Alf Ross on the concept of law and legal validity: the realistic approach

Authors

  • Natal'ja Sergeevna Vasil'eva

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu25.2018.105

Abstract

Alf Ross is one of the most prominent representatives of Scandinavian legal realism and one of the main participants of the discussion on legal validity. This article explores the main points of his realistic legal concept. Ross uses a unique mixture of the main tenets of logical positivism and the Uppsala school of philosophy to suggest a new project of theoretical legal science, which implies, among other things, that its key element is specific legal “validity” — in interrelation with legal “effectiveness” — and not the concept of law. This brings the author to the necessity of a rather thorough linguistic inquiry of various Russian, English, Danish, etc. terms related to the concept of validity, which leads to the conclusion that correct Russian translation of Ross’s terms “gyldighet” and “gælden” is “dejstvitel’nost’” and “dejstvennost’”, respectively. Together with the analysis of Ross’s ideas about the province and proper methodology of jurisprudence this allows the author to fully and accurately reconstruct such aspects of Ross’s legal theory as content and role of the concept of law as well as realistic concept of legal validity. The author argues that specific interrelation between “validity” and “effectiveness” — and its underlying principles — is also a key to understanding the whole Ross’s concept of new realistic jurisprudence, which encompass a differentiation between legal knowledge and legal politics, an empirical approach to legal cognition, reducing the gap between legal theory and practice. Other topics, specifically addressed in this article, are Hart — Ross critical exchange and Ross as a legal realist.

Keywords:

legal validity, validity of law, legal effectiveness, concept of law, Alf Ross, Scandinavian legal realism, binding force, normativity of law

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

References

Aarnio A. Essays on the Doctrinal Study of Law. Springer Netherlands, 2011. XIV, 222 p.

Antonov M. V. Al’f Ross o probleme deistvitel’nosti (validnosti) prava [Alf Ross on the Problem of the Validity of Law]. Russian Yearbook of Legal Theory, 2009, no. 2, pp. 454–457. (In Russian)

Antonov M. V. Skandinavskaia shkola pravovogo realizma [Scandinavian School of Legal Realism]. Russian Yearbook of Legal Theory, 2008, no. 1, pp. 645–668. (In Russian)

Bix B. H. L. A. Hart and the Hermeneutic Turn in Legal Theory. SMU Law Review, 1999, no. 52, pp. 167–199.

Bulygin E. Valid Law and Law in Force (1999). Bulygin E. Essays in Legal Philosophy. Oxford University Press UK, 2015, pp. 284–292.

Bulygin E. V. [Valid Law and Law in Force]. Bulygin E. Izbrannye raboty po teorii i filosofii prava [The Selected Writings in Theory and Philosophy of Law]. Eds. M. V. Antonov, E. N. Lisanyuk, S. I. Maksimova. St. Petersburg, Alef-press, 2016, pp. 209–221. (In Russian)

Bulygin E. V. Poniatie deistvennosti [The Concept of Effectiveness]. Translated from German by M. V. Antonov. Izvestiia vuzov. Pravovedenie, 2016, no. 4, pp. 16–33. (In Russian)

Eliasz K., Jakubiec M. The Vienna Circle and the Uppsala School as philosophical inspirations for the Scandinavian Legal Realism. Semina Scientiarum, 2016, no. 15, pp. 107–123.

Eng S. Lost in the System or Lost in Translation? The Exchanges between Hart and Ross. Ratio Juris, 2011, vol. 24, iss. 1, pp. 112–246.

Fittipaldi E. Chapter 12. Introduction: Continental Legal Realism. A Treatise of Legal Philosophy and General Jurisprudence. Vol. 12. Legal Philosophy in the Twentieth Century: The Civil Law World. Tome 2. Main Orientations and Topics. Eds. E. Pattaro, C. Roversi. Dordrecht, Springer, 2016, pp. 297–318. Hart H. L. A. [Scandinavian Realism]. Translated from English by V. V. Ogleznev.

Hart H. L. A. Filosofiia i iazyk prava [Philosophy and Language of Law]. Moscow, Kanon+ ROOI “Reabilitaciya” Publ., 2017, pp. 230–240. (In Russian)

Hart H. L. A. Scandinavian Realism. The Cambridge Law Journal, vol. 17, no. 2. November 1959, pp. 233–240.

Holtermann J. v. H. “This Cannot Be its Meaning in the Mouth of the Judge”: The Case for the New English Language Translation of Alf Ross’s On Law and Justice, Forthcoming on Oxford University Press. Utopía y praxis latinoamericana: revista internacional de filosofía iberoamericana y teoría social. 2016, vol. 20, no. 71. iCourts Working Paper Series N 53. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2770464 (accessed: 19.11.2017).

Lapaeva V. V. [Legal Principle of Formal Equality as a Triune of Equal Measure, Freedom and Justice]. Priznanie prava i printsip formal’nogo ravenstva: sb. trudov mezhdunar. nauch. konf. (Voronezh, 10–11 iiunia 2015 g.) [Recognition of Law and the Principle of Formal Equality: Proceedings of an International Science Conference (Voronezh, 10–11 June 2015)]. Eds. V. V. Denisenco, M. A. Belyaev. Moscow, Sovremennaya ehkonomika i pravo Publ., 2015, pp. 8–14. (In Russian)

Pattaro E. A Treatise of Legal Philosophy and General Jurisprudence. Vol. 1. The Law and the Right: A Reappraisal of the Reality that Ought to Be. Springer Netherlands, 2007. XXXIV, 458 p.

Peczenik A. On Law and Reason. Springer Netherlands, 2008. XVIII, 364 p.

Ross A. A Textbook of International Law: General Part. London, Longmans, Green and Co., 1947. 313 p.

Ross A. Directives and norms. New York, Humanities Press, 1968. ix, 188 p.

Ross A. O samoreferentsii i zagadke v konstitutsionnom prave [On Self-Reference and a Puzzle in Constitutional Law]. Translated from English by A. A. Kraevsky. Izvestiia vuzov. Pravovedenie. 2012, no. 3, pp. 53–73. (In Russian)

Ross A. On Law and Justice. Berkeley, University of California Press, 1959. 383 p.

Ross A. Towards a Realistic Jurisprudence: A Criticism of the Dualism in Law. Translated from the Danish by Annie I. Fausbell. Copenhagen, E. Munksgaard, 1946. 304 p.

Ross A. Validnost’ i konflikt mezhdu pravovym pozitivizmom i estestvennym pravom [Validity and the Conflict between Legal Positivism and Natural Law]. Translated from English by M. V. Antonov. Russian Yearbook of Legal Theory. 2009, no. 2, pp. 458–473. (In Russian)

Ross A. Virkelighed og gyldighed i retslæren. En kritik af den teoretiske retsvidenskabs grundbegreber [Reality and Validity in Jurisprudence. A Critique of the Basic Concepts of Theoretical Legal Science]. Copenhagen, Levin & Munksgaard, 1934.

p.

Schauer F. Editor’s Introduction. The Theory of Rules. Eds. K. N. Llewellyn & F. Schauer. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 2011, pp. 1–28.

Schauer F., Wise V. J. Legal Positivism as Legal Information. Cornell Law Review. 1997, no. 82, pp. 1080–1110.

Shapiro S. J. What is the internal point of view? Yale Law School Faculty Scholarship. Faculty Scholarship Series. 2006. Paper 1336. Available at: http://digitalcommons.law. yale.edu/fss_papers/1336 (accessed: 10.01.2018).

Strang J. Two Generations of Scandinavian Legal Realists. Retfærd Årgang 32. 2009, no. 1/124, pp. 61–82.

Timoshina E. V. Teoriia i sotsiologiia prava L. I. Petrazhitskogo v kontekste klassicheskogo i postklassicheskogo pravoponimaniia. Dis. d-ra iurid. nauk [Petrażyckis Theory and Sociology of Law in the Context of Classical and Postclassical Legal Theory. Dr. Sc. Thesis]. Moscow, 2013. 556 p. (In Russian)

Varlamova N. V. [Formal Equality as a Fundamental Principle of Law in Action]. Priznanie prava i printsip formal’nogo ravenstva: sb. trudov mezhdunar. nauch. konf. (Voronezh, 10–11 iiunia 2015 g.) [Recognition of Law and the Principle of Formal Equality: Proceedings of an International Science Conference (Voronezh, 10–11 June 2015)]. Eds. V. V. Denisenco, M. A. Belyaev. Moscow, Sovremennaia ehkonomika i pravo Publ., 2015, pp. 35–40. (In Russian)

Varlamova N. V. [Law and Morals: Correlation in the Context of Different Legal Theories]. Vzaimodeistvie prava i morali: materialy Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii [Interaction of Law and Morals: Proceedings of an International Science Conference]. Ed. by T. A. Soshnikova. Moscow, Moscow University for the Humanities, 2014, pp. 56–62. (In Russian)

Vasilyeva N. S. Problema deistvitel’nosti prava v antimetafizicheskoi traditsii (kontseptsiia Al’fa Rossa) [The Problem of Legal Validity in the Anti-Metaphysical Approach (Alf Ross’s Conception)]. Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriia: Iuridicheskie nauki [RUDN Journal of Law]. 2017, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 396–414. (In Russian)

Правоведение, Том 62, No 1, 2018

Downloads

Published

01.02.2018

How to Cite

Vasil'eva, N. S. (2018). Alf Ross on the concept of law and legal validity: the realistic approach. Pravovedenie, 62(1), 84–117. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu25.2018.105

Issue

Vol. 62 No. 1 (2018)

Section

History of the legal thought

License

Articles of "Pravovedenie" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.