Сivil law information obligations under French law

Authors

  • Radik R. Lugmanov St. Petersburg State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu25.2020.203

Abstract

The article is the result of a study of the doctrine and practice of information obligations under French law, which initially did not recognize any broad information obligations. The development of this institution has been slow with the accumulation of doctrine and practice. There has been a gradual realization that solidarity, fairness and good faith require disclosure of information relevant to the decision to enter into a contract or implement a contract. Particularly noticeable was the expansion of information obligations in professional relationships. Much attention is paid to the doctrinal problem of defining information obligations using the necessary elements: material and psychological. Only the simultaneous presence of these elements on the debtor’s side and the absence of an inexcusable mistake on the creditor’s side testify to the presence of an information obligation. It is noted that one of the peculiarities of information obligations is the fact that, as a rule, the creditor learns about it when the obligation has already been violated. These examples of legislative regulation and court practice demonstrate the complexity of interaction between the institutions of error and fraud and the legal category of information obligations. The author of the article proposes to get acquainted with the generally accepted division of information obligations by chronological criterion and by the degree of content of the obligation. In general, it should be noted that this study will be useful for the beginning of the formation of the doctrine of information obligations, which is currently absent in Russian civil law.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Arkhipova, Anna G. 2017. Duty to provide Information under Article 307 (3) of the Russian Civil Code. Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiia Rossiiskoj Federatsii 2: 60–94. (In Russian)

Aryan, Shahram, Mirabbasi, Bagher. 2016. The good faith principle and its consequences in precontractual period: A comparative study on English and French law. Journal of Politics and Law 9 (2): 232–245.

Boyer, Olivier Frédéric. 1991. Le silence et le contrat: approche comparée. Montréal, McGill University.

Cicero, M. Tullius. 1913. De Officiis. With an English translation. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.

De Juglart, Michel. 1945. L’obligation de renseignements dans les contrats. Revue trimestrielle de Droit Civil 43: 1–22.

Demogue, René. 1923. Traité des obligations en général. T. I. Sources des obligations. Paris, Librairie Arthur Rousseau.

Demogue, René. 1925. Traité des obligations en général. T. 5. Paris, Librairie Arthur Rousseau. Diesse, François. 1999. Le devoir de coopération comme principe directeur du contrat. Archives de Philosophie Du Droit 43: 259–302.

Dionisi-Peyrusse, Amélie. 2008. Droit civil. T. 2. Les obligations. Paris, CNFPT.

Dombre, Jessica. 2011. L’obligation d’information dans les contrats de crédit à la consummation. Paris, Centre de droit de la consommation et du marche.

Dupont, Agnès. 2002. Le devoir de conseil en matiere de garanties. Paris, Universite Robert Schu- man.

El Gharbi, Mustafa, 1994. L’obligation d’information dans les contrats. Université Paris-Est Créteil Val de Marne.

Fabre-Magnan, Muriel. 2014. De l’obligation d’information dans les contrats. Essai d’une théorie. Paris, L.G.D.J.

Goubinat, Marine. 2016. Les principes directeurs du droit des contrats. Saint-Martin-d’Hères, Uni- versité Grenoble Alpes.

Goux, Catherine. 1999. L’erreur, le dol et la lésion qualifiée: analyse et comparaisons. Cahiers de la Faculté de droit de Namur 11: 13–58. Namur, FUNDP. Faculté de droit.

Loir, Romain. 2002. Les fondements de l’exigence de bonne foi en droit français des contrats. Ecole doctorale no. 74 — Lille 2.

Mahi-Disdet, Djamila. 2011. L’obligation d’information dans les contrats du commerce electronique. Université d’Avignon.

Maume, Florian. 2015. Essai critique sur la protection du consentement de la partie faible en matiere contractuelle. Thèse, dir. D. Houtcieff. Université d’Evry-Val-d’Essonne.

Mehanna, Myriam. 2014. La prise en compte de l’intérêt du cocontractant. Thèse de doctorat. Paris, École doctorale de droit privé.

Pontiroli, Luciano. 2017. Inside the Pandora’s vase. A critical assessment of some aspects of the re- form of French law of contract. Available at https://www.academia.edu/35397847/Inside_the_ Pandoras_Box_doc (accessed: 01.04.2021).

Pothier, Robert Joseph. 1762. Traité du contrat de vente, selon les règles tant du for de la con- science que du for extérieur. Paris, Debure l’aîné.

Rowan, Solene. 2017. The new French law of contract. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 66 (4): 805–831.

Rudokvas, Anton D. 2016. Infringement of duties of information: Pre-contractual liability, representa- tions, warranties and indemnity. Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiia Rossiiskoi Federatsii 11: 57–79. (In Russian)

Van Rossum, Madeleine. 2000. The duty of disclosure: Tendencies in French law, Dutch law and English law; criterions, differences and similarities between the legal systems. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 7 (3): 300–325.

Vigneau, Christophe. 2010. The obligation of good faith in France. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal 32: 593–602.

Villain, Adeline. 2013. L’immixtion du juge dans les contrats. Saint-Martin-d’Hères, Université Grenoble Alpes.

Viney, Geneviève, Ghestin, Jacques. 1982. Traité de droit civil. Vol. 4. La resposabilite. Paris, L.G.D.J. Von Bar, Christian, Clive, Eric. 2008. Principles, definitions and model rules of European private law. Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR) . Munich, European Law Publishing GmbH.

Published

02.12.2020

How to Cite

Lugmanov, R. R. (2020). Сivil law information obligations under French law. Pravovedenie, 64(2), 245–269. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu25.2020.203