The Western crescent rises — a verticality dimension in Louisiana’s mixed legal space
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu25.2023.101Abstract
The legal literature discussing mixed jurisdictions has mainly focused on horizontal law mixtures, especially those involving the Civil Law and the Common Law. Harnessing the legal questions raised by land loss in Louisiana’s landscape of waterbodies as a case study, this Article illustrates how American federal law, whether constitutional, statutory or judge-made, has interacted with the allocation of property rights under Louisiana state law. Among the various stakeholders, the legal implications of erosion and subsidence play out in two relationships: firstly, the relationship between private property owners and the State of Louisiana with regard to lakeshore, banks of rivers, bays and streams, and seashore; and secondly, the relationship between the State of Louisiana and the Federal Government with regard to their rights in the territorial sea. In the first relationship, the equal footing doctrine enunciated by the U. S. Supreme Court declares that, because the original thirteen states in the American Union owned the land under their natural navigable water bodies, subsequent entrants would likewise take ownership of such land. Based on the federal equal footing doctrine, Louisiana state law has enjoyed a margin of maneuver to make its own dispositions for the lakeshore, the bank of a river, bayou or stream, and the seashore. Also, when allocating ownership under state law, Louisiana courts have traditionally looked to the federal admiralty definition of navigability. The federal-state interface dominating the second relationship has come to be known as the “tidelands controversy” over submerged lands, along with the wealth of resources, seaward of the low-water mark on Louisiana’s coast. This led to a dance between the U. S. Supreme Court, the U. S. Congress and the State of Louisiana. Although Louisiana ultimately secured jurisdiction up to three nautical miles, its maritime belt still does not match Texas and Florida’s boundaries.
Keywords:
mixed jurisdictions, federal law, state law, lakes, rivers, seashore, territorial sea, erosion, subsidence, Tidelands Controversy
Downloads
References
Abernathy, Charles F., Puder, Markus G. 2021. Law in the United States: Cases and Commentaries. Eagan: West.
Arnold, John T. 2016. A Disconnect between Law and Science: Louisiana’s Waterbottom Ownership Laws in a Disappearing Coastline. Available at: https://jonesswanson.com/wp-content/uploads/other/Disconnect-between-Science-and-Law-Waterbottom-Law_Arnold_Submittedas-Journal-Copy_2.13.2016_with-cover-page.pdf (accessed: 12.12.2021).
Aslakson, Kenneth R. 2014. Making Race in the Courtroom: The Legal Construction of Three Races in Early Louisiana. New York: NYU Press.
Batiza, Rudolfo. 1958. The Influence of Spanish Law in Louisiana. Tulane Law Review 33: 11–32.
Burnham, Mack A. 1973. A Renaissance of the Civilian Tradition in Louisiana. Louisiana Law Review 33: 357–389.
Cairns, John W. 2009. The de la Vergne Volume and the Digest of 1808. Tulane European and Civil Law Forum 24: 31–81.
Cairns, John W. 2017. Spanish Law, the Teatro de la legislación universal de España e Indias, and the Background to the Drafting of the Digest of Orleans of 1808. Tulane European and Civil Law Forum 31: 79–120.
Congressional Research Service. 1992. The Constitution of the United States of America: Analysis, and Interpretation (S. Doc. 103-6). Washington DC: U. S. Government Printing Office.
Drahozal, Christophe R. 2004. The Supremacy Clause: A Reference Guide to the United States Constitution. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers Inc.
Drennan, Ian, Pakendorf, Gunther, Viljoen Nicol. 2019. From Claudius to Schubert: Some Thoughts on the Transformation of Words into Music. International Review of the Aesthetics and Sociology of Music 50: 143–174.
Duplantis Gautreaux, Amy. 2016. Louisiana Water Bottoms and the Freeze Statute. Available at: https://www.gamb.com/louisiana-water-bottoms-and-the-freeze-statute/ (accessed: 12.12.2021).
Gordley, James. 1993. Common Law and Civil Law: Eine überholte Unterscheidung. Zeitschrift für Europäisches Privatrecht 1: 498–518.
Grüneberg, Christian. 2021. Einleitung. Palandt: Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch, eds Ellenberger, Jürgen, Grüneberg, Christian, Götz, Isabell, Herrler, Sebastian, Pückler, Renata von, Retzlaff, Björn,
Siede, Waltherm Sprau, Hartwig, Thorn, Karsten, Weidenkaff, Walter, Weidlich, Dietmar, Wicke, Hartmut: P. 1, para. 2. München: C. H Beck.
Gruning, David W. 2004. Mapping Society Through Law: Louisiana Civil Law Recodified. Tulane European and Civil Law Forum 19: 1–36.
Herman, Shael. 2012. Civil Recodification in an Anglophone Mixed Jurisdiction: A Bricoleur’s Playbook. Loyola Law Review 58: 487–558.
Hribernick, Paul, Wascom, Michael. 1982. Legal Implications of Coastal Erosion in Louisiana. Proceedings of the Conference on Coastal Erosion and Wetlands Modification in Louisiana: Causes, Consequences, and Options (Baton Rouge, October 5–7, 1981), ed. Donald F. Boesch:128–139. Washington DC: U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Biological Services Program, FWS/OBS-82/59.
Ireland, Gordon. 1937. Louisiana’s Legal System Reappraised. Tulane Law Review 11: 585–598.
Johnson, Jerah. 1989. La Coutume de Paris: Louisiana’s First Law. Louisiana History: The Journal of the Louisiana Historical Association 30: 145–155.
Kearny, Joseph D., Merrill Thomas W. 2015. Contested Shore: Property Rights in Reclaimed Land and the battle for Streeterville. Northwestern University Law Review 107, no. 3. P. 1057–1124.
Kilbourne, Richard H. Jr. 1987. A History of the Louisiana Civil Code: The Formative Years (1803–1839). Baton Rouge: Publications Institute, Paul M. Hebert Law Center, Louisiana State University.
Lee, Robert W. 1915. The Civil Law and the Common Law — A World Survey. Michigan Law Review 14: 89–101.
Lovett, John A., Leckey, Robert. 2016. Symposium Introduction, The Scholar, Teacher, Judge and Jurist in a Mixed Jurisdiction: Papers from the Fourth Congress of the World Society of Mixed Jurisdiction Jurists. Loyola Law Review 62: 613–620.
MacQueen, Hector, Zimmermann, Reinhard. 2006. European Contract Law: Scots and South African Perspectives. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Martin, Olivier. 1922–1930. Histoire de la Coutume de la Prévôté Vicomté de Paris. Paris: E. Leroux.
Meade, Jeannie C. 2009. The Hunt for the 1580 Coutume de Paris: Building the French Customary Law Collection at The Jacob Burns Law Library. GW Magazine Summer: 43–47.
Mestayer, Jacques. 2016. Saving Sportsman’s Paradise: Article 450 and Declaring Ownership of Submerged Lands in Louisiana. Louisiana Law Review 76: 889–920.
Mohnhaupt, Heinz. 2011. Historische Konkurrenzen und Beeinflussungen zwischen Privatrecht und Öffentlichem Recht. Rechtsgeschichte: Zeitschrift des Max-Planck-Instituts für Europäische Rechtsgeschichte 19: 239–246.
Moreau Lislet, Louis, Carleton, Henry. 1820. The Laws of the Siete Partidas Which Are Still in Force in the State of Louisiana. New Orleans: J. M’Karaher, 1820.
National Geographic. 2018. Resource Library — Encyclopedic Entry: Erosion. Available at: https://www.nationalgeographic.org/encyclopedia/erosion/ (accessed: 12.12.2021).
Örücü, Esin. 2008. What Is a Mixed Legal System: Exclusion or Expansion? Journal of Comparative Law 3: 34–52.
Palmer, Vernon Valentine. 2001. Mixed Jurisdictions Worldwide: The Third Legal Family. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Palmer, Vernon Valentine. 2013. Mixed Legal Systems — The Origins of this Species. Tulane European and Civil Law Forum 28: 103–120.
Puder, Markus G. 2017. Das Zivilgesetzbuch von Louisiana: Zweisprachige Erstausgabe mit einer Einleitung. Tübingen: Nomos.
Puder, Markus G. 2020. Law and Language in Action: Transformative Experiences Associated with Translating the Louisiana Civil Code into German. Rabels Zeitschrift für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht 84: 228–263.
Puder, Markus G. 2020. Legal Transplants under the Magnifying Glass: A Bridging Study from Louisiana to Germany and Back. Tulane European and Civil Law Forum 35: 1–31.
Puder, Markus G. 2022. Dynamische Rechtsvergleichung im Gravitationsfeld von Recht und Sprache: Erfahrungen und Erkenntnisse aus meiner Übersetzung des Zivilgesetzbuchs von Louisiana aus dem Englischen ins Deutsche. Schweizer Juristen-Zeitung 8: 379–396.
Puder, Markus G., Lovett, John A., Wilson, Evelyn L. 2020. Louisiana Property Law: The Civil Code, Cases and Commentary. Durham: Carolina Academic Press.
Puder, Markus G., Rudokvas A. D. 2019. How Trust-Like is Russia’s Fiduciary Management? Answers from Louisiana. Louisiana Law Review 79: 1071–1102.
Radin, Max, Nichols, Madeleine W. 1932. Las Siete Partidas. California Law Review 20: 260–285.
Reid, Kenneth G. C., Zimmermann, Reinhard. 2000. A History of Private Law in Scotland. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schimpf, Michael. 2019. The State is No Crook After 30 Years. Available at: https://lawreview.law.lsu.edu/2019/11/19/the-state-is-no-crook-after-30-years/ (accessed: 12.12.2021).
Snyder, David V. 1998. Comparative Law in Action: Promissory Estoppel, the Civil Law, and the Mixed Jurisdiction. Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law. 15: 695–751.
Spiller Daggett, Harriet, Dainow, Joseph, Hebert, Paul M., McMahon, Henry G. 1937. A Reappraisal Appraised: A Brief for the Civil Law of Louisiana. Tulane Law Review 12: 12–41.
Tancelin, Maurice. 1907. Introduction. The Scope and Interpretation of the Civil Code of Lower Canada / ed. F. P. Walton: 1. Montreal: Wilson & Lafleur.
Tetley, William. 2000. Mixed Jurisdictions: Common Law v. Civil Law (Codified and Uncodified). Louisiana Law Review 60: 677–738.
Teubner, Gunther. 1998. Legal Irritants: Good Faith in British Law or How Unifying Law Ends up in New Divergences. Modern Law Review 61: 11–32.
Tucker, John H. 1932. Source Books of Louisiana Law. Tulane Law Review 6: 280–300.
Ward, Roger K. 1997. The French Language in Louisiana Law and Legal Education: A Requiem. Louisiana Law Review 57: 1283–1324.
Yiannopoulos, Athanassios N. 1992. Two Critical Years in the Life of the Louisiana Civil Code. Louisiana Law Review 53: 5–33.
Zimmermann, Reinhard. 2001. Common law und Ius Commune: Unkodifizierte Mischrechtsordnungen im Vergleich. Aufbruch nach Europa: 75 Jahre Max-Planck-Institut für Privatrecht, eds Besedow, Jürgen, Drobnig, Ulrich Drobnig, Ellger, Reinhard, Hopt, Klaus J., Kötz, Hein, Kulms, Rainer, Mestmäcker, Ernst-JoachimTübingen. Mohr Siebeck: 851–870.
Zimmermann, Reinhard. 2004. Double Cross: Comparing Scots and South African Law. Mixed Legal Systems in Comparative Perspective: Property and Obligations in Scotland and South Africa, eds Zimmermann, Reinhard, Visser, Daniel, Reid, Kenneth G. C. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 1–33.
Zimmermann, Reinhard, Visser, Daniel. 1996. Southern Cross: Civil Law and Common Law in South Africa. Oxford: Clarendon, 1996.
Zweigert, Konrad, Kötz, Hein. 1987. Introduction to Comparative Law (transl. T. Weir). Oxford: Clarendon Press
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Articles of "Pravovedenie" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.
