Традиционная шотландская модель уголовного права с дальневосточной точки зрения
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu25.2023.103Аннотация
Традиционная шотландская модель уголовного права была смелой попыткой построить систему уголовного права на христианских основах в сочетании с универсальными принципами разума, выходящими за рамки узких национальных, культурных и религиозных традиций конкретной страны. Шотландское уголовное право выросло из эпохи Просвещения, представители которой пытались попыталась основать уголовное право на здра вом смысле, сделать его понятным и полезным. Дух шотландской правовой философии эгалитарен. Знание права должно быть доступно каждому. Эти идеи бросают вызов практике многих стран Востока, где право воспринимается как сложный набор правил, известных только узкому кругу экспертов, в то время как люди играют незначительную роль, но подчиняются этим правилам, часто не понимая их или даже не зная о них. Шотландские идеи уголовного права могут послужить платформой для критического изучения уголовного права в таких разных странах, как Таиланд и Китай. Привлекательной чертой шотландского Просвещения для этих стран является его прагматизм. В то же время она сопротивляется чрезмерности государственного контроля с помощью уголовного права, которое может угрожать благополучию людей. Представление о преступлении как о моральном пороке, оскорбляющем общественные чувства, эффективно ограничивает репрессивную экспансию уголовного права на Дальнем Востоке.
Ключевые слова:
уголовное право, шотландское Просвещение, коммуникативная теория, Таиланд, Китай
Скачивания
Библиографические ссылки
Alison, Archibald. 1832. Principles of the Criminal Law of Scotland. W. Blackwood.
Allison, Stephen. 2012. Stair, natural law and Scotland. Law & Justice — The Christian Law Review 169: 189–209
Bayne, Alexander. 1730. Institutions of the criminal law of Scotland. Edinburgh.
Beales, Derek. 2005. Enlightenment and reform in eighteenth-century Europe. London, IB Tauris.
Bell, Daniel A. 2006. Beyond Liberal Democracy: Political Thinking for an East Asian Context. Princeton University Press.
Biddulph, Sarah. 2015. The Stability Imperative: Human Rights and Law in China. Vancouver, UBC Press.
Broadie, Alexander. 2003. The Cambridge companion to the Scottish Enlightenment. Cambridge University Press.
Cairns, John W. 2003. Legal theory. The Cambridge companion to the Scottish Enlightenment, ed. by A. Broadie: 222–242. Cambridge University Press.
Calvin, John. 1813. Institutes of Christian religion. Philadelphia, Presbyterian Board of Publications.
Carvalho, Henrique. 2017. The preventive turn in criminal law. Oxford University Press.
Chen I-Hsin, 2016. From God’s Chinese names to a cross-cultural universal God: James Legge’s intertextual theology in his translation of Tian, Di and Shangdi. Translation Studies 9 (3): 268–281.
Chen, Jianfu. 2008. Chinese law: Context and transformation. Leiden, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Cheng, Chi-Yu. 1948. The Chinese theory of criminal law. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 39: 461–470.
Chitov, Alexandre. 2018. Natural Law, criminalization and extraterritorial jurisdiction in Thailand and China: a comparative law perspective. MFU Connexion: Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences 7.1: 233–260.
Chitov, Alexandre. 2021. The legal hurdles to cooperation between Thailand and China in suppressing illegal trade in endangered species. Thammasat Law Journal, 50.2.: 222–240.
Chuan Feng, Nelson, Leyton. Simon, Thomas W. 2016. China’s Changing Legal System. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.
Day, Kristen. 2016. China’s environment and the challenge of sustainable development. London, Routledge.
Duff, Antony, Green, Stuart (eds). 2013. Philosophical foundations of criminal law. Oxford University Press.
Duff, Antony. 2013. Theories of criminal law. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/criminal-law/ (accessed: 08.05.2022).
Duff, Antony. 2017. Legal punishment. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/legal-punishment/#PunCom (accessed: 08.05.2022).
Duff, Antony. 2001. Punishment, communication, and community. Oxford University Press. Dupre, Louis. 2004. The Enlightenment and the intellectual foundations of modern culture. Yale University Press.
Erskine, John. 1881. Principles of the law of Scotland. Edinburgh, Bell & Brandfute.
Farmer, Lindsay. 1997. Criminal law, tradition and legal order: Crime and the genius of Scots law, 1747 to the present. Cambridge University Press.
Ferguson, Adam. 1792. Principles of moral and political science. Edinburgh, W Creech.
Forbes, William. 1730. The institutes of the law of Scotland. Edinburgh, J. Mosman.
Ford, John D. 2007. Law and opinion in Scotland during the seventeenth century. Hart Publishing.
Gaskin, John. 1988. Hume’s philosophy of religion. Houndmills, MacMillan Press.
Greer, Steven, Lim, Tiong Piow. 1998. Confucianism: natural law Chinese style? Ratio Juris 11 (1): 80–89.
Grotius, Hugo. 1625. De Jure Belli ac Pacis. Available at: https://oll.libertyfund.org/title/grotius-therights-of-war-and-peace-2005-ed-3-vols (accessed on 08.05.2022).
Harding, Andrew, Pongsapan, Munin (eds). 2021. Thai Legal History: From Traditional to Modern Law. Cambridge University Press.
Haakonssen, Knud (ed.). 2006. The Cambridge companion to Adam Smith. Cambridge University Press.
Hongladarom, Soraj. 2006. Love in the age of high technology: how are Metta and Karuna still possible? Prajna Vihara 7 (2). Available at: http://its-3.au.edu/open_journal/index.php/PrajnaVihara/article/view/1145 (accessed: 08.05.2022).
Hume, David. 1739. A treatise of human nature. London, John Noon.
Hume, David. 1987. Essays political, moral, and literary. Indianapolis, Liberty Classics.
Kennedy, C. 2012. Criminal law and religion in post-reformation Scotland. Edinburgh Law Review 16 (2): 178–197.
Lee, Ambrose. 2017. Defending a communicative theory of punishment: the relationship between hard treatment and amends. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 37 (1): 217–237.
Legge, James. 1865. The Chinese Classics, volume III: the Shoo King or the Book of Historical Documents. London: Trubner.; rpt. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 1960.
Lehmann, William C. 1971. Henry Home, Lord Kames, and the Scottish Enlightenment: A Study in National Character and in the History of Ideas. Dordrecht, Springer.
Loy, David. 2000. How to reform a serial killer: the Buddhist approach to restorative justice. Journal of Buddhist Ethics 7: 145–168.
Luo, Guanzhong, Roberts, Moss. 1991. Three kingdoms: A historical novel. Berkeley; Beijing: University of California Press; Foreign Languages Press.
Macpherson, Crowford B. 1977. The life and times of liberal democracy. Oxford University Press.
NIV Bible. 2011. Available at: https://www.biblegateway.com/versions/New-International-VersionNIV-Bible/ (accessed: 08.05.2022).
Schinkel, Marguerite. (2014). Punishment as moral communication: The experiences of long-term prisoners. Punishment & Society 16(5): 578–597.
Shytov, Alexander. 2016. Environmental crime and communication to the public in China. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 22(1): 57–75.
Smith, Adam 1759. Theory of moral sentiments. London, Henry G. Bohn.
Smith, Adam. 1763. Lectures on jurisprudence. Oxford, Clarendon Press.
Sobel, Jordan Howard. 2011. Walls and vaults: a natural science of morals (Virtue ethics according to David Hume). Hoboken John, Wiley & Sons.
Stair, James Dalrymple. 1681. The institutions of the law of Scotland. Edinburgh. Available at: http://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/eebo/A61249.0001.001?rgn=main;view=fulltext (accessed: 08.05.2017).
Surprenant, Chris W. (ed.). 2018. Rethinking punishment in the era of mass incarceration. New York, Routledge.
Swain, Tony. 2017. Confucianism in China: An introduction. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Tan, Alan Khee-Jin. 2004. Environmental laws and institutions in Southeast Asia: A review of recent developments. Singapore Year Book of International Law 8: 179–181.
Thomas Aquinas. Summa Theologiae. Available at: https://www.newadvent.org/summa/ (accessed: 08.05.2022).
Uwanno, Borwornsak. 2008. Ten principles of a righteous king and the king of Thailand. Nonthaburi: King Prajadhipok’s Institute.
Van Rooij, Benjamin. 2006. Implementation of Chinese environmental law: regular enforcement and political campaigns. Development and Change 37 (1): 57–74.
Veitch, Scott. 2006. Judgment and calling to account: truths, trials and reconciliations. The Trial on Trial. Volume 2: Judgment and calling to account, eds A. Duff, L. Farmer, S. Marshall, V. Tadros. Oxford, Hart: 155–171.
Veitch, Scott. 2017. The sense of obligation. Jurisprudence 8:3, 415–434.
Werner, Hans Keller, Zhang Xia. 2017. Functions of law in the sustainable development of China and a model for environmental legislation. European Business Review, 29 (4): 440–456. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-05-2016-0062
Xiaoying, Ma, Ortolano, Leonard. 2000. Environmental regulation in China: Institutions, enforcement, and compliance. Oxford, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Xin, Ren. 1997. Tradition of the Law and Law of the Tradition: Law, State, and Social Control in China. Westport, Greenwood Press.
Ying, Ji. 2021. The Making of Chinese Criminal Law. London, Routledge.
Yu, Mou. 2020. The Construction of Guilt in China: An Empirical Account of Routine Chinese Injustice. Oxford, Bloomsbury Publishing.
Zhang, Jinfan. 2014. The Tradition and Modern Transition of Chinese Law. Berlin, Springer.
Загрузки
Опубликован
Как цитировать
Выпуск
Раздел
Лицензия
Статьи журнала «Правоведение» находятся в открытом доступе и распространяются в соответствии с условиями Лицензионного Договора с Санкт-Петербургским государственным университетом, который бесплатно предоставляет авторам неограниченное распространение и самостоятельное архивирование.
