Cross-Border Child Abduction: An Analysis of the Jurisprudence of Best Interests of Children in India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu25.2021.401Abstract
Intercountry child abduction cases present a colossal challenge for the courts in determining courses of action. The Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of Child Abduction, 1980, provides for the mechanism of prompt “return of the child” to the “habitual residence”. The assumption is that the courts of habitual residence of the child are the best forum to promote the child’s best interests. “Welfare of the child” or “best interest of the child” are the guiding principles recognized by international law as the basis for child jurisprudence. However, India is not a signatory to the Hague Convention, which poses a significant challenge to applying orders of foreign courts relating to the custody and return of a child abducted to India. Considering the large diaspora and increasing cross border marriages, the issue of child abduction and the legal response in India assumes significance. Indian courts have devised their own term, “intimate contact”, as the connecting factor in lieu of “habitual residence” to address legal battles in intercountry child abduction cases. This article explores the Indian stance on intercountry child abduction. The article provides a critical analysis of the application of the principle of welfare of the child by the Indian judiciary in child abduction cases. Jurisprudence reveals that Indian courts have assessed the contours of the best interest of the child not just from the point of the habitual residence of the child, but considering the overall interest of the child. However, in the absence of a legislative framework, uncertainty prevails. The paper argues that there is a need for comprehensive legislation to address issues and challenges of intercountry child abduction cases, taking into account factors like “domestic violence”, child psychology, and other social factors pertinent for the determination of the best interest of the child.
Keywords:
child abduction, welfare of the child, best interest of the child, intimate contact, Hague abduction convention
Downloads
References
Anand, Pinky. 2011. India. Family law: Jurisdictional comparisons, ed. by James Stewart: 181–200. London, Sweet and Maxwell Publ.
Appel, Anne E., Holden, George W. 1998. The co-occurrence of spouse and physical child abuse: A review and appraisal. Journal of Family Psychology 12 (4): 578–599.
Bala, Nicholas, Chamberland, Jacques. 2015. Family violence and proving “grave risk” for cases under the Hague Convention Article 13 (b). Draft background paper for the Working Group on a Guide to Good Practice on Article 13 (1) (b) of the Hague Convention on Child Abduction.
Queen’s University Legal Research Paper 2017-091, January 2015. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2987207 (accessed: 20.05.2021).
Beaumontand, Paul R., McEleavy, Peter E. 1999. The Hague Convention on International Child Abduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Browne, Noah L. 2011. Relevance and fairness: Protecting the rights of domestic-violence victims and left-behind fathers under the Hague Convention on International Child Abduction. Duke Law Journal 60: 1193–1238.
Bruch, Carol S. 2004. The unmet needs of domestic violence victims and their children in Hague Child Abduction Convention cases. Family Law Quarterly 38: 529–545.
Dasgupta, Shamita D. 2007. Exploring South Asian battered women’s use of force in intimate relationships. Manavi Occasional Paper Series 13: 1.
Edleson, Jeffrey L., Lindhorst, Taryn, Mehrotra, Gita, Vesneski, William, Lopez, Luz, Shetty, Sudha. 2010. Multiple perspectives on battered mothers and their children fleeing to the United States for safety: A study of Hague Convention Cases (Final Report National Institute for Justice), November 2010. Available at: https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/232624.pdf (accessed: 20.04.2022).
Estin, Ann L. 2017. Marriage and divorce conflicts in international perspective. Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law 27: 485–517.
Galanter, Marc, Krishnan, Jayanth. 2001. Personal law systems and religious conflict: A comparison
of India and Israel. Religion and personal law in secular India: A call to judgment, ed. by Gerald
J. Larson: 270–300. Bloomington, Indiana University Press.
Gupta, Moushumi Das. 2018. India may not sign Hague Convention on International Child Abduction.
Hindustan Times 19 June.
Jhambolkar, Laxmi. 2013. Conflict of laws. Fifty years of supreme court, ed. by Shashi Kant Verma Kusum: 650–681. India, Oxford University Press.
Jhambolkar, Laxmi. 2017. Domestic violence and the Hague Abduction Convention: the Indian perspective. Indian Journal of International Law 57 (1–2): 179–188.
Johnson, Thomas A. 2000. The Hague Child Abduction Convention: Diminishing returns and little to celebrate for Americans. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 33: 125–178.
Jolly, Stellina, Garimella, Sai Ramani. 2018. International parental child abduction and India — Attempting engagement with the Hague Convention. Australian Journal of Asian Law 19 (1): 1–20.
Jolly, Stellina. 2017. International parental child abduction and legal standards in India. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 31 (1): 20–40.
Jolly, Stellina, Sharma Aaditya V. 2021. Domestic violence and inter-country child abduction: An Indian judicial and legislative exploration. Journal of Private International Law 17 (1): 114–146.
Jolly, Stellina, Khanderia, Saloni. 2021. Indian private international law. London, Hart Publ.
Konno, Yoko. 2015. A haven for international child abduction: Will the Hague Convention shape Japanese family law? California Western International Law Journal 46: 39–68.
Loo, Hannah. 2016. In the child’s best interests: Examining international child abduction, adoption, and asylum. Chicago Journal of International Law 17 (2) (7): 609–636.
Malhotra, Anil. 2014. To return or not to return: Hague convention countries vs. non convention countries. Family Law Quarterly 48 (2): 297–318.
McKinney, Laura. 2006. International adoption and the Hague Convention: Does the implementation of the convention protect the best interests of children. Whittier Journal of Child and Family Advocacy 6: 361–412.
Misra, Neeta. 2016. International child abduction and domestic violence: Why children are sent back to violent homes. Business World.
Mulla, Dinshaw F., Desai, Satyajit A. 2013. Mulla principles of Hindu Law. New Delhi, Lexis Nexis, Butterworths.
Noronha, Elgar. 2010. Private international law in India: Adequacy of principles in comparison with common law and civil law systems. Allahabad, India, Universal Law Publ.
Parashar, Archana. 2003. Welfare of child in family laws — India and Australia. Nalsar Law Review 1 (1): 49–72.
Quillen, Brian. 2014. The new face of international child abduction: Domestic-violence victims and their treatment under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction. Texas International Law Journal 49: 621–643.
Rivers, Dana R. 1989. Hague International Child Abduction Convention and the International Child Abduction Remedies Act: Closing doors to the parent abductor. Transnational Lawer 2: 589–640.
Rossman, B. B. Robbie. 2001. Longer-term effects of children’s exposure to domestic violence. Domestic Violence in the Lives of Children: The Future of Research, Intervention, and Social Policy, eds Sandra A. Graham-Bermann, Jeffrey L. Edleson. 1st ed.: 35–65. American Psychological Association.
Schuz, Rhona. 2015. The Hague Child Abduction Convention: A critical analysis. London, Bloomsbury Publ.
Silberman, Linda. 2006. Interpreting the Hague Abduction Convention: In search of a global jurisprudence. New York University Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers 18 (1): 1–34.
Singh, Kirti. 2008. Child custody cases in the context of international migration. Marriage, Migration and Gender, eds Rajni Palriwala, Patricia Uberoi: 326–347. New Delhi, Sage Publ.
Sthoeger, Eran. 2011. International child abduction and children’s rights: Two means to the same end. Michigan Journal of International Law 32 (3): 511–526.
Subramanian, Narendra. 2010. Making family and nation: Hindu marriage law in early postcolonial India. The Journal of Asian Studies 69: 771–798.
Vivatvaraphol, Tai. 2009. Back to basics: Determining a child’s habitual residence in international child abduction cases under the Hague Convention. Fordham Law Review 77 (6): 3332–3369.
Wills, Melissa. 2006. Interpreting the Hague Convention on International Child Abduction: Why American courts need to reconcile the rights of non-custodial parents, the best interests of abducted children, and the underlying objectives of the Hague Convention. The Review of Litigation 25: 423–449.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Articles of "Pravovedenie" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.
