Methodological aspects of ecological criminology

  • Yulia A. Sluchevskaya Kaliningrad Division of the Saint-Petersburg University of the Ministry of Interior of the Russian Federation, 30, ul. Generala Galitskogo, Kaliningrad, 236006, Russian Federation


The article discusses the prerequisites for identifying an independent direction of criminological research — ecological criminology. The influence of the main philosophical doctrines on the formation of modern ecological legislation is studied. It is noted that the process of ecologization of the social sphere, which includes legal institutions, has touched upon criminological research, their appearance was the result of this process. Ecological criminology is directly related to the general criminological theory and the result of its development. At the same time, it is methodologically closely connected with the science of environmental law. The article covers the discussion about the name of the direction of criminology. Linguistic difficulties associated with the foreign origin of certain terms are noted. For more than 25 years, the study of a complex of phenomena related to environmental crime in world criminology has been viewed as an independent direction of criminological research. At the same time, it is premature to say that this direction has been established. Questions of methodology remain unresolved: about the object, subject, method, and terminology. This article is devoted to the disclosure of these major problems. The article substantiates the use of the term “environmental criminology” in domestic science. On the basis of systematization of the main approaches to the definition of the concept of “crime,” formed within the framework of criminological research (legal, social and natural law), the author makes conclusions about the content of the subject and object of environmental criminology. The peculiarities of the construction of the criminal law norm and the concept of “public danger” are examined. The validity of the inclusion of environmental harm in the object and subject of research carried out in the framework of environmental criminology is substantiated. Analyzing the position of the social approach, the author justifies the need to include in the object and subject of environmental criminology problems associated with the actual or potential transformation of environmentally significant behavior into criminal. The features of the methodology of environmental criminology, which are manifested in the fact that it uses not only the methods typical for criminology and law, but also for natural sciences, are considered. 


ecological criminology, criminology, environmental law, crime, environmental


Download data is not yet available.


Brinchuk, Michael M. 1998. On the conceptual categories of environmental law. Gosudarstvo i parvo 9: 20–28. (In Russian)

Brinchuk, Michael M. 2010. The Universe is a universal natural ecosystem: ecological-legal context. Proceedings of the Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Actual problems of state and law 3: 72–100. (In Russian)

Degterev, Denis A. 2014. The use of mathematical methods in law. Gosudarstvo i parvo 8: 82–87. (In Russian)

Deryuga, Artyom N. 2011. Object and subject of administrative delictology. Gosudarstvo i parvo 1: 97–100. (In Russian)

Dubovik, Olga L. 2007. Environmental Criminology: Development Trends, Methodology, New Directions (on the example of the study of illegal environmental trade). Modern criminal law and criminology. Ed. A. Zhalinskii. Moscow: 221–229. (In Russian)

Frank N. K., Lynch M. J. 1992. Corporate Crime, Corporate Violence. Albany, Harrow and Heston.

Gernet, Michael N. 1974. Selected Works. Moscow, Legal Literature Publ. (In Russian)

Gibbs, Carole, Gore, Meredith, McGarrell, Edmund, Rivers Louie. 2010. Introducing conservation criminology: Towards interdisciplinary scholarship on environmental crimes and risks. British Journal of Criminology 50 (1): 124–144. https://doi:10.1093/bjc/azp045

Gurinskaya, Anna L. 2018. The Anglo-American Crime Prevention Model: A Critical Analysis. St. Petersburg, Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia Publ. (In Russian)

Halsey, Mark. 2004. Against “green” criminology. British Journal of Criminology 44 (6): 833–853. https://doi:10.1093/bjc/azh068

Herbig, F.J.W., Joubert S.J. 2006. Criminological Semantics: Conservation Criminology — Vision or Vagary? Acta Criminologica 19 (3): 88–103.

Inshakov, Sergei M. 2012. Crime research Problems of methodology and methodology. Moscow. UNITY DANA Publ. (In Russian)

Khilyuta, Vadim V. 2017. The Prospects of Development of Methodology of Criminal Law During the Postmodern Era. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava 5 (245): 88–96. (In Russian)

Kolbasov, Oleg S. 1999. Terminological walks in ecology. Gosudarstvo i parvo 10: 27–37. (In Russian)

Kuznetsova, Ninel F. 2010. The significance of the social danger of acts for their criminalization and decriminalization. Gosudarstvo i parvo 6: 67–75. (In Russian)

Kvashis, Vitaly E. 2015. Selected Works on Criminal Law and Criminology (1967–2014). St. Petersburg, Law Center Publ. (In Russian)

Lemieux, Andrew, Clarke, Ronald. 2009. The international ban on ivory sales and its effects on elephant poaching in Africa. British Journal of Criminology 49 (4): 451–471. https://doi:10.1093/ bjc/azp030.

Matskevich, Igor M. 2006. The theoretical concept of crime and the problem of its operationalization. Lex Russica 3 (65): 524–541. (In Russian)

Nomokonov, Vitaly A., Sudakova, Tatyana M. 2018. Positive criminology — the criminology of the future? Lex Russica 9 (142): 29–37. (In Russian)

Quinney, Richard. 1977. Class, State and Crime. New York, David McKay.

Rozin, Vadim M. 2016. Philosophy of Law: The Genesis of Law. Features of legal thinking. The criminal identity. Moscow, LENAND Publ. (In Russian)

Schmidt, Holger. 2013. Ein grüner Zweig der Kriminologie? Kriminologisches Journal 4: 260–278.

Shefel, Sergey V. 2017. Ecosophic conceptualization of the progress of formation of a personality as a subject of harmonization of legal relations in the ecosphere. Lex Russica 6 (127): 51–59. (In Russian)

Smykalin, Alexander S. 2017. Basic methodological concepts of the course “History of Russian State and Law”. Gosudarstvo i parvo 6: 99–108. (In Russian)

South, Nigel. 1998. A green field for criminology? A proposal for a perspective. Theoretical Criminology 2 (2): 211–233. https://doi/10.1177/1362480698002002004.

Spiridonov, Lev I. 1978. Sociology of crime. Moscow. (In Russian)

Sychev, Andrew A. 2014. Ethics of environmental responsibility. Moscow, Alpha-M Publ. (In Russian)

Tangiev, Bahaudin B. 2005. Ecocriminology (oikoscrimenlogos). Paradigm and the theory. Methodology and practice of Actual Law. St. Petersburg, Law Center Publ. (In Russian)

Wellsmith, Melanie. 2010. The applicability of crime prevention to problems of environmental harm: A consideration of illicit trade in endangered species. Global environmental harm: Criminological perspectives. Ed. by R.White. London, Willan: 132–149.

White, Rob. 2008. Crimes against nature: Environmental criminology and ecological justice. Cullompton, Willan.

White, Rob. 2011. Transnational environmental crime: Towards an eco-global criminology. London, Routledge.

Zahn, Margaret. 1999. Presidential address: Thoughts on the future of criminology. Criminology 37 (1): 1–16.

Zhalinskii, Alfred E. 2012. Update Criminology. Pravo i politika 5: 828–835. (In Russian)

Zhalinskii, Alfred E. 2014. Criminological characteristics of crime. Zhalinskii, Alfred E. Selected works. Vol. 1. Criminology. Moscow, Higher School of Economics Publ. (In Russian)

How to Cite
Sluchevskaya, Y. (2020). Methodological aspects of ecological criminology. Pravovedenie, 62(4), 735-750.