Experience of law: from psychologism to phenomenological germeneutics
Abstract
The article is devoted to the phenomenon of legal experience. The problem is placed into a broad historical and philosophical context and is conceived as a part of the problem of ontological unity. The question of the nature of law is transformed into the question of the grounds of law in the experience and nature of the latter. To clarify this issue, the author considers the methodological foundations, essence and internal contradictions of a number of concepts that localize the law in this or that aspect of the experience which is understood as a basic one, as well as the interrelation between them. The author of the psychological theory of law L. I. Petrażycki places the foundations of law in the emotional experience, keeping, however, the matter regarding the foundations of the emotions themselves unsettled. In turn, the phenomenology of law motivated in many ways by the desire to overcome psychologism sees the primary reality of law in the experience of a consciousness cleared of all prejudices, so that the sense (phenomenon) of law becomes obvious to it. At the same time, phenomenology does not provide a satisfactory answer to the question of how the phenomenon of law is related to our everyday experience. Finally, philosophical hermeneutics striving to overcome the aporias of the phenomenological project understands the basic level of experience, by which a person is connected with the world, as the experience of a specific being, while the structure of this experience is understood as a hermeneutic circle of our existence in time in interaction with the world. The latter is carried out in the form of a dialogue the outcome of which is never predetermined in advance and, therefore, implies fundamental openness and readiness to recognize the other in his claim to truth. It is this that is regarded as a basis of normativity. By discovering the basis of law neither in the mental experience, nor in the experience of the reduced consciousness, but rather in the experience as such, that is, the experience of one’s own historicity, the hermeneutical concept of law is much closer to the classical ontological theories of natural law than to the later deontological conceptions, because hermeneutics enroots the due in the experience structure itself.
Keywords:
experience of law, psychological theory of law, L. I. Petrażycki, phenomenology of law, hermeneutical philosophy of law
Downloads
References
References
Alekseev N. N. Osnovy filosofii prava [Foundation of the Philosophy of Law]. St.Petersburg, Lan Publ., 1999. 256 p. (In Russian)
Aristotle. Nikomakhova etika [Nicomachean Ethics]. Aristotle. General Works in 4 vols. Vol. 4. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 1983, pp. 53–293. (In Russian)
Brentano F. Izbrannye raboty [Selected Works]. Moscow, Dom intellektualnoi knigi, Russkoe fenomenologicheskoe obshchestvo Publ., 1996. 176 p. (In Russian)
Finnis J. Some Questions about Normativity and History in Petrażycki. Text of the report at the International Academic Conference “The Scientific Legacy of Leon
Petrażycki: History and Modernity (on the 150th Anniversary of his Birth)” (St. Petersburg, 14–15 December 2017).
Flyvbjerg B. Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and Hоw It Can Succeed Again. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2001. 212 р.
Gadamer H.-G. Istina i metod: Osnovy filosofskoi germenevtiki [Truth and Method]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1988. 704 p. (In Russian)
Gurvitch G. Filosofiia i sotsiologiia prava: izbr. soch. [Philosophy and Sociology of Law: Selected Works]. St. Petersburg, Izdatelskii Dom St. Peterb. gos. un-ta, Izdatelstvo iuridicheskogo fakulteta St. Peterb. gos. un-ta, 2004. 848 p. (In Russian)
Heidegger M. Fenomenologicheskie interpretatsii Aristotelia (Ekspozitsiia germenevticheskoi situatsii) [Phenomenological Interpretations of Aristotle (Initiation into Phenomenological Research)]. St. Petersburg, Gumanitarnaia akademiia Publ., 2012. 224 p. (In Russian)
Heidegger M. Prolegomeny k istorii ponyatiia vremeni [History of the Concept of Time: Prolegomena]. Tomsk, Vodolei Publ., 1998. 384 p. (In Russian)
Husserl E. Filosofiia kak strogaia nauka [Philosophy as Rigorous Science]. Novocherkassk, Saguna Publ., 1994. 357 p. (In Russian)
Husserl E. Idei k chistoi fenomenologii i fenomenologicheskoi filosofii [Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy]. Moscow, Akademicheskii proekt Publ., 2009. 489 p. (In Russian)
Husserl G. Pravo i mir [Law and World]. Izvestiia vuzov. Pravovedenie, 2015, no. 3, pp. 153–188. (In Russian)
Maksimov S. I. Pravovaia realnost’: opyt filosofskogo osmysleniia [Legal Reality: Experience of Philosophical Reflection]. Kharkov, Pravo Publ., 2002. 328 p. (In Russian)
Melkevik B. Iuridicheskaia praktika v zerkale filosofii prava [Legal Practice in the Mirror of Legal Philosophy]. St. Petersburg, Alef-Press Publ., 2015. 288 p. (In Russian)
Merleau-Ponty M. Somneniia Sezanna [Cézanne’s Doubt]. (Post)fenomenologiia: novaia fenomenologiia vo Frantsii i za ee predelami [(Post) phenomenology: a New Phenomenology in France and Beyond]. Moscow, Akademicheskii proekt Publ., 2017, pp. 102–118. (In Russian)
Mootz F.-J. III. Law, Hermeneutics and Rhetoric. Ashgate, 2010. 492 р.
Petrażycki L. K voprosu o sotsialnom ideale i vozrozhdenii estestvennogo prava [On the Question of the Social Ideal and the Revival of Natural Law]. Iuridicheskii vestnik [Law Herald], 1913, vol. 2, pp. 5–59. (In Russian)
Petrażycki L. Predislovie i vvedenie v nauku politiki prava [Foreword and Introduction to Science of the Policy of Law]. Universitetskie izvestiia [University Proceedings]. 1896, no. 8, pp. I–XCIX. (In Russian)
Petrażycki L. Teoriia prava i gosudarstva v sviazi s teoriei nravstvennosti [Theory of Law and the State in Connection with the Theory of Morality]. Moscow, Rossiiskaia politicheskaia entsiklopediia (ROSSPEN) Publ., 2010. 800 p. (In Russian)
Reinach A. Apriornye osnovaniia grazhdanskogo prava [A priori Foundations of the Civil Law]. Reinach A. Sobranie sochinenii [Collection of works]. Moscow, Dom intellektualnoi knigi Publ., 2001, pp. 153–326. (In Russian)
Ricoeur P. Konflikt interpretatsii. Ocherki o germenevtike [The Conflict of Interpretations. Essays in Hermeneutics]. Moscow, Akademicheskii proekt Publ., 2008. 695 p. (In Russian)
Ricoeur P. Spravedlivoe [The Just]. Moscow, Gnozis, Logos Publ., 2005. 304 p.(In Russian)
Ricoeur P. Torzhestvo iazyka nad nasiliem. Germenevticheskii podhod k filosofii prava [The Victory Language Gains over Violence]. Voprosy filosofii [Issues of Philosophy]. 1996, no. 4, pp. 27–36. (In Russian)
Sloterdijk P. Kritika tsinicheskogo razuma [Critique of Cynical Reason]. Ekaterinburg, U-Faktoriia Publ., Moscow, AST MOSKVA Publ., 2009. 800 p. (In Russian)
Stovba O. V. Temporalnaia ontologiia prava [The Temporal Ontology of Law]. St. Petersburg, Alef-Press Publ., 2017. 355 p. (In Russian)
Weinreb L. Natural Law and Rights. Natural Law Theory: Contemporary Essays. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1992, pp. 278–308.
Weizsäcker K. F. von. Fizika i filosofiia [Physics and Philosophy]. Voprosy filosofii, 1993, no. 1, pp. 115–125. (In Russian)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Articles of "Pravovedenie" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.