [The Criminal Person]. Transl. from Italian. Moscow, 2005. 876 p. (In Russian)

Maksimov S. [The subject and methodological ambushes of the legal anthropology]. Materialy Pershogho vseukrajinsjkogho krughlogho stolu “Antropologhija prava: filosofsjkyj ta jurydychnyj vymiry (stan, problemy, perspektyvy)” [The Material of the First All-Ukrainian Round Table “Anthropology of law: the philosophical and juridical measurements (state, problems, perspective)”]. Lviv, 2006, pp. 240–249. (In Ukrainian)

Maksimov S. Antropologicheskie osnovy prava [Anthropological foundations of law]. Ezhegodnik ukrainskogo prava [Yearbook of Ukrainian law], 2014, no. 6, pp. 95–104. (In Russian)

Maksimov S. Do py`tannya pro zasady` prava: sproba sy`stematy`zaciyi [On the fundamentals right: an attempt to systematize]. Pravo Ukrayiny` [Right of Ukraine], 2011, no. 8, pp. 38–45. (In Ukrainian)

Maksimov S. Klassicheskaia i neklassicheskaia modeli osmysleniia pravovoi real’nosti v kontekste kommunikativnoi paradigmy prava [Classical and non-classical models of comprehension of legal reality in the context of the communicative paradigm of law]. Pravovedenie, 2014, No 4, pp. 71–97. (In Russian)

Maksimov S. Pravovaia real’nost’: opyt filosofskogo osmysleniia: monografiia [Legal reality: the experience of philosophical reflection]. Kharkiv, 2002. 327 p. (In Russian)

Malinovskij B. Nauchnaia teoriia kul’tury [The Scientific Theory of Culture]. Moscow, 2005. 184 p. (In Russian)

Martyshin O.V. Ob osobennostiakh filosofsko-pravovoi metodologii [About the peculiarities of philosophical-legal methodology]. Gosudarstvo i pravo [State and Law], 2016, no. 6, pp. 20–30. (In Russian)

Morgan L.G. Drevnee obshchestvo: issledovanie linii chelovecheskogo progressa ot dikosti cherez varvarstvo k tsivilizatsii [Ancient society]. Transl. from English by M. O. Kosven. Moscow, 2016. 344 p. (In Russian)

Naumov A. V. Rossiiskoe ugolovnoe parvo: kurs lektsii: v 2 t. T. 1. Obshchaia chast’ [Russian criminal law in 2 vols. Vol. 1. General part]. Moscow, 2004. 494 p. (In Russian)

Nesterova E.M. Lichnostnye (somaticheskie) prava v sisteme prav cheloveka [Personality (somatic) rights in the system of human rights] (PhD Thesis). Moscow, Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation, 2014. 25 p. (In Russian)

Nicshe F. Volia k vlasti. Opyt pereotsenki vsekh tsennostei [Will to power. Experience reassessing all values]. Transl. from German by E.Gercyk. Moscow, 2005. 880 p. (In Russian)

Obuhov V.L. K voprosu o meste filosofskoi antropologii v sisteme antropologicheskogo znaniia [On the question of the place of philosophical anthropology in the system of anthropological knowledge]. Vestnik Leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta imeni A. S. Pushkina [Bulletin of the Leningrad State University. A. S. Pushkin], 2014, no. 4, vol. 2, pp. 75–83. (In Russian)

Pavlov V. I. K voprosu ob antropologicheskom tipe pravoponimaniia [To the question of the anthropological type of legal understanding]. Pravovedenie, 2015, no. 4, pp. 71–97. (In Russian)

Pavlov V.I. Osobennosti formirovaniia vizantiiskoi pravovoi sistemy i vizantiiskogo kanonicheskogo prava v kontekste problemy opredeleniia putei retseptsii rimskogo prava na Rusi [Features of the formation of the Byzantine legal system and Byzantine canon law in the context of the problem of determining the ways of reception of Roman law in Rus]. Pravo v sovremennom belorusskom obshchestve [Law in the modern Belarusian society]. Minsk, 2016, i. 11, pp. 62–71. (In Russian)

Pavlov V.I. Sinergiinaia antropologiia i postklassicheskaia antropologiia prava: k voprosu ob antropologicheskom podkhode k ponimaniiu prava [Synergetic anthropology and postclassical anthropology of law: to the question of the anthropological approach to understanding the law]. Fonar’ Diogena. Mezhdunarodnyi antropologicheskii zhurnal (Moskva–Kazan’, Rossiiskaia Federaciia) [Lantern of Diogenes. International anthropological journal (Moscow–Kazan, Russia)], 2015, no. 1, pp. 211–239. (In Russian)

Pershic A.I. Etnologiia prava [The ethnology of law]. Vestnik Rossiiskoi Akademii nauk [Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences], 1997, vol. 67, no. 9, pp. 792–807. (In Russian)

Petrazhickij L.I. Vvedenie v izuchenie prava i nravstvennosti: emotsional’naia psikhologiia [Introduction to the study of law and morality: emotional psychology]. Moscow, 2010. 311 p. (In Russian)

Piliugina N. S. Antropologicheskii metod poznaniia prava: teoretiko-pravovoi analiz [Anthropological method of cognition of law: theoretical and legal analysis] (PhD Thesis). Krasnodar, Kuban State University, 2009. 25 p. (In Russian)

Puchkov O. A. Teoretiko-pravovye osnovaniia iuridicheskoi antropologii [Theoretical and legal bases of legal anthropology] (PhD Thesis). Ekaterinburg, The Ural State Law Academy, 2010. 39 p. (In Russian)

Ratzinger J. (Benedict XVI). Tsennosti v epokhu peremen. O sootvetstvii vyzovam vremeni [Values in an era of change. Conformity with the challenges of time]. Moscow, 2007. 163 p. (In Russian)

Redkliff-Braun A. R. Metod v sotsial’noi antropologii [Method in Social Anthropology]. Moscow, 2001. 416 p. (In Russian)

Rozenberg A. Mif XX veka. Otsenka dukhovno-intellektual’noi bor’by figur nashego vremeni [Myth of the XX century. Evaluation of the spiritual and intellectual struggle of the fi gur of our time]. Tallinn, 1998. 514 p. (In Russian)

Rulan N. Iuridicheskaia antropologiia [Legal anthropology]. Transl. from French. Moscow, 1999. 301 p. (In Russian)

Saidov A. [Methodological problems of anthropology of law]. Antropologіia prava: fіlosofs’kii ta iuridichnii vimіri (stan, problemi, perspektivi): stattі uchasnikіv IX Mіzhnarodnogo kruglogo stolu, m. L’vіv, 6–7 grudnia 2013 r. [Articles IX International Roundtable: Anthropology rights: philosophical and legal dimensions (status, problems and prospects)]. Lviv, 2014, pp. 247–259. (In Russian)

Sarkisjanc M. Angliiskie korni nemetskogo fashizma: ot britanskoi k avstro-bavarskoi “rase gospod”: kurs lektsii, prochitannyi v Geidel’bergskom universitete [English roots of German fascism: from the British to the Austro-ro-Bavarian “race of gentlemen”]. Transl. from German by M. Yu. Nekrasov. St. Petersburg, 2003. 398 p. (In Russian)

Shanin T. Sotsial’naia rabota kak kul’turnyi fenomen sovremennosti [Social Work as a Cultural Phenomenon of Modernity]. Voprosy filosofii [Questions of Philosophy], 1997, no. 11, pp. 55–69. (In Russian)

Sheler M. Izbrannye proizvedeniia [Selected Works]. Transl. from German; ed. by A. V. Denezhkin. Moscow, 1994. 413 p. (In Russian)

Shienok V.P. Ocherki gumanisticheskoi metodologii natsional’noi iurisprudentsii: monografiia [Essays on the Humanistic Methodology of National Jurisprudence]. Minsk, 2017. 238 p. (In Russian)

Smihula D. Istoricheskoe razvitie antropologii prava [Historical development of anthropology of law]. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta imeni N.I.Lobachevskogo [Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod University named after N. I. Lobachevsky], 2014, pp. 150– 155. (In Russian)

Sorokin V.V. Pravo i pravoslavie [Law and Orthodoxy]. Barnaul, 2007. 548 p. (In Russian)

Sotsiokul’turnaia antropologiia prava [Socio-cultural anthropology of law]. Ed. by N. A. Isaev, I. L. Chestnov. St. Petersburg, 2015. 837 p. (In Russian)

Stepin V. S. Teoreticheskoe znanie [Theoretical knowledge]. Moscow, 1999. 480 p. (In Russian)

Syryh V.M. Rossiiskie pravovedy na pereput’e: materialisticheskii ratsionalizm ili sub”ektivnyi idealizm [Russian jurists at the crossroads: materialistic rationalism or subjective idealism]. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava [Journal of Russian Law], 2016, no. 1, pp. 75–89. (In Russian)

Teorema Gedelia o nepolnote [Gödel’s incompleteness theorem]. Elementy bol’shoi nauki [Elements of large science]. Available at: http://elementy.ru/trefil/21142 (accessed: 10.11.2016). (In Russian)

Tereshkovich P.V. [Anthropology]. Noveishii filosofskii slovar’ [The Newest Philosophical Dictionary]. Ed. by A. A. Gricanov. Minsk, 1999, pp. 51–52. (In Russian)

Timoshina E. V. [Classical and postclassical legal understanding as styles of philosophical and legal thinking]. Postklassicheskaia ontologiia prava: monografiia [Postclassical ontology of law]. Ed. by I. L. Chestnov. St. Petersburg, Aletejja Publ., 2016, pp. 218–294. (In Russian)

Udovy`ka L. [Trends in legal anthropology]. Materialy Chetvertogo vseukrajinsjkogho krughlogho stolu “Antropologhija prava: filosofsjkyj ta jurydychnyj vymiry (stan, problemy, perspektyvy)” [The Material of the Fourth All-Ukrainian Round Table “Anthropology of law: the philosophical and juridical measurements (state, problems, perspective)”]. Lviv, 2008, pp. 301–323. (In Ukrainian)

Vasilevich D.G. Poniatie i vidy somaticheskikh (lichnostnykh) prav [The concept and types of somatic (personal) rights]. Pravo i demokratiia [Law and Democracy]. 2014, no. 25, pp. 132–143. (In Russian)

Vershok I. L. [Anthropological approach in the study of consciousness and sense of justice]. Antropologіia prava: fіlosofs’kii ta iuridichnii vimіri (stan, problemi, perspektivi): stattі uchasnikіv Mіzhnarodnogo “kruglogo stolu”, m. L’vіv, 9–10 grudnia 2011 r. [Articles of the International Roundtable “Anthropology of Law: philosophical and legal dimensions (status, problems and prospects)”]. Lviv, 2011, pp. 52–62. (In Russian)

Vershok I.L. Ekologicheskoe pravosoznanie v doktrine pravovogo soznaniia [Ecological sense of justice in the doctrine of sense of justice]. Minsk, 2006. 132 p. (In Russian)

Veyne P.-M. Comment on écrit l’histoire: essai d’épistémologie. Le Seuil, 1970. 349 p.

Vydrina O. V. Antropologicheskie aspekty prava v situacii sovremennogo kul’turnogo krizisa [Anthropological aspects of law in the situation of the current cultural crisis]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of Tomsk State University]. 2010, no. 1, pp. 68–70. (In Russian)