Functions of the civil law science

Authors

  • Sofia Y. Filippova Lomonosov Moscow State University

Abstract

The author considers arguments about the futility of legal science made by Y. von Kirchmann in 1848 and is trying to address them. The author considers that it is necessary to answer the question about the purpose of the civil law science and addresses the question about the objective of the study as a subjective view of a scientist on the expected research results and functions of science, as an objective reflection of the impact of this science on the world (law and society). The author conducts the analysis of changes in scientific result of the civil law studies during their development and distinguishes between the functions of a normal civil law science based on these results. The article shows the value of the functions for setting scientific problems, obtaining and evaluation of scientific results. The author considers ideological, educational, descriptive, explanatory, critical, creative, predictive, symbolic, and regulatory functions. The author comes to the conclusion that the ideological function was typical for the civil law science of the Soviet period and was no longer relevant in the 1970-s. The educational function has lost its relevance as well; it was manifested in the fact that modern works in the field of civil law rarely focus on the population, do not facilitate promotion of the Russian civil law and legislation, thus adversely affecting the public trust to the state. The author comes to the conclusion about the need to adopt measures to strengthen the educational function of the science. The author notes that the civil law science somehow performs the descriptive and explanatory functions throughout its development, however under modern conditions the description of law is automated. The critical function of the civil law science has been intensified in the anticipation of codification. Excessive increase of critical function adversely affects the legal consciousness (both ordinary and professional). In this regard, the article points out the negative consequences of a protracted period of modernization of the Civil code. The author is skeptical about the possibility of the civil law science to perform the creative function, that is, addressing changes into the legislation. The author shows the importance of the symbolic function suggesting that formulas and procedures convenient and understandable for private law agents can be expected as a scientific outcome. Special attention is paid to the regulatory function specific for the civil-law science. It consists in the establishment of codes of private law unification.

Keywords:

functions of the civil law science, civil law science, explanation of law, legal education, law description, civil law, ideology

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Sofia Y. Filippova, Lomonosov Moscow State University

candidate of legal sciences, associate professor

References

Agarkov M. M. Izbrannye trudy po grazhdanskomu pravu: v 2 t. [The Selected works on civil law]. Vol. I. Moscow, Center Jurinfor Publ., 2002. 490 p. (In Russian)

Aksakov I.S. Issledovanie o torgovle na ukrainskikh iarmarkakh [A Study of trade in the Ukrainian fairs]. St. Petersburg, 1858. 395 p. (In Russian)

Baranov V. M. Preambula normativnogo pravovogo akta [The preamble of a normaive legal act]. Moscow, Yurlitinform Publ., 2014. 248 p. (In Russian)

Belov V. A. Grazhdanskoe pravo: aktual’nye problemy teorii i praktiki [Civil law: actual problems of theory and practice]. Moscow, Yurayt-Izdat Publ., 2007. 993 p. (In Russian)

Belov V.A. Zanimatel’naia tsivilistika: v 3 t. Vyp.2. Ocherki po nebol’shim, no nebezynteresnym voprosam grazhdanskogo prava [Civil law: in 3 volumes Vol.2. Essays on small but interesting civil law issues]. Moscow, Center Jurinfor Publ., 2006. 191 p. (In Russian)

Filippova S.Yu. Instrumental’nyi podkhod v nauke chastnogo prava [Instrumental approach in the science of private law]. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2013. 350 p (In Russian)

Filippova S.Yu. Podpis’ kak simvol svobodnogo voleiz”iavleniia i sredstvo identifikatsii sub”ektov grazhdanskogo oborota [Signature as a symbol of free expression and a means of identification of subjects of civil law]. Khoziaistvo i pravo [Economy and law], 2017, no. 1, pp. 54–72. (In Russian)

Filippova S.Yu. Tsivilisticheskaia nauka Rossii: stanovlenie, funktsii, metodologiia [Civil law science in Russia: the establishment, functions, methodology]. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2017. 384 p. (In Russian)

Gavrilov O. A. Strategiia pravotvorchestva i sotsial’noe prognozirovanie [Strategy of law-making and social forecasting]. Moscow, Institute of state and law Russian Academy of Sciences Publ., 1993. 128 p. (In Russian)

Grave K. A., Parchment A. I., Maltzman T. B. Grazhdanskoe pravo [Civil law]. 2nd ed. Moscow:State publishing house of legal literature, 1950. 264 p. (In Russian)

Grodzynskyi M. K voprosu o iuridicheskikh posobiiakh [The question about the legal benefits]. Ezhenedel’nik sovetskoi iustitsii [Weekly of the Soviet justice], 1922, no. 14–15, pp. 7–8. (In Russian)

Gulakov I. Sud i zakonnost’ v khudozhestvennoi literature [The Court of law in literature]. Sotsialisticheskaia zakonnost’ [Socialist legality], 1949, no. 3, pp. 26–34; no. 4, pp.32–39; no.7, pp.32–36; no.9, pp.34–39; no.11, pp.24–32. (In Russian)

Halfina R. O. Kriterii istinnosti v pravovoi nauke [Criterion of truth in legal science]. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo [Soviet state and law]. 1974, no. 9, pp. 20–28. (In Russian)

Ioffe O. S. Grazhdanskoe pravo: izbrannye trudy [Civil law: selected works]. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2003. 784 p. (In Russian)

Ioffe O. S. Izbrannye trudy po grazhdanskomu pravu: iz istorii tsivilisticheskoi mysli [Selected works on civil law]. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2000. 777 p. (In Russian)

Istoriia i metodologiia iuridicheskoi nauki: uchebnik dlia vuzov [History and methodology of legal science: the textbook for high schools]. Eds. Yu.A.Denisova, I. L. Chestnov. St. Petersburg, Ivesep Publ., 2014. 564 p. (In Russian)

Ivanov A.A. Problema primitivizatsii grazhdanskogo prava Rossii [The Problem of primitivism civil law in Russia]. Zakon [The Law], 2015, no. 5, pp. 58–64. (In Russian)

Kantorovich Ja. A. Osnovnye idei grazhdanskogo prava [The Basic ideas of civil law]. Moscow, Jurinfor-MSU Publ., 2009. 504 p. (In Russian)

Karapetov A.G. Ekonomicheskii analiz prava [Economic analysis of law]. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2016. 528 p. (In Russian)

Koblikov A. Vospitanie kommunisticheskoi ideinosti u budushchikh iuristov [The Education of Communist ideology of the future lawyers]. Sovetskaia iustitsiia [Soviet justice], 1979, no. 14, pp. 10–11. (In Russian)

Kolibab K.E. Izdanie Sobraniia deistvuiushchego zakonodatel’stva SSSR [Edition Collection of the current legislation of the USSR]. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo [Soviet state and law], 1974, no. 8, pp. 3–9. (In Russian)

Kommercheskoe pravo Rossii: uchebnik dlia akademicheskogo bakalavriata [Commercial law of Russia: textbook for academic bachelor]. Eds. B. I. Puginsky, V. A. Belov, E. A. Abrosimova. Moscow, Yurayt Publ., 2016. 471 p. (In Russian)

Krasavchikov O. A. Kategorii nauki grazhdanskogo prava: v 2 t. [Science of civil law]. Vol. 1. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2005. 494 p. (In Russian)

Kun T. Struktura nauchnykh revoliutsii [The Structure of scientific revolutions]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1977. 300 p. (In Russian)

Kun T. Posle «Struktury nauchnykh revoliutsii» [After “the structure of scientific revolutions”]. Moscow, AST, Kharvest Publ., 2014. 510 p. (In Russian)

Lakatos I. Metodologiia issledovatel’skikh programm [The Methodology of research programmes]. Moscow, Ermak, AST Publ., 2003. 384 p. (In Russian)

Lapach V. A. Sistema ob”ektov grazhdanskikh prav [System of objects of civil rights]. St. Petersburg, Law Centre “Press”, 2002. 544 p. (In Russian)

Meyer D. Iuridicheskie issledovaniia otnositel’no torgovogo byta Odessy [Legal research in relation to the trade life of Odessa]. Kazan, At the expense of the bookseller I. Dubrovin, 1853, 46 p. (In Russian)

Pahman S.V. Obychnoe grazhdanskoe parvo v Rossii: v 2 t.[Usual civil law in Russia]. Vol. 1. Moscow, 1877; Vol. 2. Moscow, 1879. (In Russian)

Pashukanis E. Osnovnye problemy marksistskoi teorii prava i gosudarstva [The Basic problems of the Marxist theory of state and law]. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i revoliutsiia prava [Soviet state and revolution of law], 1931, no.1, p.21. (In Russian)

Pashukanis E. Vynuzhdennyi otvet [Forced response]. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i revoliutsiia prava [The Soviet state and revolution of law], 1931, no.5–6, pp.98–102. (In Russian)

Podoltsev V. O khaotichnom sostoianii nashego zakonodatel’stva (trudnosti otyskannaia zakonov) [About the chaotic state of our laws (challenges found the act)]. Sudebnaia gazeta [Forensic newspaper], 1891, no. 1, p. 5. (In Russian)

Ponomarenko E. V. Sovremennaia nauka teorii prava: tsel’, printsipy, zadachi i funktsii [The Modern science theory of law: goal, principles, tasks and functions]. Sovremennoe pravo [Modern law], 2015, no. 9, pp. 11–15. (In Russian)

Popper K. R. Ob”ektivnoe znanie. Evoliutsionnyi podkhod [Objective knowledge. An evolutionary approach]. Moscow, editorial URSS, 2002. 384 p. (In Russian)

Pravovoi monitoring: aktual’nye problemy teorii i praktiki [Legal monitoring: actual problems of theory and practice]. Ed. N. N. Chernogor. Moscow, international law Institute Publ., 2010. 232 p. (In Russian)

Puginsky B.I., Safiullin D.N. Pravovaia ekonomika: problemy stanovleniia [The legal economy: problems of formation]. Moscow, Legal literature Publ., 1991. 240 p. (In Russian)

Rodionov V. Organizatsiia pravovoi propagandy i pravovogo vospitaniia [The Organization of legal advocacy and legal education]. Sovetskaia iustitsiia [Soviet justice], 1979, no. 8, pp. 3–5. (In Russian)

Ruzavin G. I. Filosofiia nauki: ucheb. posobie [State restoration Institute Philosophy of science: proc. allowance]. Moscow, YUNITI-DANA Publ., 2008. 182 p. (In Russian)

Savelyev A.A. Krest’ianskie iuridicheskie obychai v kuznechnom promysle Nizhegorodskogo povolzh’ia [Peasant practice in the blacksmith crafts of the Nizhny Novgorod Volga region]. Iuridicheskii vestnik [Legal Gazette], 1883, no. 6–7, pp. 499–531. (In Russian)

Sazhin I. Nuzhna ideologiia zakonnosti [Need an ideology of law]. Sovetskaia iustitsiia [Soviet justice], 1991, no. 10. (In Russian)

Sergeevich V.I. Zadacha i metoda gosudarstvennykh nauk [Problem and method of Economics]. Moscow, Librokom Publ., 2011. 240 p. (In Russian)

Shershenevich G.F. Zadachi i metody grazhdanskogo pravovedeniia [Tasks and techniques of the civil law]. Kazan, Tipo-lithography of the Imperial University, 1898. 46 p. (In Russian)

Shirvindt A. M. Rezhim soglashenii ob otvetstvennosti za narushenie obiazatel’stv v negosudarstvennykh svodakh grazhdanskogo prava [Mode of agreements on liability for breach of obligations in the private vaults of civil law]. [Bulletin of civil law], 2014, no.1, pp. 74–126. (In Russian)

Stanislavsky A. G. O khode zakonovedeniia v Rossii [On the progress of jurisprudence in Russia]. St. Petersburg, 1853. 112 p. (In Russian)

Stanislavsky A. G. Ob aktakh ukrepleniia prav na imushchestvo [Acts of strengthening property rights]. Kazan, 1842. (In Russian)

Stuchka P. Moi put’ i moi oshibki [My path and my mistakes]. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i revoliutsiia prava [Soviet state and revolution of law], 1931, no.5–6, pp.67–97. (In Russian)

Syrykh V.M. Sotsiologiia prava [Sociology of law]. Moscow, Justice Publ., 2016. 472 p (In Russian)

Tikhomirov Yu.A. Prognozy i riski v pravovoi sfere [Outlook and risks in the legal sphere]. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava [Journal of Russian law], 2014, no.3, pp.5–16. (In Russian)

Tomsinov V. A. Poniatie iuridicheskoi nauki i ee rol’ v razvitii i funktsionirovanii prava [The Concept of legal science and its role in the development and functioning of law]. Gosudarstvo i pravo [State and law], 2016, no. 4, pp. 10–13. (In Russian)

Tomsinov V.A. Razrabotka proekta Grazhdanskogo ulozheniia i razvitie nauki grazhdanskogo prava v Rossii v kontse XIX — nachale XX v. Stat’ia pervaia [Development of the draft Civil code and the development of science of civil law in Russia in the late XIX — early XX century]. Zakonodatel’stvo [Legislation], 2015, no. 2, pp. 88–94. (In Russian)

Yurtaeva E.A. Zakonovedenie i zakonovedy: o iurisprudentsii i ee deiateliakh v dorevoliutsionnoi Rossii [Jurisprudence and lawyers: the law and its figures in pre- revolutionary Russia]. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava [Journal of Russian law], 2012, no.2, pp. 86–99. (In Russian)

Zakharov V.G. Obraz sovetskogo iurista v populiarnoi literature [The Image of a Soviet lawyer in popular literature]. Izvestiia vuzov. Pravovedenie, 1983, no. 5, pp. 112–113. (In Russian)

Zykin I.S. [The question of the relationship between proprietary and contractual statuses]. Grazhdanskoe pravo sovremennoi Rossii [Civil law of modern Russia]. Eds. O. M. Kozyr, A. L. Makovsky. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2008, pp. 45–57. (In Russian)

Published

01.08.2017

How to Cite

Filippova, S. Y. (2017). Functions of the civil law science . Pravovedenie, 61(4), 102–136. Retrieved from https://pravovedenie.spbu.ru/article/view/6789

Issue

Section

Private law