Правовое мышление как интеллектуальная составляющая юридического познания

Yuri P.  Borulenkov

Authors

Yuri P. Borulenkov St. Petersburg Academy of the Russian Investigative Committee

Abstract

The author of the article focuses on the legal thinking which is a core of an intellectual component of the legal knowledge and represents certain spiritual and practical, as well as informative and evaluative intellectual operations connected with the existence of problem situations which are aimed at setting certain tasks and solving problems in the legal sphere. The interconnected comprehension of content (values) and identification of the sense of the matter under consideration constitute the main mechanisms of understanding as a result and one of the processes of thinking. At their intersection new images and verbally meaning forms are generated. The meaning generation is based on different and contradictory contexts manifested in the people’s lives. Goal formation is a key aspect of formation and development of sense in the individual activities. The legal thinking should be considered as a complicated comprehensive poly-structure which is based on certain forms and ways of the legal logic, the legal language and the world outlook bases and which consists of several horizontal formations and vertical levels determined by the objective logic of achieving intermediate and ultimate goals, by the unified and individual, theoretical and practical, professional and nonprofessional factors. The author notes that the ordinary, scientific and theoretical, as well as professional types of the legal thinking schematically represent essentially the same mental process of interpretation and construction of the legal reality. At the same time, the interrelation between the theoretical and practical approaches, as well as a professional component to highlight some of their significant features at the supraindividual level. It is emphasized that the daily individual legal thinking not only underlies other types of the legal thinking. Within the consciousness of a scientist or a law enforcement officer a “lawyer” does not replace a “common citizen”, they coexist. The thinking of a legal practitioner constitutes a complex dynamic system of the ordinary and professional types of thinking which are parallel and which at the same time exert mutual impact. Their interrelation depends on the extent of immersion into the legal matter and the legal environment.

Keywords:

legal knowledge, methodology of the legal knowledge, technology of the legal knowledge, legal thinking

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Yuri P. Borulenkov, St. Petersburg Academy of the Russian Investigative Committee

candidate of legal sciences, associate professor, vice-principal

References

Abakumova I.V. Bazovye poniatiia klassicheskoi didaktiki v kontekste teorii smysla [The main concepts of classic didactics in the context of theory of sense]. Announcer ОGU, 2002, no. 8, pp. 14–18. (In Russian)

Agafonov A.Yu. Chelovek kak smyslovaia model’ mira. Prolegomeny k psikho- logicheskoi teorii smysla [Human as semantic model of the world. Preliminary remarks to the psychological theory of sense]. Samara, Bakhrakh-M Publ., 2000. 336 p. (In Russian)

Alefirenko N.F. Lingvokul’turologiia. Tsennostno-smyslovoe prostranstvo iazyka: ucheb. posobie [Cultural linguistics. Value-language semantic space: Textbook]. Moscow, Flinta, Nauka Publ., 2010. 288 p. (In Russian)

Aleksandrov A. S. Vvedenie v sudebnuiu lingvistiku [Introduction to judicial linguistics]. Nizhny Novgorod, Nizhny Novgorod Law Academy, 2003. 420 p. (In Russian)

Alekseev P. V., Panin A. V. Filosofiia: uchebnik [Philosophy: Textbook]. Moscow, MGU Publ., 2005. 608 p. (In Russian)

Artishevskaya T.M. Psikhologiia massovykh kommunikatsii: ucheb. posobie: v 2 ch. [Psychology of Mass Communication: Textbook: in 2 parts]. Part 1. Chelyabinsk, Cheliab. gos. un-t Publ., 2010. 198 p. (In Russian)

Avakian T.V. Iuridicheskoe myshlenie v pravoprimenitel’nom protsesse. Avtoref. dis. kand. iurid. nauk [The legal thinking is in a law applying process. Synopsis dissertation of the candidate of legal sciences]. Rostov on Don, 2006. 18 р. (In Russian)

Babayeva Yu.D., Berezanskaya N.B., Vasiliev I.A., Voiskunsky A.E., Kornilova T.V. Smysloobrazovanie kak osnovnoi protsess integratsii novoobrazovanii v myshlenii / Smyslovaia teoriia myshleniia [Sense making as a primary process of integration in thinking. Semantic theory of thinking]. Bulletin of Moscow University. Science Magazine. Series 14. Psychology, 2008, no. 2, pp. 39–43. (In Russian)

Bachinin V.A., Salnikov V.P. Filosofiia prava. Kratkii slovar’. (Ser. «Mir kul’tury, istorii i filosofii») [Philosophy of Law. Concise Dictionary]. St. Petersburg, Lan’, 2000. 400 p. (In Russian)

Baev O.Ya. O pravovoi korrektnosti argumentov v nauchnykh diskussiiakh poslednego vremeni [Replica. On the legal correctness of the arguments in scientific discussions recent years]. Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyi zhurnal [Criminologist’s Library. Science Magazine], 2015, no. 6, pp. 20–23. (In Russian)

Bakhtin M.M. [Author and main character in aesthetic activity]. Avtor i geroi: K filosofskim osnovam gumanitarnykh nauk [Author and main character: the philosophical foundations of the humanities]. St. Petersburg, Azbuka Publ., 2000. 337 p. (In Russian)

Bakhtin M. M. K filosofii postupka. Filosofiia i sotsiologiia nauki i tekhniki: Ezhegodnik. 1984–1985 [To the philosophy of act. Philosophy and sociology of science and technology: Yearbook. 1984–1985]. Moscow, Science Publ., 1986. 252 p. (In Russian)

Baranov P.P., Kurbatov V.I. Logika dlia iuristov [Logic for lawyers]. Rostov on Don, RIuI MVD Rossii, 2003. 620 p. (In Russian)

Bezlepkin N.I. Filosofiia iazyka v Rossii: K istorii russkoi lingvofilosofii [Philosophy of Language in Russia: On the history of Russian linguistics philosophy]. St. Petersburg, «Art» Publ., 2002. 272 p. (In Russian)

Borulenkov Yu. P. [The structure of legal knowledge: general-theoretical aspect / role of the Russian Federal Penitentiary Service of educational institutions in ensuring the effective functioning of the penal system]. Rol’ obrazovatel’nykh uchrezhdenii FSIN Rossii v obespechenii effektivnogo funktsionirovaniia UIS: materialy mezhdunarod. nauch.-prakt. konf., posviashchennoi 65-letiiu VIuI FSIN Rossii [Proceedings of the international scientific- practical conference dedicated to the 65-th anniversary of VYUI FSIN Russia]. Vladimir, 2009. P.152–160. (In Russian)

Borulenkov Yu.P. [Topical issues of the construction technologies of applied legal knowledge]. Nauchnye trudy. Rossiiskaia akademiia iuridicheskikh nauk [Publications. Russian Academy of Legal Sciences]. T. 1. Moscow, Lawyer Publ., 2016, pp. 40–45. (In Russian)

Borulenkov Yu.P. [Truth in adversarial legal understanding]. Teoriia ugolovnogo protsessa: sostiazatel’nost’: monografiia [Theory of the criminal process: competitiveness: a monograph]. Ed. N. A. Kolokolova. Part 2. Moscow, Iurlitinform Publ., 2013, pp. 202–227. (In Russian)

Borulenkov Yu. P. Intuitsiia kak spetsificheskii fenomen iuridicheskogo poznaniia [Intuition as a specific phenomenon of the legal understanding]. Rossiiskii sledovatel’ [Russian investigator], 2014, no. 23, pp. 3–8. (In Russian)

Borulenkov Yu.P. Iuridicheskii fakt kak obraz obstoiatel’stva real’noi deistvitel’nosti [Legal fact as the image of the circumstances of reality]. Business in law. International Journal of Economics and Law, 2013, no. 1, pp. 122–127. (In Russian)

Borulenkov Yu.P. Iuridicheskoe poznanie (nekotorye metodologicheskie, teoreticheskie i prakseologicheskie aspekty): monografiia [Legal understanding (some methodological, theoretical and Praxeological aspects): Monograph]. Ed. by V.N.Kartashov. Moscow, Iurlitinform Publ., 2014. 392 p. (In Russian)

Borulenkov Yu. P. Iuridicheskoe poznanie i razdvoenie individual’nogo soznaniia iurista [Legal understanding and lawyers’ split individual consciousness]. Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyi zhurnal [Library criminologist. Science Magazine], 2014, no.4, pp.366–376. (In Russian)

Borulenkov Yu.P. Iuridicheskoe poznanie, dokazatel’stvo i dokazyvanie (metodologiia, teoriia, praktika): monografiia [Legal knowledge, evidence and proof (methodology, theory, practice): Monograph]. Scientific. Ed. prof. V.N.Kartashov. Moscow, Iurlitinform Publ., 2016. 536 p. (In Russian)

Borulenkov Yu.P. Kompetentnost’ sub”ekta iuridicheskogo poznaniia [The competence of the subject of legal knowledge]. Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyi zhurnal [Criminologist’s library. Science Magazine], 2015, no. 1, pp. 322–330. (In Russian)

Borulenkov Yu.P. Metodologicheskii status germenevtiki v iuridicheskom poznanii [Methodological status of hermeneutics in legal knowledge]. Iuridicheskaia nauka: istoriia i sovremennost’ [Legal Science: history and modernity], 2015, no. 7, pp. 189–199. (In Russian)

Borulenkov Yu.P. Metodologiia iuridicheskogo poznaniia: deiatel’nostnyi podkhod [Methodology of legal understanding: the activity approach]. Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyi zhurnal [Criminologist’s Library. Science Magazine], 2015, no.6, pp.323–332. (In Russian)

Borulenkov Yu.P. Metodologiia iuridicheskogo poznaniia: lingvisticheskii podkhod [Methodology of legal understanding: linguistic approach]. Iuridicheskaia nauka: istoriia i sovremennost’ [Legal Science: history and modernity], 2013, no.10, pp.206–216. (In Russian)

Borulenkov Yu.P. Metodologiia iuridicheskogo poznaniia: logicheskii podkhod [Methodology of legal understanding: logical approach]. Bulletin of the Academy of the Investigative Committee of Russian Federation, 2015, no. 4, pp. 42–50. (In Russian)

Borulenkov Yu. P. Tekhnologii iuridicheskogo poznaniia: poniatie i soderzhanie [Technology of Legal knowledge: the concept and content]. LEX RUSSICA. Proceedings of Moscow State Law Academy, 2015, no. 7, pp. 7–20. (In Russian)

Bryanskaia E. V. Argumentiruiushchaia sila dokazatel’stv pri rassmotrenii ugolovnykh del v sude pervoi instantsii: monografiia [Argue the strength of evidence in criminal proceedings in the court of first instance: a monograph]. Irkutsk, IGU Publ., 2015. 193 p. (In Russian)

Bryushinkin V.N. [Critical thinking and reasoning]. Kriticheskoe myshlenie, logika, argumentatsiia: sb. st. [Critical thinking, logic, reasoning: Sat. Art]. Eds. V. N. Bryushinkina, V. I. Markin. Kaliningrad, Kaliningr. gos. un-t Publ., 2003, pp. 29–35. (In Russian)

Davydova M. L. Professional’noe myshlenie iuristov v sravnitel’no-pravovom rakurse [Professional Thinking of lawyers in comparative legal perspective]. Vestnik Universiteta im. O. E. Kutafina [Bulletin of the University of them. O. E. Kutafina], 2015, no. 5, pp. 66–72. (In Russian)

Dmitrieva L. A. [Cognitive styles as a factor in establishing the truth in a criminal case]. Ugolovnyi protsess: ot proshlogo k budushchemu: materialy Mezhdunarod. nauch.-prakt. konf. (Moskva, 21 marta 2014 g.) [Criminal procedure: from the past to the future: materials of the International scientific-practical conference (Moscow, 21 March 2014)]. At 2 parts, Part 2. Moscow, 2014, pp. 55–58. (In Russian)

Egorov V.A. Genezis iuridicheskogo myshleniia [The genesis of the legal thinking]. Available at: http://www.konspekt.biz/index.php?text=53592 (accessed: 07.12.2016). (In Russian)

Glukhareva L. I. Dogma prava i dogmatichnost’ iuridicheskogo myshleniia [Law Dogma and legal dogmatic thinking]. Vestnik RGGU. Nauchnyi zhurnal [Journal of Russian State Humanitarian University. Science Magazine], 2013, no. 19, pp. 19–26. (In Russian)

Gradirovsky S. N. Vosstanovlenie osnovanii dogmaticheskogo myshleniia kak uslovie formirovaniia myshleniia [Recovering bases of dogmatic thinking as a condition of formation of thinking]. Available at: http://www.archipelag.ru/agenda/gospel_povestka/konferens_r_vs_r_2012/text12/ (accessed: 07.19.2016). (In Russian)

Gredeskul N.A. K ucheniiu ob osushchestvlenii prava. Intellektual’nyi protsess, tre- buiushchiisia dlia osushchestvleniia prava [The implementation of teaching law. Intellectual process required for the exercise of Law]. Kharkov, typography Adolf Darre, 1900. 245 p. (In Russian)

Gubaeva T. V. Iazyk i pravo. Iskusstvo vladeniia slovom v professional’noi iuridicheskoi deiatel’nosti [Language and Law. The art of word in a professional legal process]. Moscow, Norma Publ., 2003. 160 p. (In Russian)

Gulyaikhin V.N. Genezis teorii pravovoi sotsializatsii [Genesis of legal socialization theory]. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava [Magazine of the Russian right], 2013, no. 5, pp. 48–56. (In Russian)

Hramtsova N.G. Pravovoe myshlenie i iazyk prava — ob”ektivnye osnovaniia pravovogo diskursa [Legal thinking and Law language — the objective of the legal discourse base]. Probely v rossiiskom zakonodatel’stve [Gaps in Russian legislation], 2009, no.1, pp. 54–58. (In Russian)

Iering R. Iuridicheskaia tekhnika [Legal Technology]. Compiler A. V. Polyakov. Moscow, Statute Publ., 2008. 231 p. (In Russian)

Izyurov N. Advokaty: Odnopolchane i edinomyshlenniki [Lawyers: Brother-soldiers and associates]. Available at: http://www.iuaj.net/node/2034 (accessed: 06.27.2016). (In Russian)

Kachalov O.V. Vidy uskorennogo proizvodstva v rossiiskom ugolovnom protsesse [Types of accelerated production in the Russian criminal trial]. Moscow, Iurlitinform, 2016. 248 p. (In Russian)

Kalinowski K.B. Vyemka do vozbuzhdeniia ugolovnogo dela narushaet konstitutsionnyi printsip sorazmernosti ogranicheniia prav grazhdan [The recess before criminal proceedings violates the constitutional principle of proportionality limitation of citizens’ rights]. Ugolovnyi protsess [Criminal Procedure], 2016, no. 3, pp. 44–51. (In Russian)

Korkunoff N.M. Lektsii po obshchei teorii prava [Lectures on the general theory of law]. Comp., author of introd. art., comments. A. N. Medushevsky. Moscow, Russian Political Encyclopedia Publ., 2010. 520 p. (In Russian)

Kornienko A.F. Sushchnost’ protsessov myshleniia i myslitel’noi deiatel’nosti [The essence of the processes of thought and mental activity]. Nauchnyi dialog [Scientific dialogue], 2013, no. 4: Psychology. Pedagogy, pp. 49–62. (In Russian)

Lazarev V. V. Sotsial’no-psikhologicheskie aspekty primeneniia prava [Socio-psychological aspects of the application of the law]. Kazan, Publishing House of Kazan. University, 1982. 144 p. (In Russian)

Leger R. Velikie pravovye sistemy sovremennosti: sravnitel’no-pravovoi podkhod [Great legal systems of modernity: a comparative legal approach]. Moscow, Wolters Kluwer Publ., 2009. 584 p. (In Russian)

Lektorsky V.A. Epistemologiia klassicheskaia i neklassicheskaia [Epistemology classical and nonclassical]. Moscow, Editorial URSS, 2001. 256 p. (In Russian)

Leontiev A. N. Deiatel’nost’. Soznanie. Lichnost’ [Activities. Consciousness. Personality]. Moscow, Meaning, Academy Publ., 2005. 352 с. (In Russian)

Leontiev D.A. Smysloobrazovanie i ego konteksty: zhizn’, struktura, kul’tura, opyt [Sense making and its contexts: life, structure, culture, experience]. Mir psikhologii. Nauchno-metodicheskii zhurnal [World of Psychology. Scientific-methodical journal], 2014, no. 1, pp. 104–117. (In Russian)

Mikhailov A.M. Iuridicheskaia dogmatika i iuridicheskoe myshlenie (razmyshleniia) [Legal dogmatics and legal thinking (thinking)]. Available at: http://blog.pravo.ru/blog/theory/1588.html (accessed: 07.10.2016).

Mordovtsev A. Yu. Iuridicheskoe myshlenie v kontekste sravnitel’nogo pravovedeniia: kul’tur-antropologicheskie problemy [Legal thinking in the context of comparative law: cultural anthropology]. Pravovedenie, 2003, no. 2, pp. 38–48. (In Russian)

Ovchinnikov A.I. Pravovoe myshlenie v germenevticheskoi paradigme [The legal thinking in the hermeneutic paradigm]. Scientific. ed. by P. P. Baranov. Rostov n/D, Rostov State Univ. Publ, 2002. 285 p. (In Russian)

Ovchinnikov A.I. Pravovoe myshlenie: teoretiko-metodologicheskii analiz [Legal Thinking: theoretical and methodological analysis]. Dir. ed. by P.P.Baranov. Rostov n/D, Rostov State Univ. Publ., 2003. 344 p. (In Russian)

Perelman H., Albrecht-Tyteka L. [Language and modeling of social interaction]. Novaia ritorika: traktat po argumentatsii: perevody [The new rhetoric: a treatise on argumentation: Translations]. Comp. V.M.Sergeyev and P.B.Parshin, tot. ed. by V.V.Petrova. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1987, pp. 207–264. (In Russian)

Polyakov A.V. [The phenomenological theory of law N.N.Alekseev]. Rossiiskii pravovoi diskurs i ideia kommunikatsii: ucheb. posobie [Russian legal discourse and the idea of communication. Tutorial]. St. Petersburg, 2006, 60 p. (In Russian)

Przhilensky V.I. Iuridicheskoe poznanie i pravoprimenitel’nye praktiki v kontekste neklassicheskoi epistemologii [Legal knowledge and practice in the context of non-classical epistemology]. Problems of Philosophy, 2015, no. 8, pp. 42–52. (In Russian)

Przhilensky V. I. Real’nost’ i istina v konstruktivistskoi paradigme filosofii prava [Reality and truth in the constructivist paradigm of the philosophy of law]. LEX RUSSICA. Proceedings of Moscow State Law Academy, 2015, no. 5, pp. 23–43. (In Russian)

Psikhologicheskii mekhanizm iuridicheskogo povedeniia lichnosti [The psychological mechanism of the legal behavior of the person]. Under scientific. ed. V. N. Kartashov. Yaroslavl, Yaroslavl State University Publ., 2011. 184 p. (In Russian)

Ricoeur P. Germenevtika i metod sotsial’nykh nauk [Hermeneutics and the method of the social sciences]. Available at: http://www.philosophy.ru/library/ricoeur/social.html (accessed: 26.09.2014).

Rozin V.M. Genezis i sovremennye problemy prava. Metodologicheskii i kul’turologicheskii analiz [Genesis and modern Law issues. Methodological and cultural analysis. Moscow, NOTA BENE Publ., 2001. 336 p. (In Russian)

Ruzavin G.I. Metodologiia nauchnogo poznaniia: ucheb. posobie dlia vuzov [The methodology of scientific knowledge: Textbook. manual for schools]. Moscow, UNITY-DANA Publ., 2013. 287 p. (In Russian)

Schedrovitsky G. P. [Reflection in the activities]. Doklad na sovmestnykh zasedaniiakh sistemno-strukturnogo seminara i seminara po issledovaniiu refleksivnykh protsessov (5 i 12 ianvaria 1972 g.) [Report at the joint meetings of the systematic structural seminar and workshop on the study of reflexive processes (5 and 12 January 1972)]. Available at: https://docviewer.yandex.ru/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fbdn-steiner.ru%2Fmodules%2FBooks%2Ffiles%2FGP_3.doc&name=GP_3.doc&lang=u&c=5719b78c14a2 (accessed: 04.22.2016). (In Russian)

Schedrovitsky G. P. Myshlenie. Ponimanie. Refleksiia [Thinking. Understanding. Reflection]. Moscow, CMI Legacy Publ., 2005. 798 p. (In Russian)

Schutz A. Struktura povsednevnogo myshleniia [Structure of everyday thinking]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia [Sociological studies], 1988, no. 2. Available at: http://www.countries.ru/library/texts/shutz.htm (accessed: 04.20.2016).

Sigalov K.E. Metodologicheskie printsipy poznaniia sredy prava: (kak pravovoi kategorii i filosofsko-pravovogo fenomena) [Methodological principles of learning Law environment (as a legal category and philosophical and legal phenomenon)]. Istoriia gosudarstva i prava [History of State and Law], 2010, no. 4, pp. 13–16. (In Russian)

Skurko E. V. [Epistemology of Law: Theory and Practice]. Nauchnye trudy. Rossiiskaia akademiia iuridicheskikh nauk [Proceedings. Russian Academy of Legal Sciences]. T.1. Moscow, Lawyer Publ., 2011, pp. 511–517. (In Russian)

Spirkin A. G. Filosofiia [Philosophy]. Moscow, Gardariki Publ., 2002. 736 p. (In Russian)

Tarasov N.N. Metodologicheskie problemy iuridicheskoi nauki. Monografiia [Methodological problems of legal science. Monograph]. Ekaterinburg, Publishing House of the University of the Humanities, 2001. 264 p. (In Russian)

Terekhin V. V. Dopustimost’ dokazatel’stv v ugolovnom protsesse (metodologicheskii, pravovoi, eticheskii aspekty). Avtoref. dis. doct. iurid. nauk [Admissibility of evidence in criminal proceedings (methodological, legal and ethical aspects): Synopsis dissertation of the candidate of legal sciences]. Nizhni Novgorod, 2016. 54 p. (In Russian)

Tsvetkov Yu.A. Kakim byt’ rossiiskomu sledovateliu ili chem iurist otlichaetsia ot zakonnika? (Replika na repliku professora O. Ya. Baeva) [How to be a Russian investigator or what’s the difference between a lawyer and law applying person? (Replica replica of the professor Baev O.Ya.)]. Rossiiskii sledovatel’ [Russian investigator], 2016, no.11, pp.26–30. (In Russian)

Vidy i protsessy myshleniia. Razvitie myshleniia v personogeneze [Types and thinking processes. The development of thinking in personogenesis]. Available at: https://pro-psixology.ru/kognitivnoe-razvitie-psixologiya-poznavatelnyx/46-vidy-i-processy-myshleniya-razvitie-myshleniya-v.html (accessed: 10.26.2016). (In Russian)

Voishvillo E.K. Poniatie kak forma myshleniia: logiko-gnoseologicheskii analiz [Understanding as a form of thinking: logical-epistemological analysis]. Moscow, Moscow State University Publ., 1989. 239 p. (In Russian)

Vvedenie v filosofiiu: ucheb. posobie dlia vuzov [Introduction to Philosophy: Textbook. manual for Universities]. Authors I. T. Frolov and others. Moscow, The Republic Publ., 2003. 623 p. (In Russian)

Weiss Bernard J. Dukh musul’manskogo prava [The spirit of Islamic law]. Transl. S. S. Raimov. Moscow, St. Petersburg, Dilia Publ., 2008. 320 p. (In Russian)

Yarkova E. N. Istoriia i metodologiia iuridicheskoi nauki: ucheb. posobie [History and methodology of jurisprudence: a tutorial]. Tyumen, Publishing Tyumen State University, 2012. 348 p. (In Russian)

Yarmanova Yu.B. Zakonomernosti smysloobrazovaniia v protsesse ponimaniia [The regularities of meaning in the process of understanding]. Molodoi uchenyi [Young scientist]. 2015, no. 6, pp. 726–729. (In Russian)

Yasyukova L. Razryv mezhdu umnymi i glupymi narastaet [Gap between smart and stupid is growing]. Available at: http://materinstvo.ru/art/razryv-mejdu-umnymi-i-glupymi-narastaet (accessed: 06.17.2016). (In Russian)

Zakhartsev S. I., Salnikov V. P. Zavisimost’ zhiznedeiatel’nosti ot iuristov kak filosofskaia i filosofsko-pravovaia problema [The dependence of living on lawyers as a philosophical and philosophical-legal problem]. Iuridicheskaia nauka: istoriia i sovremennost’. Federal’nyi nauchno-prakticheskii zhurnal [Legal Science: history and modernity. Federal Scientific and practical journal], 2016, no. 9, pp. 125–129. (In Russian)

Zhalinsky A. E. Vvedenie v spetsial’nost’ «Iurisprudentsiia» [Introduction to the major «Jurisprudence»]. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2009. 362 p. (In Russian)

Znakov V.V. Ponimanie kak problema psikhologii myshleniia [Understanding as a problem of the psychology of thinking]. Voprosy psikhologii [Questions of psychology]. Available at: http://www.bim-bad.ru/biblioteka/article_full.php?aid=813&binn_rubrik_pl_articles=121 (accessed: 07/07/2016). (In Russian)

Zykov D.V. Nekotorye voprosy teorii iuridicheskogo myshleniia [Some questions of the theory of legal thinking]. Vestnik VolGU. Ser. 5: Iurisprudentsiia [Bulletin of Volgograd State University, Ser. 5: Law], 2012, no. 2, pp. 274–281. (In Russian)

Zykov D. V. O trekh vidakh iuridicheskogo myshleniia [The three types of legal thinking]. Bulletin of Volgograd State University, Ser. 5: Law, 2013, no. 2, pp. 82–85. (In Russian)