“La Trahison des Images”: Intentional discrepancy between individual will and its declaration

Authors

  • Alexander Y. Zezekalo Sain Petersburg State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu25.2023.304

Abstract

The paper is intended to pursue the old issue of the underlying basis of contracts as well as legal transactions on the whole. The main idea is, consequently, to explore, using example of vices of will caused by intentional discrepancy between the internal will and its declaration, which theoretical pattern should be applied to the legislative regulation, which is in force nowadays first of all within the civil law legal space. In particular, with the aim of answering, in a way, the question whether it is really obvious that the dogma of the autonomy of the will here is no longer the basis of the rules of contract. Brief comparative overview demonstrates that despite the significantly different viewpoints of the doctrines as to the basis of legal transaction, and above all, a contract, many legal systems of continental Europe do take a serious account of the subjective element and proceed openly or implicitly from the necessity that the internal will should correspond to its external expression. At the same time, within the contract law, in some cases it is being spoken of consensus and its vices. However, if consensus in such cases means nothing but agreement on the parties’ intentions, we are still dealing with the same subjective approach, based to a large extent upon the central idea of the old will theory and its modifications, attaching at least considerable degree of importance to the individual will. 

Keywords:

contracts, transactions, fictitious transactions, sham transactions, simulation, vices of will

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Atiyah, Patrick S. 1996. Essays on Contract. Oxford, Clarendon Press.

Bénabent, Alain. 2021. Droit des obligations. 19 éd. Paris, LGDJ.

Brox, Hans, Walker, Wolf-Dietrich. 2007. Allgemeiner Teil des BGB. 31, neu bearb. Aufl. Köln, München, Carl Heymanns Verlag.

Cabrillac, Rémy. 2016. Droit des obligations. 12 éd. Paris, Dalloz.

Coing, Helmut. 1989. Europäisches Privatrecht. B. II. München, C. H. Beck.

Elegido, Juan M. 1993. A basic rationale for contract law. Persona y Derecho 28: 27–69.

James Gordley. 1993. The Philosophical Origins of Modern Contract Doctrine. Clarendon Law Series. Clarendon Press.

Larenz, Karl, Wolf, Manfred. 1997. Allgemeiner Teil des Bürgerlichen Rechts. 8 Aufl. München, C. H. Beck.

Medicus, Dieter. 2004. Bürgerliches Recht. 20 neub. Aufl. Köln, Berlin, München, Carl Heymanns Verlag.

Posner, Richard A. 1977. Economic Analysis of Law. 2nd ed. Little Brown and Company.

Rolland, Louise. 2006. “Qui dit contractuel, dit juste” (Fouillée)… en trois petits bonds, à reculons. McGill L. J. 51: 765–780.

von Savigny, Friedrich C. 1840. System des heutigen Römischen Rechts. B. III. Berlin, Veit & Comp.

Zimmermann, Reinhard. 1990. The Law of Obligations: Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition. Cape Town, Juta & Co.

Downloads

Published

28.09.2023

How to Cite

Zezekalo, A. Y. . (2023). “La Trahison des Images”: Intentional discrepancy between individual will and its declaration. Pravovedenie, 67(3), 305–313. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu25.2023.304