Contract with open terms in Scotland: A comparative legal perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu25.2023.203Abstract
The article focuses on contracts with open terms, that is, contracts in which the parties deliberately leave one or more terms open for future negotiations or unilateral supplementation by one of the parties (or a third party). In our paper, we refer to contracts with open terms in which an open term is subject to negotiations. Such contracts are not recognised by most jurisdictions (including as being too vague), but the Scottish legal system is sometimes argued to be an exception. In attempting to confirm this claim, it is found that the device called “a contract with open terms” is unknown to Scottish law, so a special comparative legal method is proposed to find an analogue on the Scottish “legal map”. This approach reveals that contracts with open terms in Scotland are concealed under several different names (most notably “agreement to agree”). It shows that although there is no uniform and consistent approach to such contracts, there are three tests which the courts use to answer the central question about such contracts, namely whether a contract with open terms is enforceable: the test for the essentiality of an open term, the test for whether an open term can be objectively implemented and the test for whether the parties have an intention to create legal relations. This analysis is accompanied by a comparative commentary describing how similar issues are dealt with in the UNIDROIT Principles and in another (besides Scotland) jurisdiction to which recognition of contracts with open terms is attributed, namely Russia. On the basis of the research carried out, a preferred order of application of the tests is proposed. The study of the topic is also preceded by a reference to the history and general characteristics of the Scottish legal system. In the course of this topic, we show that Scotland cannot be defined precisely enough through its generic characteristics as a mixed jurisdiction. In turning to the study of Scotland as an individual jurisdiction, it is noted that this system over time has begun to exhibit fewer and fewer of the attributes of a continental European family country.
Keywords:
contract with open terms, framework contract, agreement to agree, Scotland, UNIDROIT
Downloads
References
Basedow, Jürgen. 2014. Comparative Law and Its Clients. The American journal of comparative law 62 (4): 821–857.
Beale, Hugh, Fauvarque-Cosson, Bénédicte, Rutgers, Jacobien W., Vogenauer, Stefan (ed.). 2019.
Cases, Materials and Text on Contract Law. Oxford, UK, Hart Publishing.
Black, Gillian. 2011. Formation of Contract: The Role of Contractual Intention and Email Disclaimers. Juridical review 2: 97–119.
Braginskii, Mikhail I., Vitrianskii, Vasilii V. 2020. Contract law. General provisions. Moscow, Statut Publ. (In Russian)
Dozhdev, Dmitrii V. (ed.). 2008. Comparative law: state and development prospects. Rossiiskii ezhegodnik sravnitel’nogo prava. St. Petersburg. (In Russian)
Dubinchin, Aleksei A. 2015. English contract law: statutes, precedents, comments. The conclusion of the contract. Part 1. Yekaterinburg, Ural’skii rabochii Publ. (In Russian)
Du Plessis, Jacques. 2019. Comparative Law and the Study of Mixed Legal Systems. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law. R. Mathias, R. Zimmermann (ed.). 2nd ed. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Farran, Susan, Örücü, Esin, Donlan, Seán Patrick. (ed). 2014. A Study of Mixed Legal Systems: Endangered, Entrenched or Blended. Farnham, Surrey, England; Ashgate.
Frankenberg, Gunter. 1985. Critical Comparisons: Re-thinking Comparative Law. Harvard International Law Journal 26, 2 (Spring): 411–456.
Furmston, Michael, Norisada, Takao, Poole, Jill. 1998. Contract Formation and Letters of Intent. Chichester, John Wiley.
Hogg, Martin. 2011. Promises and Contract Law: Comparative Perspectives. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Karapetov, Artem G. (ed.). 2020. Contract law (general part): article-by-article commentary on articles 420–453 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation [Electronic edition. Revision 2.0]. Moscow, M-logos Publ. (In Russian)
Karapetov, Artem G. (ed.). 2022. Performance and Termination of an Obligation: Commentary on Articles 307–328 and 407–419 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation [Electronic edition. Revision 2.0]. Moscow, M-logos Publ. (In Russian)
Khuzziatov, Artur A. 2020. Framework contract (contract with open terms). Peterburgskaia tsivilistika 2.1. Sbornik nauchnykh rabot. Moscow, M-logos Publ.: 284–305. (In Russian)
Koblov, Anton S. 2013. Framework contract and contract with open terms as complex contractual structures. Zakon 1: 133–140. (In Russian)
Krasheninnikov, Evgenii A., Baigusheva, Iuliia V. 2013. Conclusion of the contract. Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii 5. (In Russian)
Kuznetsova, Ol’ga A. 2004. Presumptions in civil law. St. Petersburg. (In Russian)
Lake, Ralph B., Draetta, Ugo. 1994. Letters of Intent and Other Precontractual Documents: Comparative Analysis and Forms. Butterworths.
Lubbe, Gerhard. 2000. Formation of Contract. A History of Private Law in Scotland. 2: Obligations. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
MacQueen, Hector L. 2020. Contract Law in Scotland. 5th ed. London, Bloomsbury Professional.
McBryde, William W. 2007. The Law of Contract in Scotland. Edinburgh. Thomson, W. Green.
McKendrick, Ewan. 2019. Contract Law. London, Macmillan Education UK.
Örücü, Esin, Attwooll, Elspeth Coyle, Sean (ed.). 1996. Studies in Legal Systems: Mixed and Mixing. The Hague, Kluwer Law International.
Palmer, Vernon V. (ed.). 2012. Mixed Jurisdictions Worldwide: the Third Legal Family. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Poduzova, Ekaterina B. 2014. New contractual structures in the light of the draft law on amendments to the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. Zakon 8: 119–124. (In Russian)
Pokrovskii, Iosif A. 2020. Fundamental Problems of Civil Law. Moscow, Statut Publ. (In Russian)
Pozzo, Barbara. 2012. Comparative Law and Language. The Cambridge Companion to Comparative Law. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Reid, Elspeth. 2015. The evolution of Scottish law as a mixed legal system. Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava 15 (4): 144–178. (In Russian)
Reid, Kenneth G. C. 2003. The Idea of Mixed Legal Systems. Tulane Law Review 78, 1–2: 5–40.
Reimann, Mathias, Zimmermann, Reinhard. 2019. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law. 2nd ed. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Rudokvas, Anton. 2023. Paragraph 4 of Article 209 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation: the Future of One Illusion. Property law: yesterday, today, tomorrow: a collection of articles for the 50th anniversary of A. O. Rybalov. K. I. Karachkova (ed.); scientific ed. by A. D. Rudokvas. Moscow, Statute: 153–185. (In Russian)
Saidov, Akmal’ Kh. 2003. Comparative law. Basic legal systems of our time. Moscow, Iurist. (In Russian)
Saidov, Akmal’ Kh. 2021. Comparative law: academic textbook. Moscow, Norma, INFRA-M Publ. (In Russian)
Scottish Law Commission. Report on Review of Contract Law: Formation, Interpretation, Remedies for Breach, and Penalty Clauses. 2018. 252. Available at: http://www.scotlawcom.gov.uk/files/1115/2222/5222/Report_on_Review_of_Contract_Law_-_Formation_Interpretation_Remedies_for_Breach_and_Penalty_Clauses_Report_No_252.pdf (accessed: 20.09.2022).
Smits, Jan M. (ed.). 2006. Elgar Encyclopedia of Comparative Law. Edward Elgar Pub.
Stair’s Laws of Scotland: Stair Memorial Encyclopaedia. Butterworths LexisNexis. Available at: https://www.lexisweb.co.uk/sources/stair-memorial-encyclopaedia (accessed: 20.08.2022).
Stepanova, Irina E. 2007. Essential terms of the contract: problems of legislation. Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii 7. (In Russian)
Thomson, Stephen. 2014. Mixed Jurisdiction and the Scottish Legal Tradition: Reconsidering the Concept of Mixture. Journal of civil law studies 7, 1: 51–91.
UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts 2016. International Institute for the Unification of Private Law (UNIDROIT), Rome. 2016. Available at: https://www.unidroit.org/wp-ontent/uploads/2021/06/Unidroit-Principles-2016-English-i.pdf (accessed: 20.09.2022).
Vogenauer, Stefan (ed.). 2015. Commentary on the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts (PICC). 2nd ed. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Watson, Alan (ed.). 1993. Legal Transplants: an Approach to Comparative Law. University of Georgia Press.
Zhidkov, Oleg A. (ed.). 2003. History of state and law of foreign countries: textbook. In 2 parts. Moscow, Norma Publ. Part 2. (In Russian)
Zimmermann, Reinhard. 1992. The Law of Obligations: Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition. Juta.
Zimmermann, Reinhard. 2005. “Double Crossing”: A Comparison of Scottish and South African Law. lus Antiquum. Drevnee pravo 2 (16): 164–191. (In Russian)
Zweigert, Konrad, Hein Kötz. 1998. Introduction to Comparative Law. Translated from the German by Tony Weir. Third revised edition. Oxford, Clarendon Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Articles of "Pravovedenie" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.
