Public policy clause in law and judicial practice of the People’s Republic of China
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu25.2021.405Abstract
The article presents an analysis of approaches to applying the public policy clause as a ground for refusing recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in Chinese judicial practice. The study also addresses issues related to the enforcement of “internal” arbitral awards in China. The choice of this legal order for the study is that the public policy clause appeared in Chinese law relatively recent. In addition, mainland China joined the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards of 1958 only in 1987, much later than the USSR. At first, Chinese courts, like those in Russia, had a poor understanding of how to interpret and apply the public policy clause, but later the situation changed for the better. Taking into account China’s significant role in international trade, it is important to find out in which situations Chinese courts recognize public policy violations. Apart from the legal acts of the People’s Republic of China that embody the public policy clause, the article also analyzes Chinese judicial practice. A few examples of the use of this clause in domestic disputes were also studied. Based on the results of the study, it is concluded that the Chinese judicial practice has already developed a restrictive and uniform approach to the interpretation of the content of public policy. Given that it is not yet possible to draw a similar conclusion in relation to Russian judicial practice, Russian law enforcement authorities could pay attention to the approaches of the Supreme People’s Court of the People’s Republic of China, in particular, to its consistent practice of distinguishing of public policy violation from other grounds for refusal to recognize and enforce foreign arbitral awards.
Keywords:
international commercial arbitration, Chinese law, Chinese judicial practice, public policy, public interests, reporting system
Downloads
References
Chilikov, Egor, Dvenadtsatova, Natalia. 2021. Commentary on the New York Convention 1958, Article V (2) (b). Recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in Russia and former USSR states, ed. by Roman O. Zykov: 93–106. The Netherlands, Kluwer Law International.
Hsi-Chia Chen, Helena. 2017. Predictability of “Public policy” in Article V of the New York Convention under Mainland China Judicial Practice. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
Hu, Yves, Wunschheim, Clarisse von. 2018. Reforms on the “Prior Reporting System” — A praiseworthy effort by the PRC Supreme People’s Court, or not? Kluwer Arbitration Blog. Available at: http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2018/01/08/reforms-prior-reporting-systempraiseworthy-effort-prc-supreme-peoples-court-not/?doing_wp_cron=1591232997.9072170 257568359375000 (accessed: 31.01.2021).
Karabelnikov, Boris R. 2008. Enforcement and challenging of international arbitral awards. Commentary on the 1958 New York Convention and Chapters 30 and 31 of the APC of the Russian Federation. Мoscow, Statut Publ. (In Russian)
Fei, Lanfang. 2010. Public policy as a bar to enforcement of international arbitral awards: A review of the Chinese approach. Arbitration International 26 (2): 301–312. Available at: https://www.kluwerarbitration.com/document/new-kli-ka-1021006-n?q=social%20and%20public%20interest (accessed: 23.01.2021).
Skvortsov, Oleg Yu. 2020. Conservative model of arbitration: The Russian experience. Indian Journal of Arbitration Law IX (1): 60–77. Available at: https://www.kluwerarbitration.com/document/kli-ka-ijal-9-1-004-n?q=A%20Conservative%20Model%20of%20Arbitration%3A%20The%20 Russian%20Experience (accessed: 06.05.2021).
Sun, Wei. 2020. How the Arbitration Law of the People’s Republic of China should be modernised? Kluwer Arbitration Blog. Available at: http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2020/07/31/how-the-arbitration-law-of-the-peoples-republic-of-china-should-be-modernised (accessed: 30.01.2021).
Wang, Brad, Bai, Xianyue. 2021. Award concerning bitcoin exchange — bit too risky to enforce? Kluwer Arbitration Blog. Available at: http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2021/04/02/award-concerning-bitcoin-exchange-bit-too-risky-to-enforce (accessed: 15.02.2021).
Zykov, Roman O. 2019. The statistical analysis of the application of the New York Convention in Russia. Kluwer Arbitration Blog. Available at: http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2019/02/04/the-statistical-analysis-of-the-application-of-the-new-york-convention-in-russia (accessed: 18.03.2021).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Articles of "Pravovedenie" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.
