Borders of states’ jurisdiction in regard to international commercial arbitration

  • Evgenii E. Evseev St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation; 15, Kolomyazhskiy pr., St. Petersburg, 197348, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9589-2288

Abstract

The article is devoted to the problem of binding the arbitral proceedings to the place’s legislation where they are held. This binding, which was justified in the doctrine through the postulates of legal positivism in the first quarter of the 20th century and implemented in the first international treaties related to international commercial arbitration, has now lost its practical significance and creates many difficulties for all participants of arbitration. For many decades, there has been a steady trend towards the separation of international commercial arbitration into a special autonomous legal order, which is expressed both in the doctrinal theory of the delocalization of international commercial arbitration and in the legislation of states pursuing a friendly policy. The author considers some of the problems that arise from the existence of binding the arbitral proceedings to the laws of the place where it is held, conducts a historical and legal analysis of the origin and development of this binding, and analyzes the existing concepts about
the nature of international commercial arbitration institution where the need of binding the arbitration to a particular state jurisdiction, or the absence of such a need, are substantiated. Basing on a detailed review of the individual components of the dispute procedure in international
commercial arbitration, the existing manifestations of its autonomy, as well as the problems of the institutions for contesting, recognizing and enforcing arbitral awards, the author draws conclusions about the possibility of refusing to bind arbitration proceedings to the jurisdiction of the place where it is held, and also suggests possible ways to implement such a refusal.

Keywords:

international commercial arbitration, legal nature, place of arbitration, delocalization, autonomy, cancellation of arbitral award, arbitrability, public order, conflict of laws rules, choice of applicable law

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

Author Biography

Evgenii E. Evseev, St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation; 15, Kolomyazhskiy pr., St. Petersburg, 197348, Russian Federation

Student; Individual Entrepreneur

References

References

Alimova, Yana O. 2010. Practice of international commercial arbitration as a source of lex mercatoria. Aktual’nye problemy rossiiskogo prava 3 (16): 340–349. (In Russian)

Anurov, Vasiliy N. 2013. Conflict of jurisdiction in contesting an arbitration agreement. Moscow, Infotropiс Media Publ. (In Russian)

Astakhova, Daria O. 2019. The trend of delocalization of international commercial arbitration. PhD Thesis. Moscow, Moscow State Institute of International Relations. (In Russian)

Avdulova, Anna E. 2019. An arbitrator’s duty to render enforceable award in international commercial arbitration. Molodoi uchenyi: mezhdunarodnyi nauchnyi zhurnal 22 (260): 266–271. (In Russian)

Baglai, Marat V., Leibo, Yurii I., Entin, Lev M. 2016. Constitutional Law of Foreign Countries. Moscow, Infra-M, Norma Publ. (In Russian)

Bakhin, Sergey V. 2015. Prejudice: state courts and international commercial arbitration (correlation of state and arbitration jurisdiction). Zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava 3: 37–49. (In Russian)

Belova, Maria S., Nikishina Ekaterina M. 2018. The parties included an arbitration clause in the contract. Will sanctions prevent a dispute from being considered. Arbitrazhnaia praktika dlia iuristov 7: 88–94. (In Russian)

Bergé, Jean-Sylvestre, Romano, Santi. 2015. The legal order. Paris, Dalloz Publ.

Berger, Klaus Peter. 1993. Party Autonomy in International Economic Arbitration. The American Review of International Arbitration IV: 1–36.

Brekoulakis, Stavros L. 2011. Arbitrability and Conflict of Jurisdictions: The (diminishing) relevance of lex fori and lex loci arbitri. Conflict of Laws and Arbitration: 117–139.

Brinner, R. 2003. New York Convention: the philosophy and goals of the Convention. Treteiskii sud 6: 15–17. (In Russian)

Bulanov, Vadim V. 2012. The category of closest connection in private international law. PhD Thesis. Moscow, Kutafin Moscow State Law University. (In Russian)

Chuprunov, Ivan S. 2011. Problems of determining the law applicable to issues of arbitrability. Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava 5: 92–127. Available at: https://wiselawyer.ru/poleznoe/50403-problematika-opredeleniya-prava-primenimogo-voprosam-arbitrabelnosti (accessed: 04.04.2020). (In Russian)

Gaillard, Emmanuel. 2008. Philosophical Aspects of International Arbitration Law. Leiden, Martinus Nijhoff Publ. (In French)

Gaillard, Emmanuel. 2010. Legal Theory of International Arbitration. Leiden, Boston, Martinus Nijhoff Publ.

Goode, Roy. 2001. The Role of the Lex Loci Arbitri in International Commercial Arbitration. Arbitration International 17 (1): 19–40.

Hanotiau, Bernard. 2014. The Law Applicable to Arbitrability. Singapore Academy of Law Journal 26: 874–885.

Iaduta, Vladimir. 2015. International Arbitration in Terms of Sanctions. Rossiiskoe agentstvo pravovoi i sudebnoi informatsii. Available at: http://rapsinews.ru/banking_law_publication/20150423/273608711.html (accessed: 04.04.2020). (In Russian)

Janićijević, Dejan. 2005. Delocalization in International Commercial Arbitration. Law and Politics 3 (1): 63–71.

Karabelnikov, Boris R. 2012. International Commercial Arbitration. Moscow, Infotropiс Media Publ. (In Russian)

Kurochkin, Sergey A. 2015. The modern doctrine of international commercial arbitration: development trends. Treteiskii sud 4: 96–108. (In Russian)

Kurochkin, Sergey A. 2015. The recent trends in the foreign doctrine of international commercial arbitration: a brief overview. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa 6: 42–68. (In Russian)

Lebedev, Sergey N.1965. International Trade Arbitration. Moscow, Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia Publ. (In Russian)

Lew, Julian D. M., Mistelis, Loukas A., Kröll, Stefan M. 2003. Comparative International Commercial Arbitration. The Hague, London, New York, Kluwer Law International Publ.

Mann, Frederick Alexander. 1967. Lex Facit Arbitrum. Sanders P. (ed.) International Arbitration: Liber Amicorum for Martin Domke: 157–183. The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff Publ.

Muranov, Aleksandr I. 2017. Place of international commercial arbitration. Features of this category in Russian law. Vestnik mezhdunarodnogo kommercheskogo arbitrazha 2 (15): 67–96. (In Russian)

Park, William W. 1983. The Lex Loci Arbitri and International Commercial Arbitration. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 32: 21–52.

Paulsson, Jan. 1981. Arbitration Unbound: An Award Detached from the Law of the Country of Origin. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 30: 358–387.

Paulsson, Jan. 1983. Delocalization of International Commercial Arbitration: When and Why it Matters. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 32: 53–61.

Paulsson, Jan. 2013. The Idea of Arbitration. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Platte, Martin. 2003. An Arbitrator’s Duty to Render Enforceable Awards. Journal of International Arbitration 20 (3): 307–313.

Plekhanov, Vadim V., Usoskin, Sergey V. Autonomy of international commercial arbitration: on the issue of coordination between different jurisdictions in the process of recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards of international commercial arbitration. Vestnik mezhdunarodnogo kommercheskogo arbitrazha 1: 31–60. (In Russian)

Polyakov, Yurii V. 2009. “Delocalized” arbitration in the doctrine of private international law and the practice of international arbitration. Zakon i pravo 3: 81–83. (In Russian)

Popov, Maksim A. 2002. Theoretical and practical problems of the Russian regulation model of arbitration courts. PhD Thesis. St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg State University. (In Russian)

Poudret, Jean-François, Besson, Sébastien. 2007. Comparative Law of International Arbitration. London, Sweet & Maxwell Publ.

Pravdina, Arina A. 2017. Phenomenon of delocalization of international commercial arbitration. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo 2: 7–18. Available at: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=23161 (accessed: 04.04.2020). (In Russian)

Racine, Jean-Baptiste. 2005. Réflexions sur l’autonomie de l’arbitrage commercial international. Revue de l’arbitrage 2: 305–360.

Sanders, Pieter. 1975. Trends in the Field of International Commercial Arbitration. Recueil des cours 120: 205–296.

Seraglini, Christophe. 2001. Police laws and international arbitral justice. Paris, Dalloz Publ.

Skvortsov, Oleg Yu. 2017. Commercial arbitration: a paradigm evolution. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika 4: 3–7. (In Russian)

Skvortsov, Oleg Yu. 2018. The principle of paternalism and the regulation of arbitration in the Russian Federation. Mezhdunarodnyi kommercheskii arbitrazh i voprosy chastnogo prava: collection of articles: 125–130. Moscow, Statut Publ. (In Russian)

Vilkova, Nina G. 2013. Self-regulation by international contracts parties of their relations is one of the elements of modern lex mercatoria. Muranov A., Plekhanov V. (eds) Liber Amicorum in honor of the 50th anniversary of A. N. Zhiltsov. Cross-border trade and law: 21–30. Moscow, Infotropic Media Publ. (In Russian)

Volgina, V. 2017. The phenomenon of delocalization of international commercial arbitration. Skif. Voprosy studencheskoi nauki 10: 166–171. (In Russian)

Yakovlev, Aleksandr V. 2009. Institutional approach in the legal theory of state. PhD Thesis. Moscow, The Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences. (In Russian)

Published
2020-12-03
How to Cite
Evseev, E. E. (2020). Borders of states’ jurisdiction in regard to international commercial arbitration. Pravovedenie, 63(3), 440-459. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu25.2019.306
Section
Articles