Человеческий биоматериал как объект права

Gennadij Sergeevich Vasil'ev

doi:10.21638/11701/spbu25.2018.205

Authors

Gennadij Sergeevich Vasil'ev Saint Petersburg State University https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7448-6515

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu25.2018.205

Abstract

The article deals with the issues related to the rights to the examination of human biomaterial after its separation from the human body. Biological samples are already recognized as legal objects in other countries, and they are subjects to the regime of property rights. In Russia, some private references to rights to examination biomaterial can also be explained if only it is recognized as property and ownership object. As a rule, the rights to such object belongs to the medical (scientific) organization, in which it was separated from the donor’s body. In the majority of cases, according to the current legislation, it is referred to things that are used freely. Two generally recognized limitations of this ownership right, namely, the need to obtain informed voluntary consent of the donor, as well as the right to the protection of personal data of the donor, are investigated. It is concluded that it is currently inappropriate to adopt a special federal law on these relations since in Russia public relations about the biomaterial are just beginning to take shape. It is desirable to publish explanations of the Supreme Court or the Ministry of health (as an authorized body of executive power in the field of medicine). Such an act would combine the achievements of law science and practice, but would remain an act of interpretation and did not entrust the legislator with responsibility for inevitable errors. This would leave room for their proper correction in the future.

Keywords:

legal objects, property rights, a biological sample, biomaterial, genetic information, personal data, a human body

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Литература

Атлашкина Д. К. Право на криоконсервацию и хранение половых клеток в рамках экстракорпорального оплодотворения // Медицина и право. Вып. 4 / под ред. И. М. Акулина. М., 2014. С. 144–152.

Васильев Г. С. О собственнике отходов — разворот судебной практики // Закон. 2015. № 12. С. 106–112.

Васильев Г. С. Переход права собственности на движимые вещи по договору. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, 2015. 308 с.

Васильев Г. С. Переход права собственности на движимые вещи по договору: дис. … канд. юрид. наук. СПб., 2006. 20 с.

Данилочкина Ю. В. Понятие и правовая природа медицинских услуг // Медицинское право. 2008. № 4. С. 9–16.

Крусс В. И. Личностные («соматические») права человека в конституционном и философско-правовом измерении: к постановке проблемы // Государство и право. 2000. № 10. C. 43–50.

Лаврик М. А. К теории соматических прав человека // Сибирский юридический вестник. 2005. № 3. С. 16–26.

Лебедев К. К. Договор на оказание услуг по криоконсервации генетического материала человека в целях его последующей трансплантации // Медицина и право: сб. науч. трудов. Вып. 1. СПб., 2011. C. 41–44.

Лоренц Д. В. Квазиятрогения: злоупотребления при трансплантации (завещании) человеческих органов и тканей // Медицина и право. Вып. 4 / под ред. И. М. Акулина. М., 2014. C. 36–43.

Майфат А. В., Лисаченко А. В. Тело человека, его отдельные части как объекты правового воздействия (некоторые предложения для обсуждения) // Юридический мир. 2002. № 2. С. 4–15.

Малeина М. Н. Статус органов, тканей, тела человека как объектов права собственности и права на физическую неприкосновенность // Законодательство. 2003. № 11. C. 13–20.

Мохов А. А. Новый закон о донорстве крови не решает главной проблемы — обеспеченности здравоохранения донорской кровью и ее компонентами // Медицинское право. 2013. № 1. С. 9–15.

Мызров С. Н., Нагорный В. А. К вопросу о вещно-правовом статусе органов и тканей человека: дифференцированный подход к решению проблемы // Медицинское право. 2012. № 3. С. 35–40.

Серебрякова А. А., Ворюшин М. С. Государственно-правовое регулирование использования органов и тканей человека как особых объектов гражданского права в целях трансплантации (компаративистское исследование) // Медицинское право. 2012. № 2. C. 36–39.

Степанова Е. Н. Характеристика правоотношений между донором и реципиентом в случаях прижизненного органного донорства // Актуальные проблемы правового регулирования медицинской деятельности: мат-лы первой Всеросс. науч.-практ. конференции. М., 2003. С. 152–154.

Тихомиров А. В. Медицинское право. М.: Статут, 1998. 418 с.

Терещенко Л. К. Модернизация информационных отношений и информационного законодательства. М., 2013. 227 c.

Allen C., Joly Y., Granadas Moreno P. Data Sharing, Biobanking and informed consent: a research paradox? // McGill Journal of Law & Health. 2013–2014. Vol. 7. P. 85–120.

Cambon-Thomsen A., et al. Trends in ethical and legal frameworks for the use of human biobanks // European Respiratory Journal. 2007. Vol. 30. P. 373–382.

De Castro L. Commodification and Exploitation: Arguments in Favour of Compensated Organ Donation // Journal of Medical Ethics. 2003. Vol. 29, no. 3. P. 142–146.

Faden R. R., Beauchamp T. L. A History and Theory of Informed Consent. Oxford University Press, 1986. 408 p.

Hofmann B. Broadening consent and diluting ethics? // Journal of Medical Ethics. 2009. Vol. 35, no. 2. P. 125–129.

Lowrance W. Learning from Experience: Privacy and the Secondary Use of Data in Health Research. London: The Nuffield Trust, 2002. URL: http://www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/sites/files/nuffield/publication/learning-from-experience-nov02.pdf (дата обращения: 22.06.2016).

Macilotti M., Penasa S., Tomasi M. Consent, Privacy and Property in the Italian Biobanks Regulation: A Hybrid Model Within EU? // Ethics, Law and Governance of Biobanking. National, European and International Approaches. Springer, 2015. P. 53–78.

Medical Law and Ethics: Altruism Reconsidered: Exploring New Approaches to Property in Human Tissue / eds. P. Sýkora, U. Wiesing, M. Steinmann. Routledge, 2016. 330 p.

Ogbogu U., Burningham S. Privacy protection and genetic research: where does the public interest lie? // Alberta Law Review. 2013–2014. Vol. 51. P. 471–495.

Tallacchini M. A Participatory Space Beyond the “Autonomy Versus Property” Dichotomy // Ethics, Law and Geverance of Biobanking. National, European and International Approaches. Springer, 2015. P. 21–38.

Tallacchini M. Governing by values, EU ethics: Soft tool, hard effects // Minerva. 2009. Vol. 47, no. 3. P. 281–306.

The Ethical and Legal Regulation of Human Tissue and Biobank Research in Europe / eds. K. Beier, S. Schnorrer, N. Hoppe, Ch. Lenk. Göttingen, 2011. 172 p.

Townsley M. L. Is there any body out there? A call for a new body of law to protect individual ownership interests in tissue samples used in medical research // Washburm Law Journal. 2014–2015. Vol. 54. P. 683–780.

Winickoff D. E. Partnership in U. K. Biobank: A third way for genomic property? // Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics. 2007. Vol. 35. P. 440–456.

Zika E., et al. Sample, data use and protection in biobanking in Europe: Legal issues // Pharmacogenomics. 2008. Vol. 9, no. 6. P. 773–781.

References

Allen C., Joly Y., Granadas Moreno P. Data Sharing, Biobanking and informed consent: a research paradox? McGill Journal of Law & Health, 2013–2014, vol. 7, pp. 85–120.

Atlaskina D. K. Pravo na kriokonservatsiiu i khranenie polovykh kletok v ramkakh ekstrakorporal’nogo oplodotvoreniia [The Right to cryopreservation and storage of germ cells under in vitro fertilization]. Meditsina i pravo [Medicine and law], iss. 4, ed. I. M. Akulin. Moscow, 2014, pp. 144–152. (In Russian)

Cambon-Thomsen A., et al. Trends in ethical and legal frameworks for the use of human biobanks. European Respiratory Journal, 2007, vol. 30, pp. 373–382.

Danilochkina Yu. V. Poniatie i pravovaia priroda meditsinskikh uslug [Concept and legal nature of medical services]. Meditsinskoe pravo [Medical law], 2008, no. 4, pp. 9–16. (In Russian)

De Castro L. Commodification and Exploitation: Arguments in Favour of Compensated Organ Donation. Journal of Medical Ethics, 2003, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 142–146.

Faden R. R., Beauchamp T. L. A History and Theory of informed consent. Oxford University Press, 1986. 408 p.

Hofmann B. Broadening consent and diluting ethics? Journal of Medical Ethics, 2009, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 125–129.

Kruss V. I. Lichnostnye («somaticheskie») prava cheloveka v konstitutsionnom i filosofsko-pravovom izmerenii: k postanovke problemy [Personal (“somatic”) human rights in the constitutional and philosophical-legal dimension: to the problem statement]. Gosudarstvo i pravo [State and Law], 2000, no. 10, pp. 43–50. (In Russian)

Laurenc D. V. Kvaziiatrogeniia: zloupotrebleniia pri transplantatsii (zaveshchanii) chelovecheskikh organov i tkanei [Kasutamine: abuse in the transplant (the will) of human organs and tissues]. Meditsina i pravo [Medicine and law], iss. 4, ed. I. M. Akulin. Moscow, 2014, pp. 36–43. (In Russian)

Lavrik M. A. K teorii somaticheskikh prav cheloveka [The theory of somatic rights of a person]. Sibirskii iuridicheskii vestnik [Siberian Law Bulletin], 2005, no. 3, pp. 16–26. (In Russian)

Lebedev K. K. Dogovor na okazanie uslug po kriokonservatsii geneticheskogo materiala cheloveka v tseliakh ego posleduiushchei transplantatsii [A contract for the provision of services on the cryopreservation of genetic material for its subsequent transplantation]. Meditsina i pravo: sb. nauch. trudov [Medicine and law. Collection of proceedings], iss. 1. St. Petersburg, 2011, pp. 41–44. (In Russian)

Lowrance W. Learning from Experience: Privacy and the Secondary Use of Data in Health Research. London, The Nuffield Trust, 2002. Available at: http://www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/sites/files/nuffield/publication/learning-from-experience-nov02.pdf (accessed: 22.06.2016).

Macilotti M., Penasa S., Tomasi M. Consent, Privacy and Property in the Italian Biobanks Regulation: A Hybrid Model Within EU? Ethics, Law and Governance of Biobanking. National, European and International Approaches. Springer, 2015, pp. 53–78.

Maifat A. V., Lisachenko A. V. Telo cheloveka, ego otdel’nye chasti kak ob’ekty pravovogo vozdeistviia (nekotorye predlozheniia dlia obsuzhdeniia) [Human body and its parts as objects of legal regulation (some suggestions for discussion)]. Iuridicheskii mir [Law world], 2002, no. 2, pp. 4–15. (In Russian)

Maleina M. N. Status organov, tkanei, tela cheloveka kak ob’ektov prava sobstvennosti i prava na fizicheskuiu neprikosnovennost’ [Status of organs, tissues, human body as objects of property rights and the right to physical integrity]. Zakonodatel’stvo [Legislation], 2003, no. 11, pp. 13–20. (In Russian)

Medical Law and Ethics: Altruism Reconsidered: Exploring New Approaches to Property in Human Tissue, eds. P. Sýkora, U. Wiesing, M. Steinmann. Routledge, 2016. 330 p.

Mitrov S. N., Nagorny V. A. K voprosu o veshchno-pravovom statuse organov i tkanei cheloveka: differentsirovannyi podkhod k resheniiu problemy [To the question about the proprietary and legal status of organs and tissues of man: a differentiated approach to solving the problem]. Meditsinskoe pravo [Medical law], 2012, no. 3, pp. 35–40. (In Russian)

Mokhov A. A. Novyi zakon o donorstve krovi ne reshaet glavnoi problemy — obespechennosti zdravookhraneniia donorskoi krov’iu i ee komponentami [The new law on blood donation does not solve the main problem — the provision of health care with donor blood and its components]. Meditsinskoe pravo [Medical law], 2013, no. 1, pp. 9–15. (In Russian)

Ogbogu U., Burningham S. Privacy protection and genetic research: where does the public interest lie? Alberta Law Review, 2013–2014, vol. 51, pp. 471–495.

Serebryakov A. A., Vorushin M. S. Gosudarstvenno-pravovoe regulirovanie ispol’zovaniia organov i tkanei cheloveka kak osobykh ob’ektov grazhdanskogo prava v tseliakh transplantatsii (komparativistskoe issledovanie) [State-legal regulation of the use of organs and tissues of man as a special objects of civil rights for the purpose of transplantation (comparative study)]. Meditsinskoe pravo [Medical law], 2012, no. 2, pp. 36–39. (In Russian)

Stepanova E. N. [Characteristics of legal relations between the donor and the recipient in cases of organ donation in vivo]. Aktual’nye problemy pravovogo regulirovaniia meditsinskoĭ deiatel’nosti: mat-ly pervoi Vseross. nauch.-prakt. konferentsii [Actual problems of legal regulation of medical activity. Materials of the first Russian scientificpractical conference]. Moscow, 2003, pp. 152–154. (In Russian)

Tallacchini M. A Participatory Space Beyond the “Autonomy Versus Property” Dichotomy. Ethics, Law and Geverance of Biobanking. National, European and International Approaches. Springer, 2015, pp. 21–38.

Tallacchini M. Governing by values, EU ethics: Soft tool, hard effects. Minerva, 2009, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 281–306.

Tereshchenko L. K. Modernizatsiia informatsionnykh otnoshenii i informatsionnogo zakonodatel’stva [Modernization of information relations and information legislation]. Moscow, 2013. 227 p. (In Russian)

The Ethical and Legal Regulation of Human Tissue and Biobank Research in Europe, eds. K. Beier, S. Schnorrer, N. Hoppe, Ch. Lenk. Göttingen, 2011. 172 p.

Tikhomirov A. V. Meditsinskoe pravo [Medical Law]. Moscow, Statut Publ., 1998. 418 p. (In Russian)

Townsley M. L. Is there any body out there? A call for a new body of law to protect individual ownership interests in tissue samples used in medical research. Washbum Law Journal, 2014–2015, vol. 54, pp. 683–780.

Vasiliev G. S. O sobstvennike otkhodov — razvorot sudebnoi praktiki [About the owner of waste — a turn of judicial practice]. Zakon [Law], 2015, no. 12, pp. 106–112. (In Russian)

Vasiliev G. S. Perekhod prava sobstvennosti na dvizhimye veshchi po dogovoru: dis. … kand. iurid. nauk [Transfer of ownership of movable things under the contract. PhD Thesis]. St. Petersburg, 2006. 20 p. (In Russian)

Vasiliev G. S. Perekhod prava sobstvennosti na dvizhimye veshchi po dogovoru [Transfer of ownership of movable things under the contract]. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, 2015. 308 p. (In Russian)

Winickoff D. E. Partnership in U. K. Biobank: A third way for genomic property? Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2007, vol. 35, pp. 440–456.

Zika E., et al. Sample, data use and protection in biobanking in Europe: Legal issues. Pharmacogenomics, 2008, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 773–781.