The constitutionalisation of private law: Comparative analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu25.2024.107Abstract
This article is divided into four parts. The first part discloses the definition of constitutionalisation of private law, which means the influence of fundamental (constitutional) human rights on private law. The second part is devoted to the analysis of the key issue related to the topic of constitutionalisation of private law — how and to what extent fundamental (constitutional) human rights influence private law. In this regard, the four models of private law constitutionalisation identified in comparativism and the pro/contra arguments for each of them are examined. The third part of the article examines which of these models is embodied in foreign legal orders (in particular, Germany, the Neatherlands, Canada, South Africa and the UK). The author concludes that the most widespread is the model of indirect influence of fundamental human rights on private law. The fourth part of the article provides a comparative legal analysis of the application of the indirect model of constitutionalisation. This model identifies two approaches that characterise the attitude of foreign lawmakers to human rights provisions in different ways. The first approach, the “strong” indirect model, assumes that human rights provisions enshrine rights that constitute binding rules. This approach is represented in particular in the UK. The second, the “weak” indirect model, views human rights provisions as enshrining values and being principles to be taken into account alongside other circumstances. This approach is represented in particular in Germany.
Keywords:
publicization of private law, constitutionalization of private law, privatization of human rights, human rights, horizontal relations, Drittwirkung
Downloads
References
Arrubla Paucar, Jaime A. 2010. La Constitucionalizacion Del Derecho Privado. Nuevo Derecho 5: 43–73. Available at: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=5549014 (accessed: 26.11.2023).
Banakas, Stathis. 2006. The Constitutionalisation of Private Law in the UK: Is There an Emperor inside The New Clothes? Constitutionalisation of Private Law. Leiden, Boston: 83–96.
Barak, Aron. 1996. Constitutional Human Rights and Private Law. Review Constitutional Studies 3: 218–281.
Belov, Sergei Aleksandrovich. 2014. Direct Application of the Constitution by the Courts in the Russian Federation. State and Law 1: 45–55. (In Russian)
Bhana, Deekhsla. 2015. The Substance of Contractual Autonomy in the Twenty-First Century: The South African Experience. Verfassung und Recht in Übersee. Law and Politics in Africa, Asia and Latin America 48: 491–515. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26160059 (accessed: 20.11.2023).
Canaris, Claus-Wilhelm. 1999. Grundrechte and Privatrecht — Eine Zwischenbilanz. Berlin; New York.
Cermen Barona-Villafuerte, Paulina Del, Nápoles-Napoles, Yanet. 2021. La constitucionalization del derecho privado. Digital Publisher. 6: 203–211. Available at: https://bibliotecadigital.iue.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12717/2320/1/271-Texto%20del%20art%c3%adculo-4795-1-10-20200911.pdf (accessed: 21.08.2023).
Сlassen, Сlaus D. 1997. Die Drittwirkung der Grundrechte in der Rechtsprechung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts. Archiv des öffentlichen Rechts 122: 65–107.
Colley, Linda. 2021. The Gun, the Ship & the Pen: Warfare, Constitutions and the Making of the Modern World. New York, Liveright.
Corrin, Jennifer. 2009. From Horizontal and Vertical to Lateral: Extending the Effect of Human Rights in Post Colonial Legal Sysytems of the South Pacific. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 58: 31–71.
Dürig, Günter. 1956. Grundrechte und Zivilrechtsprechung. Festschrift für Nawtasky. Munich, Isar Verlag.
Ewing, Keith D. 1999. The Human Rights Act and Parliamentary Democracy. The Modern Law Review 62: 79–99.
Gadzhiev, Gadis A. 2004. Constitutional principles of Market Economy: Development of Fundamentals of Civil Law in the Decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation. Moscow, Iurist Publ. (In Russian)
González Dávila, Richard. 2011. La constitucionalización del Derecho privado y la acción de protección frente a particulares. Revista de Derecho 16: 57–95. Available at: https://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/foro/article/view/400/395 (accessed: 22.08.2023).
Espinosa, Fabricio Mantilla. 2007. La constitucionalización del derecho privado. Revista Oficial del Poder Judicial 1: 245–262.
Flumme, Werner. 1992. Allgemeiner Teil des Burgerlichen Rechts. Bd. II. Berlin, Springer.
Heldt, Amélie. 2023. Intensivere Drittwirkung: Die mittelbare Drittwirkung der Meinungsfreiheit in Öffentlichkeiten der digitalen Gesellschaft. Eine verfassungsrechtliche, rechtsvergleichende und interdisziplinäre Analyse. Tübingen, Mohr Siebek.
Hogg, Peter W. 1992. Constitutional Law of Canada. 3nd ed. Caswell. Available at: https://archive.org/details/constitutionalla00hogg_0/page/n7/mode/2up (accessed: 22.08.2023).
Horan, Michael. 1976. Contemporary Constitutionalism and Legal Relationships between Individuals. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 25: 848–867.
Hunter-Heinen, Myriam. 2007. Horizontal application of Human Rights in France: the Triumph of the European Convention on Human Rights. Human Rights and the Private Sphere — A Comparative
Study. Eds D. Oliver, J. Fedtke. London, New York, Routledge-Cavendish: 98–124. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2626442 (accessed: 22.08.2023).
Hunt, Murray. 1998. The Horrizontal Effect of the Human Rights Act. Public Law: 423–443.
Kartsov, Aleksei Sergeevich. 2023. Ariadne’s Thread or the Road to Nowhere? Discourse of Fundamental Rights in Foreign Private Law. Comparative Constitutional Review 4: 147–162. (In Russian)
Kruss, Vladimir I. 2016. Constitutionalization of Law: Basic Theory. Moscow, Norma Publ. (In Russian)
Laurenz, Karl. 1983. Lehrbuch des Schuldrechts. 11nd ed. Munich, Beck.
Leight, Ian. 1999. Horizontal Rights, the Human Rights Act and Privacy: Lessons from the Commonwealth? The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 48: 57–87.
Leisner, Walter. 1960. Grundrecht und Privatrecht. Munich, Beck.
Lewan, Kenneth. 1968. The Significance of Constitutional Rights for Private Law: Theory and Practice in West Germany. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 17: 571–601.
Lindenbergh, Siewert. 2006. The Constitutionalisation of Private Law in The Netherlands. Constitutionalisation of Private Law. Leiden, Boston: 97–128.
Markesenis, Basil. 1999. Privacy, Freedom of Expression, and the Horizontal Effect of the Human Rights Bill: Lessons from Germany. Law Quarterly Review 115: 47–88.
Matscher, Franz, Petzild, Herbert. 1990. Protecting Human Rights: the European Demetion. 2nd ed. Koln, Berlin, Bonn, Munich, Carl Heymanns.
Neuman, Franz Leopold, Nipperdey, Hans Karl. Scheuner, Urlich. 1954. Die Würde des Menschen. Vol. II. Berlin.
Oeter, Stefan. 1994. Drittwirkung der Grundrechte und die Autonomie des Privatrechts: Ein Beitrag zu den funktionell-rechtlichen Dimensionen der Drittwirkungsdebatte. Archiv des öffentlichen Rechts 119: 529–563.
Phillipson, Gavin. 1999. The Human Rights Act, ‘Horizontal Effect’ and the Common Law: a Bang or a Whimper? The Modern Law Review 62: 824–849.
Pound, Roscoe. 1933. Hierarchy of Sources and Forms in Different Systems of Law. Tulane Law Review 7: 475–487.
Quint, Peter. 1989. Free Speech and Private Law in German Constitutional Theory. Maryland Law Review 48: 247–349.
Raday, Frances. 2000. Privatization of Human Rights and Abuse of Power. Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence 13: 103–136.
Rudokvas, Anton D., Thomas, Philip J. 2023. Co-existence and harmonisation of different legal traditions in South Africa. Pravovedenie 67 (2): 115–136. (In Russian)
Sales, Philip. Constitutional Values in The Common Law of Obligations. Cambridge Freshfields Annual Lecture. Available at: https://www.supremecourt.uk/docs/Lord%20Sales%20-%20Constitutional%20values%20in%20the%20common%20law%20of%20obligations.pdf (accessed: 22.07.2023).
Schwabe, Jürgen. 1975. Bundesverfassungsgericht und ‘Drittwirkung’ der Grundrechte. Archiv des öffentlichen Rechts 100: 442–470.
Slattery, Brian. 1985. The Charter of Rights and Freedoms — Does It Bind Private Persons? Canadian Bar Review 63: 148–161. Available at: https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/scholarly_works/646/ (accessed: 22.08.2023).
Stein, Sarah K. 2022. Lüth and Elfes — A German Approach to a Horizontal Effect of Fundamental Rights. Available at: https://blog-iacl-aidc.org/new-blog-3/2022/6/14/lth-and-elfes-agerman-approach-to-a-horizontal-effect-of-fundamental-rights (accessed: 28.10.2023).
Taylor, Greg. 2002. The Horizontal Effect of Human Rights Provisions, the German Model and its Applicability to Common Law Jurisdictions. King’s Law Journal 13 (2): 187–218.
Visser, C. 2022. Adjudicative Subsidiarity, the ‘Horizontality Simpliciter’ Approach and Personality Rights: Outlining an Integrated and Constitutional Reading Strategy to the Law of Personality. De Jure Law Journal 55: 124–142. Available at: https://www.dejure.up.ac.za/visser-cj (accessed: 04.11.2023).
Wade, William. 1998. The United Kingdom’s Bill of Rights. Constitutional Reform in the United King-dom:
Practice and Principles. Eds I. Hare, C. Forsuth. Oxford, Hart Publishing. Available at: https://books.google.ru/books?hl=ru&lr=&id=YEEgDsCYmbQC&oi=fnd&pg=PR7&dq=constitutional+reform+in+the+UK+Practice+and+principles+hFilipDzh.are&ots=4Iz_DbZtDC&sig=IavhIJY30D0_SW8P9LssKMycOHA&redir_esc=y v=onepage&q=constitutional%20reform%20in%20the%20UK%20Practice%20and%20principles%20hare&f=false (accessed: 04.11.2023).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Articles of "Pravovedenie" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.
