Дискурс-анализ в исследовании индивидуального правосознания

Marina I.  Pantykina

Authors

Marina I. Pantykina Togliatti State University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7712-2124

Abstract

The article presents an experience of the discourse analysis as a method of phenomenological and linguistic interpretation of the legal discourse. Its text form constitutes objectified phenomena of the individual legal consciousness. Systematic research is achieved by resolving interrelated issues consecutively. In particular, the article presents a justification of theoretical and methodological features and a comparative analysis of the basic development areas of the discourse analysis and reveals the complexity of studying the individual legal consciousness. The paper shows that intentions of the individual legal consciousness determine the discourse content and form, the positions of its participants. They transform the old meanings of law and generate the new ones which, in their turn, create a common understanding of legal realities and form the space of social practices. The author argues that the linguistic version of the discourse analysis is the most effective method of studying the individual legal consciousness, and the phenomenological approach enables to identify it as an essential characteristic of a legal actor implemented as a process of constitution and updating the meanings of legal judgments. The article compares the legal and ordinary legal discourses, thus identifying their common subjectified components, namely attitudes, identity and competence. In addition, the same components are used as parameters of the discourse analysis. The paper shows how these components provide the coordination between the discourse components namely a text, speech acts, consciousness of a speaker and a listener, as well as facilitate the study of the individual legal consciousness phenomena. The outcomes of the presented experience of the discourse analysis prove the prospect of using its typical methods of phenomenological and linguistic interpretation in the study of legal discourses, and in the study of manifestations of positivity (loyalty) and deformation of individual legal consciousness.

Keywords:

discourse analysis, discourse, individual legal consciousness, phenomenology, constitution, deformation, attitude, identity, semiotic and narrative competence, discourse competence

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Marina I. Pantykina, Togliatti State University

doctor of philosophical sciences, associate professor, professor of the Department of History and Philosophy

References

Agamben G. Homo sacer: potere sovrano e la nuda vita. (Rus. ed.: Agamben G. Homo sacer. Suverennaia vlast’ i golaia zhizn’. Moscow, Europe Publ., 2011. 256 p.) (Russian trans.)

Belkano E. A. Loial’nost’ pravosoznaniia [Loyalty of justice]. Rossiiskii iuridicheskii zhurnal [The Russian Legal Magazine], 1996, no. 3, pp. 74–84. (In Russian)

Bergson H. Essai sur les données immédiates de la conscience. Bergson H. Coll. Op. 4 vols. (Rus. ed.: Bergson H. Opyt o neposredstvennykh dannykh soznaniia. Materiia i pamiat’. T. 1. Moscow, Moscow club Publ., 1992. 327 p.) (Russian trans.)

Bourdieu P. Sociologie de l’espace social. (Rus. ed.: Bourdieu P. Sotsial’noe prostranstvo: polia i praktiki. Moscow, Institute of Experimental Sociology, St. Petersburg, Aleteya Publ., 2005. 576 p.) (Russian trans.)

Chestnov I.L. Kriticheskii diskurs-analiz kak metod postklassicheskoi teorii prava [Critical discourse analysis as a method of post-classical theory of law]. Bulletin of Moscow City Pedagogical University. Ser. “Jurisprudence”, 2014, no.1 (13), pp.67–74. (In Russian)

Chestnov I. L. Sostoianie sovremennoi iuridicheskoi nauki: mneniia ekspertov [The states of modern jurisprudence: expert opinion]. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’ [Social studies and the present], 2016, no. 2, pp. 155–163. (In Russian)

Dennet D. [Why each of us is a novelist]. Iulina N. S. Golovolomki problemy soznaniia. Kontseptsiia Deniela Denneta [Logical problem of consciousness. Concept Daniel Dennett]. Moscow, Canon + Publ., 2004, pp. 210–219. (Russian trans.)

Devyatkin A.A. Iavlenie sotsial’noi ustanovki v psikhologii KhKh veka: Monografiia [The phenomenon of social settings in the psychology of the twentieth century: Monograph]. Kaliningrad, Publishing House of the Kaliningrad University, 1999. 309 p. (In Russian)

Elkins J. V chem sut’ narrativnoi iurisprudentsii? [What is the law of narrative?]. Pravovedenie [Proceedings of the higher educational institutions. Jurisprudence], 2011, no. 6, pp. 194–206. (Russian trans.)

Greimas A., Kurt J. Semiotics. Explanatory Dictionary of the language of the theory. (Rus. ed.: Greimas A., Kurt J. Semiotika. Ob”iasnitel’nyi slovar’ teorii iazyka Moscow, Rainbow Publ., 1983, pp. 483–500). (Russian trans.)

Hajiyev G.A. Russkaia filosofiia prava V.V.Bibikhina [Russian philosophy of law of V.V.Bibikhin]. Rossiiskii ezhegodnik teorii prava [The Russian Yearbook of the Theory of Law], no. 4, 2011. St. Petersburg, LLC “University Publishing Consortium”, 2012, pp. 9–34. (In Russian)

Husserl E. Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie. Eine Einleitung in die phänomenologische Philosophie (Rus. ed.: Gusserl’ E. Krizis evropeiskikh nauk i transtsendental’naia filosofiia. Vvedenie v fenomenologicheskuiu filosofiiu. St. Petersburg, Vladimir Dal, 2004. 400 p.) (Russian trans.)

Husserl E. Kartezianskie razmyshleniia [Cartesian Meditations]. St. Petersburg, Science: Juventa, 1998. Available at: http://philosophy.ru/library/husserl/kartesianische_meditationen.html_Toc35695651 (accessed: 18.07.2016). (In Russian)

Husserl G. Pravo i mir [Recht und Welt]. Izvestiia vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii. Pravovedenie [Proceedings of the higher educational institutions. Jurisprudence], 2015, no. 3, pp. 153–189. (In Russian)

Ilyin I. A. O sushchnosti pravosoznaniia [On the essence of justice]. Moscow, Rarog Publ., 1993. 235 p. (In Russian)

Isakov V. A. A platit’ nam [And to Pay Us]. Soviet Russia, 1991, December 31 (Op. by: Belkin A. A. Ofitsial’noe naimenovanie gosudarstva (fragment lektsii) [The official name of the state (lecture excerpt)]. Pravovedenie [Proceedings of the higher educational institutions. Jurisprudence], 1995, no. 3, pp. 118–138). (In Russian)

Karsavin I.T. Diskurs-analiz i ego primenenie v psikhologii [Discourse analysis and its application in psychology]. Voprosy psikhologii [Questions of psychology], 2007, no. 6, pp. 97–120. (In Russian)

Kemerov V.E. Kontseptsiia radikal’noi sotsial’nosti [Concept of Radical Social]. Voprosy filosofii [Problems of Philosophy], 1999, no. 7, pp. 3–13. (In Russian)

Kozhemyakin E.A. Diskursnyi podkhod k izucheniiu kul’tury [Discursive approach to culture]. Sovremennyi diskurs-analiz. Metodologiia: kontseptual’nye obosnovaniia [Modern discourse analysis. Methodology: conceptual study], vol. 1, iss. 1. 2009. Electronic Journal. Available at: http://www.discourseanalysis.org/ada1_1.shtml (accessed: 17.07.2016). (In Russian)

Kozhemyakin E.A. Iuridicheskii diskurs kak kul’turnyi fenomen: struktura i smysloobrazovanie: mat-ly internet-konferentsii “Iurislingvistika: sudebnaia lingvisticheskaia ekspertiza, lingvokonfliktologiia, iuridiko-lingvisticheskaia germenevtika” [Legal discourse as a cultural phenomenon: the structure and smysloobrazovanie. Proceedings of the Internet conference “Yurislingvistika: forensic linguistic examination lingvokonfliktologiya, legal and linguistic hermeneutics”]. Barnaul, Publishing House of the Altai State University, 2012. Available at: http://konference.siberia-expert.com/index/kozhemjakin_2_stranica/0-8 (accessed: 07/16/2016). (In Russian)

Kravitz W. Narrativnaia iurisprudentsiia ili teoriia pravovoi kommunikatsii? Razmyshleniia o fenomenologii povestvovaniia prava [Narrative jurisprudence or legal theory of communication? Reflections on the phenomenology of the narrative right]. Pravovedenie [Proceedings of the higher educational institutions. Jurisprudence], 2012, no. 1, pp. 18–32. (In Russian)

Makarov M. L. Osnovy teorii diskursa [Fundamentals of discourse]. Moscow, ITDGK “Gnosis”, 2003. 280 p. (In Russian)

Pantykina M.I. Konstituirovanie prava kak protsess ego smysloobrazovaniia [The constitution of the right to a process of meaning formation]. Srednerusskii vestnik obshchestvennykh nauk [Srednerussky Gazette of Social Sciences], 2009, no. 2, pp. 25– 30. (In Russian)

Petrulevich I. A., Mikhailova O. Yu., Romanenko O. A., Tselikovsky S. B. Osobennosti pravosoznaniia i problemy formirovaniia grazhdanskogo obshchestva v sovremennoi Rossii [Features of justice and the problem of formation of a civil society in modern Russia]. Teoriia i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiia [Theory and practice of social development], 2013, no. 4, pp. 159–165. (In Russian)

Phillips L. J., Jorgensen M. V. Discourse analysis. The theory and method (Rus. ed.: Fillips L. Dzh., Iorgensen M. V. Diskurs-analiz. Teoriia i metod. Kharkiv, Publishing House of the Humanities Center, 2008. 354 p.) (Russian trans.)

Samokhina E.G. Pravo i narrativ. Predislovie k lektsii Dzh. Elkinsa “V chem sut’ narrativnoi iurisprudentsii?” [Law and narrative. Introduction to lectures J. Elkins “What is the law of narrative?”]. Pravovedenie [Proceedings of the higher educational institutions. Jurisprudence], 2011, no. 6, pp. 186–193. (In Russian)

Smirnov A. G., Kiselev I. Yu. Identichnost’ v meniaiushchemsia mire: ucheb. posobie [Identity in a Changing World: A Tutorial]. Yaroslavl, Publishing House of the Yaroslavl State University, 2002. 300 p. (In Russian)

Smirnova N. M. Sotsial’naia fenomenologiia v izuchenii sovremennogo obshchestva [Social phenomenology is the study of modern society]. Moscow, Canon +: ROOI “Rehabilitation”, 2009. 400 p. (In Russian)

Sochivko D. V., Simakov T. A. Teoriia i metodika issledovaniia individual’nogo pravosoznaniia i ego infantilizatsii i kriminalizatsii [Theory and methods of study of the individual and his sense of justice and criminalization infantilization]. Prikladnaia iuridicheskaia psikhologiia [Applied legal psychology], 2015, no. 2, pp. 24–39. (In Russian)

Temnova E.V. [Modern approaches to the study of discourse]. Iazyk, soznanie, kommunikatsiia: sb. statei [Language consciousness, communication: Coll. Articles]. Eds. V. V. Red, A. I. Izotov. Moscow, MAKS Press Publ., 2004, vol. 26, pp. 24–32. (In Russian)

Trotsuk I.V. Diskursivnoe konstruirovanie sotsial’noi real’nosti: kontseptual’nye osnovaniia i empiricheskie priemy razoblacheniia “skvernykh” praktik [Discursive construction of social reality: conceptual foundations and empirical methods of exposing “abominable” practices]. Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie [Sociological Review], 2014, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 206–224. (In Russian)

Van Dijk T. A. By the definition of discourse. Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London, 1998. Available at: http://psyberlink.flogiston.ru/internet/bits/vandijk2.htm (accessed: 17.07.2016). (Russian trans.)

Van Dijk T.A. Diskurs i dominirovanie [Introduction: Discourse and Domination]. Sovremennyi diskurs-analiz. Metodologiia: kontseptual’nye obosnovaniia [Modern discourse analysis. Methodology: conceptual study]. Vol. 1. T. 1. 2009. Electronic Journal. Available at: http://www.discourseanalysis.org/ada1_1.shtml (reference date 17.07.2016) (Russian trans.)

Zakharova O. V. Ofitsial’nyi diskurs prav cheloveka v postkommunisticheskoi Rossii: ot liberalizma k paternalizmu [The official discourse of human rights in post-communist Russia, from liberalism to paternalism]. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’ [Social studies and the present], 2016, no. 2, pp. 82–93. (In Russian)