Spam jurisprudence, air law, and the rank anxiety of nothing happening

Authors

  • Pierre Schlag University of Colorado
  • Ekaterina G. Samokhina Department of theory and history of law and state, faculty of Law, HSE St. Petersburg

Abstract

The article critically analyzes the current state of American legal science. At the beginning of his discussions the author describes the scene from the movie “The Endless Summer” (1966). It was this scene that became the starting point for further author’s discussions on modern American legal science. It was a movie about two surfers who traveled the world in search of the perfect wave. As they arrived on the scene of yet another dispiritingly becalmed ocean, every time the locals sais, “You missed it. You should’ve been here yesterday”. From the author’s point of view this pretty well describes the state of contemporary legal scholarship: It’s almost totally becalmed. Worry about ratings has become the prevailing epistemological principle in US law faculties at the beginning of the 21st century. It was at this point that deep uncertainty about the goals and objectives of higher education (together with its intensive transformation into a corporation) led to widely publicized attempts to measure individual and institutional contributions to the legal science by referring to various rating schemes. Everyone condemned the ratings and everyone followed them. The author concludes that “spam jurisprudence” and anxiety about ratings are interrelated phenomena. Between them there is a feedback effect. Asked by the question “can the things be different?”, the author analyzes various aspects of modern American academic jurisprudence. At the end of the article the author comes to the conclusion that the dark sides of modern legal science — the administrators who want to enhance the reps of their schools, mediocrity, the rankings, the status insecurities of young faculty members — are likely to make the situation worse.

Keywords:

Legal theory, jurisprudence, legal education, culture, aesthetics, CLS, law and society, ratings, spam jurisprudence

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Pierre Schlag , University of Colorado

Distinguished Professor; Byron R. White Professor of Law Jurisprudence

Ekaterina G. Samokhina, Department of theory and history of law and state, faculty of Law, HSE St. Petersburg

Assistant Dean for international cooperation, associate Professor

References

Balkin J. What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said: America’s Top Legal Experts Rewrite America’s Most Controversial Decision. New York University Press, 2005. 304 p.

Balkin J. What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation’s Top Legal Experts Rewrite America’s Landmark Civil Rights Decision. New York University Press, 2001. 336 p.

Beckett S. Waiting for Godot. Grove Press, 1954. 109 p.

Chapman B. The Rational and the Reasonable: Social Choice Theory and Adjudication. University of Chicago Law Review, 1994, no. 61, pp. 41–122.

Cover R.M. The Supreme Court, 1982 Term — Foreword: Nomos and Narrative. Harvard Law Review, 1983, no. 97, pp. 4–68.

Ely J.H. Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review. Harvard University Press, 1980. 268 p.

Hart H. L. A. Poniatie prava [Concept of law]. Transl. from engl. E. V. Afonasin, M.V.Babak, A.B.Didikin i S.V.Moiseev. Saint Petersburg, St. Petersburg. Univ. Press, 2007. 302 p. (In Russian)

Messud C. The Emperor’s Children. New York, Vintage Books, 2006. 478 p.

Monk R. Ludwig Wittgenstein: The Duty of Genius. London, 1990. 654 p.

Schlag P. Normative and Nowhere To Go. Stanford Law Review, 1997, no. 43, pp. 167–191.

Schlag P. Law and Phrenology. Harvard Law Review, 1997, no. 110, pp. 877–921.

Schlag P. My Dinner at Langdell’s. Buffalo Law Review, 2004, no.52, pp.851–863.

Schlegel J. H. Langdell’s Legacy or, The Case of the Empty Envelope. Stanford Law Review, 1984, no. 36, pp. 1517–1533.

Published

01.02.2017

How to Cite

Schlag , P., & Samokhina, E. G. (2017). Spam jurisprudence, air law, and the rank anxiety of nothing happening. Pravovedenie, 61(1), 135–173. Retrieved from https://pravovedenie.spbu.ru/article/view/6720

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)