Догматическое и политико-правовое обоснование вещных обязательств
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu25.2020.303Аннотация
Развитие российского гражданского права демонстрирует, что отечественному праву не чужд такой институт общей теории гражданского права, как вещные обязательства (реальные, propter rem). Отдельные нормы федеральных законов и практика Верховного суда РФ последних лет подтверждают указанный вывод, а также дают основание предположить, что в российском праве появляется все больше примеров вещных обязательств. Между тем обособление их в российском праве небесспорно и подвергается сомнению в научных кругах. Ставя вопрос о допустимости существования вещных обязательств, автор статьи последовательно разбирает догматические и политико-правовые аргументы, опровержение которых позволяет найти место вещных обязательств в системе российского гражданского права. В начале исследования автор обращается к догматическому обоснованию вещных обязательств. Изучается влияние системы построения вещных прав в России, принципов numerus clausus и numerus apertus, а также свойства следования права и принципа относительности договора на возможность выделения в отечественном праве вещных обязательств. Во второй части статьи предпринимается попытка политико-правового обоснования вещных обязательств. Сравниваются правовые потенциалы, которые предоставляет использование в гражданском обороте вещных обязательств, с одной стороны, и ограниченных вещных прав (на примере сервитутов), легальных ограничений права собственности и социальных норм (норм добрососедства) — с другой. В заключении автор обобщает сделанные в статье выводы и отмечает, что российское частное право не содержит серьезных догматических и политико-правовых препятствий для существования вещных обязательств в отечественном правопорядке.
Ключевые слова:
вещные (реальные) обязательства, обязательства propter rem, сервитуты, соседское право, вещное право, свойство следования, numerus clausus, обязательства
Скачивания
Данные скачивания пока недоступны.
Библиографические ссылки
Agarkov, Mikhail M. 1940. Obligation under Soviet civil law . Moscow, NKIu SSSR Publ. (In Russian)
Akkermans, Bram. 2006. The new Dutch Civil Code: The borderline between property and contract. Towards a unified system of land burdens? , eds Sjef van Erp, Bram Akkermans: 163–183. Antwerpen, Oxford, Intersentia.
Akkermans, Bram. 2008. The principle of numerus clausus in European property law . Antwerpen, Oxford, Intersentia.
Akkermans, Bram. 2010. Concurrence of ownership and limited property rights. European Review of Private Law 2 (2): 259–284.
Annenkov, Konstantin. 1895. The system of Russian civil law . In 6 vols, vol. 2. St. Petersburg. Tipografiia M. M. Stasiulevicha. (In Russian)
Aron, Raymond. 1992. Main currents in sociological thought . Moscow, Politika Publ. (In Russian)
Artemov, Nikolai M., Kornev Aleksandr D. 2019. Financial and legal regulation of parafiscal payments in the Russian Federation . Moscow, Prospekt Publ. (In Russian)
Bevzenko, Roman S. 2012. Accessory nature of security obligations: European legal tradition and Russian practice. Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava 5: 4–36. (In Russian)
Borda, Guillermo. 1998. Tratado de Derecho Civil — Obligaciones . In 12 vols, vol. 1. Buenos Aires, Abeledo-Perrot.
Born, Garry B. 2014. International commercial arbitration . In 3 vols. vol. I: International Arbitration Agreements. Alphenaanden Rijn, Kluwer Law International.
Cashin Ritaine, Eleanor. 2011. National report on the transfer of movables in France. National reports on the transfer of movables in Europe . In 6 vols. Vol. 4: France, Belgium, Bulgaria, Poland, Portugal, eds Wolfgand Faber, Brigitta Lurger: 1–188. Munich, Otto Schmidt / De Gruyter European law publishers.
Cauffman, Caroline, Sagaert, Vincent 2011. National report on the transfer of movables in Belgium. National reports on the transfer of movables in Europe . In 6 vols. Vol. 4: France, Belgium, Bulgaria, Poland, Portugal, eds Wolfgand Faber, Brigitta Lurger: 189–352. Munich, Otto Schmidt / De Gruyter European law publishers.
Coase, Ronald H. 1990. The firm, the market, and the law . Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.
Demeyere, Siel. 2017. Affirmative land burdens in German, Dutch and Belgian law: Possibilities restrictions and workarounds. European Property Law Journal 6 (2): 196–235. https://doi.org/10.1515/eplj-2017-0010.
Dozhdev, Dmitry V. 2016. By the very idea of real law, we overcome our dependence on material things. Zakon 6: 6–19. (In Russian)
Dozhdev, Dmitry V. 2019. Presentation at St. Petersburg State University at the round table “The fate of proprietary rights to another’s property when the owner changes through the original method of acquisition” . Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k8KCeImUoWg [55:10–55:25] (accessed: 30.11.2019). (In Russian)
El’iashevich, Vasilii B. 1913. An outline of the development of forms of land turnover in the West. St.Petersburg, Pravda Publ. (In Russian)
Ellikson, Robert Ch. 2017. Order without law: How neighbors settle disputes. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo Instituta Gaidara Publ. (In Russian)
Emel’kina, Irina A. 2011. The system of limited property rights to a land plot. Moscow, Infotropic Publ. (In Russian)
Emel’kina, Irina A. 2016. The institution of restriction of property rights in favor of neighbors (neighbor’s law) in Russian law and in certain European countries. Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava 2: 79–112. (In Russian)
Erp, van Sjef, Akkermans, Bram (eds). 2012. Cases, materials and text on property law. Oxford, Hart Publ.
Erp, van Sjef. 2005. Surety agreements and the principle of accessority — personal security in the lights of a European property law principle. European Review of Private Law 3: 309–331.
Erp, van Sjef. 2006. Servitudes: The Borderline Between Contract and (Virtual) Property. Towards a unified system of land burdens? eds Sjef van Erp, Bram Akkermans: 1–10. Antwerpen, Oxford, Intersentia.
Freitag-Loringoven, Alexander L. 1914. Substantive law of the Patrimonial Statute Draft. In 2 vols, vol. 1. Iur’ev, Tipografiia K. Mattisena Publ. (In Russian)
Goronovich, Ivan. 1883. Research on easements. St. Petersburg, Tipografiia Pravitel’stvuiushchego Senata. (In Russian)
Guliaev, Aleksei M. 1907. Russian civil law. Kiev, Tipografia Gubernskogo Pravleniia. (In Russian)
Hinteregger, Monika. 2006. Servitudes — The Austrian concept. Towards a unified system of land burdens? , eds Sjef van Erp, Bram Akkermans: 21–30. Antwerpen, Oxford, Intersentia.
Huebner, Rudolf A. 1918. History of Germanic private law. Boston, Little, Brow, and Company.
Ivanov, Anton A. 2018. Property law is not a toy. Zakon 12: 18–26. (In Russian)
Karapetov, Artem G. 2011. The struggle for the recognition of judicial law-making in European and American law. Moscow, Statut Publ. (In Russian)
Kasso, Lev A. 1906. Russian land law. Moscow, Knizhnyi magazin I. K. Golubeva Publ. (In Russian)
Khaskel’berg, Boris L. 2004. The legal relationship from the testamentary refusal and its elements. Tsivilisticheskie issledovaniia. Iss. 1: Sbornik nauchnykh trudov pamiati professora I. N. Fedorova, eds Boris L. Khaskel’berg, Daniil O. Tuzov: 78–110. Moscow, Statut Publ. (In Russian)
Kofanov, Leonid L., Tomsinov, Vladimir A., eds. 1998. Institutes of Justinian. Moscow, Zertsalo Publ. (In Russian)
Kozlova, Natalia V., Pankratov, Pavel A. 1999. At the origins of Russian civil law. Meier, Dmitri I. Russkoe grazhdanskoe pravo. In 2 parts, part 1: 4–8. Moscow, Statut Publ. (In Russian)
Krasnova, Tatiana S. 2015. Easement types of restriction (encumbrance) of real estate rights: Foreign experience and novelties of Russian legislation. Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiiaRF 1: 142–160. (In Russian)
Krasnova, Tatiana S. 2017. Comments on the Review of judicial practice in cases on the establishment of an easement on a land plot, approved by the Presidium VS RF 26.04.2017. Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiia RF 7: 157–176. (In Russian)
Krasnova, Tatiana S. 2017. Compulsion and autonomy of the will in easement law. PhD diss., St. Petersburg State University. (In Russian)
Kurdinovskii, Viktor I. 1899. On the doctrine of legal restrictions on property rights. Odessa, Ekonomicheskaia tipografiia Publ. (In Russian)
Makovskii, Alexander L. On the codification of civil law (1922–2006). Moscow. Statut Publ. (In Russian)
Maleina, Marina N. 2008. Private easement agreement. Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava 4: 80–95. (In Russian)
Medvedev, Ivan R. 2017. Fueling urban conflict. Moscow, Infotropik Media Publ. (In Russian)
Meier, Dmitri I. 1999. Russian civil law. In 2 pts, part 2. Moscow, Statut Publ. (In Russian)
Monakhov, Daniil A. 2012. On the need to return negative easements to the Russian legislation. Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava 1: 50–71. (In Russian)
Movchanovskii, Boris F. 1923. The right of development (practical commentary to the articles 71–84 Civil Code) . Moscow, Izdatel’stvo Vserossiiskogo Komiteta pomoshchi invalidam voiny Publ. (In Russian)
Musin, Valerii A. 2014. Arbitration clause in a foreign trade contract and the problem of succession. Musin, Valerii A. Izbrannoe: 71–79. St. Petersburg, Treteiskii sud Publ.; Moscow, Statut Publ. (In Russian)
Novitskii, Ivan B. 1924. Neighborhood law. Pravo i zhizn’ 7–8: 10–21. (In Russian)
Novitskii, Ivan B., Pereterski, Ivan S. (eds). 2012. Roman private Law: a textbook. Moscow, Zertsalo-M Publ. (In Russian)
Pisuliński J., Zaradkiewicz K. 2011. National report on the transfer of movables in Poland. National reports on the transfer of movables in Europe. In 6 vols. Vol. 4: France, Belgium, Bulgaria, Poland, Portugal, eds Wolfgand Faber, Brigitta Lurger: 467–580. Munich, Otto Schmidt / De Gruyter European law publishers.
Pobedonostsev, Konstantin P. 2002. Civil law course: Patrimonial rights. Part 1. Moscow, Statut Publ. (In Russian)
Pokrovskii, Iosif A. 1896. Desirable setting of civil law in the study and teaching. Kiev, Tipografiia Imperatorskogo universiteta sviatogo Vladimira Publ. (In Russian)
Popov, Boris V. 1914. The right to participate in private and new law on the right to build up. Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava 3: 36–55. (In Russian)
Reid, Ken. 2006. Modernising land burden: The New Law in Scotland. Towards a unified system of land burdens? , eds Sjef van Erp, Bram Akkermans: 63–108. Antwerpen, Oxford, Intersentia.
Ross, Hugh L. 1980. Settled out of court: The social process of insurance claims adjustment. London, New York, Routledge.
Rudokvas, Anton D. 2004. On continuous, open and bona fide long-standing ownership. Tsivilisticheskie issledovaniia. Iss. 1: Sbornik nauchnykh trudov pamiati professora I. N. Fedorova, eds Boris L. Khaskel’berg, Daniil O. Tuzov: 148–187. Moscow, Statut Publ. (In Russian)
Rudokvas, Anton. 2009. Private easements in Russian civil law. Vestnik Vysshego arbitrazhnogo suda RF 4: 186–205. (In Russian)
Rybalov, Andrei O. 2007. Problems of classificationsin civil law relations. PhD Thesis in Law., St. Petersburg State University. (In Russian)
Rybalov, Andrei O. 2011. About the easement of light in Russian law. Vestnik Vysshego arbitrazhnogo suda RF 5: 6–11. (In Russian)
Rybalov, Andrei O. 2013. Some issues of property rights. Vestnik Vysshego arbitrazhnogo suda RF 12: 62–70. (In Russian)
Rybalov, Andrei O. 2017. The right of ownership (commentary to the article 209 of Russian Civil Code). Moscow, M-Logos Publ. Available at: http://m-lawbooks.ru/index.php/product/a-o- ryibalov-pravo-sobstvennosti-kommentariy-k-st-209-gk-rf (accessed: 20.09.2021). (In Russian)
Rybalov, Andrei O. 2018. Iura in re: numerus clausus vs numerus apertus. Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiia RF 7: 144–162. (In Russian)
Rybalov, Andrei O. Russian property law today. Zakon.ru. Available at: https://zakon.ru/blog/2019/2/22/ rossijskoe_veschnoe_pravo_segodnyalekciya (accessed: 30.11.2019). (In Russian)
Sagaert, Vincent. 2004. Real rights and real obligations in Belgian and French law. The content of real rights, Ars notaries, eds Michael Milo, Steven Bartels: 47–70. Deventer, Kluwer Rechtswetenschappen.
Sagaert, Vincent. 2006. The fragmentation of land burdens in French and Belgian law. Towards a unified system of land burdens? , eds Sjef van Erp, Bram Akkermans: 31–52. Antwerpen, Ox- ford, Intersentia.
Sarbash, Sergey. 2018. Is the third party (beneficiary) covered by a third party (arbitration) clause? Available at: https://zakon.ru/discussion/2018/02/21/svyazano_li_trete_lico_vygodoprio- bretatel_tretejskoj_arbitrazhnoj_ogovorkoj (accessed: 23.11.2019). (In Russian)
Savenkov, Aleksei V. 2019. Real possessions-today or tomorrow? Zakon 2: 89–95. (In Russian)
Savenkov, Aleksei. V. 2020. The concept and attributes of the property obligation in Russian law. Peterburgskaia tsivilistika 2.1: sb. rabot vypusknikov kafedry grazhdanskogo prava Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, comp. and ed. by Andrey. A. Pavlov: 212–231. Moscow, Statut Publ. (In Russian)
Scott, Samuel P. 1932. The Civil Law. In 17 vols, vol. 2. Cincinnati, Central Trust Company.
Shelomentseva, Elena A. 2015. Reducing the actessorship of security services in the comparative legal aspect. Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava 3: 57–105. (In Russian)
Sinaiskii, Vasilii I. 2002. Russian civil law. Moscow, Statut Publ. (In Russian)
Siubaeva, Iulia D. 2018. Civil law regulation of the restriction of the right of ownership of a land plot in the interest of a neighbor (neighbor’s law) . PhD Thesis in Law, Mordovskii gosudarstvennyi universitet. (In Russian)
Sukhanov, Evgeny A. 2017. Property law: A scientific and educational essay. Moscow, Statut Publ. (In Russian)
Vas’kovskii, Evgeny V. 2003. Civil law textbook. Moscow, Statut Publ. (In Russian)
Windscheid, Bernhard. 1874. Lehrbuch des Pandektenrechts. Vol. 1. Rus. ed. St. Petersburg, Gieroglifov i Nikiforov Publ.
Wolf, Manfred. 2006. Marketability contra freedom of parties in the law of land burden. Towards a unified system of land burdens? , eds Sjef van Erp, Bram Akkermans: 11–20. Antwerpen, Oxford, Intersentia.
Youssef, Karim. 2012. Consent in context: Fulfilling the promise of international arbitration. Eagan, MN, Thomson Reuters.
Zimmermann, Reinhard. 1990. The law of obligations: Roman foundations of the civil tradition. Cape Town, Juta & Co.
Zweigert, Konrad, Kotz, Hein. 2010. Einführung in die Rechtsvergleichung. Rus. ed. Moscow, Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia Publ. (In Russian)
Загрузки
Опубликован
2020-12-30
Как цитировать
Cавенков А. В. . (2020). Догматическое и политико-правовое обоснование вещных обязательств. Правоведение, 64(3), 352–372. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu25.2020.303
Выпуск
Раздел
Статьи
Лицензия
Статьи журнала «Правоведение» находятся в открытом доступе и распространяются в соответствии с условиями Лицензионного Договора с Санкт-Петербургским государственным университетом, который бесплатно предоставляет авторам неограниченное распространение и самостоятельное архивирование.
