Concepts of limitation periods in UK and US law

Authors

  • Veronika G Malysheva  St. Petersburg State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu25.2020.403

Abstract

In the article the author analyzes the statute of limitations under Russian law and the law of Great Britain and the USA.The current legal regulation of limitation periods in Russia is based simultaneously on two mutually exclusive concepts: on the one hand, the Civil Code of the Russian Federation indicates that the application of limitation periods prescribes that the fact of violation of a right and the determination of the person who violated this right must be established, on the other hand, the Civil Procedural Code of the Russian Federation and the Arbitration Procedural Code of the Russian Federation provide for the possibility of terminating legal  proceedings without examining the merits of the case and without examining the evidence. While each of these concepts is obviously acceptable, the combination of various tasks within the framework of one institution demonstrates the inconsistency of legislative regulation. In this regard, the study of other countries’ experience concerning the purpose of the institution is of particular importance. A comparative legal analysis carried out by the author illustrates that the law lacks a unified concept and ideology of a mechanism providing for the refusal to resolve a dispute in judicial proceedings due to the expiration of a certain period of time. In the law of Great Britain and the USA, there exist several mechanisms of limitation, each of which is based on certain principles and operates according to its own rules. In the framework of this article, the author attempts a comprehensive comparative legal analysis of the statute of limitations in order to provide a basis for finding an answer to the question concerning the legal nature of the modern institute of limitation in Russian law

Keywords:

exception, statute of limitations, limitation periods, defendant’s remedy, right to claim, institute of prescription

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Ailes, Edgar H. 1941. Substance and Procedure in the Conflict of Laws. Michigan Law Review 39 (3): 392–418.

Fort, Kathryn E. 2009. The New Laches: Creating Title Where None Existed. George Mason Law Review 16 (2): 357–401.

Furmston, Michael P. 1991. Law of Contract. 12th ed. London, Butterworths.

Garner, Bryan A. (ed.). 2014. Black ̓ s law dictionary. 10th ed. Thomson Reuters.

Grossman, Margaret Rosso. 1980. Statutes of Limitations and the Conflict of Laws: Modern Analysis. Arizona State Law Journal 1: 1–65.

Krakoff, Sarah. 2005. City of Sherill v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York: A Regretfull Postscript to the Taxation Chapter in Cohen ̓ s Handbook of Federal Indian Law. Tulsa Law Review 41 (5): 5–19.

Leflar, Robert A. 1984. The New Conflicts-Limitations Act. Mercer Law Review 35: 461–481.

McGee, Andrew. 2020. Limitation periods. 8th ed. London, Sweet and Maxwell.

Osing, Stefan, Neumeier, Fabian. 2012. Limitation periods in construction law, an international overview and comparison, exemplified by common and the civil law jurisdictions. Construction Law International 7: 35–41.

Shipman, Benjamin J. 1923. Handbook of Common-Law Pleading. 3rd ed. St. Paul, MN, West Publishing Co..

Sime, Stuart, French, Derek (eds). 2013. Blackstone's Civil Practice 2013: The Commentary. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

St. Eve, Amy, Zuckerman, Michael A. 2013. The Forgotten Pleading. The Federal Courts Law Review 7 (1): 153–177.

Symeonides, Symeon C. 2016. Choice of Law. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Published

31.12.2020

How to Cite

Malysheva , V. G. (2020). Concepts of limitation periods in UK and US law. Pravovedenie, 64(4), 483–495. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu25.2020.403