Trust and reasonable expectations in contracts — values that always matter (from the perspective of Polish private law)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu25.2020.402Abstract
Will a situation where the “competitive contract law” is developing alongside the classical contract law inevitably lead to a clash of these two contractual worlds? It has been suggested that there is a kind of “competition” between modern contract law and the classical one, with the final result seen in terms of a zero-sum game. The alternative is to perceive this phenomenon not as a “competitive arena” but a “cooperative one” (with a win-win result). By analogy to architecture, it means a peaceful refurbishment, where the foundation is preserved and the rest can be rebuilt in such a way that the whole construction will be solid and serve for decades. Some institutions of traditional contract law, altogether with their traditional functions, create elements that can make the whole construction stable and impervious to unforeseen and atypical situations. This article takes a close look at the three mechanisms present under the provisions of Poland’s Civil Code, namely interpretation (Article 65), supplementation (Article 56) and setting out obligations according to due performance (Article 354), which are based on traditional contract criteria, namely trust and reasonable expectations. The perspective of Polish law is presented with some references to Chinese law and culture, as this helps show that certain traditional criteria are recognised and do matter in different legal cultures. These traditional criteria of a contextual nature determine the meaning and content of contracts in almost every legal order and in model law. They can be seen as the elements that strengthen and stabilise the whole construction of contract law. The author raises the question whether nowadays a serious surgical intervention to the extent of contract law is necessary, or whether a delicate face-lifting would be sufficient (if at all). This question refers mainly to trust as a soft but crucial contractual tool at each contracting stage. The article presents the approach whereby trust (in particular), when acting as a unilaterally understood functional instrument, can reconcile the world of traditional contract law with the modern one. In other words, trust is recognised as a vital element connecting not only different legal cultures, but also traditional contract law with the modern one.
Keywords:
trust, reasonable expectations, loyalty, fairness, contract law, general clauses
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Babin, Ron, Bates, Kim, Sohal, Sajeev. 2017. The role of trust in outsourcing: More important than the contract? Journal of Strategic Contracting and Negotiation 3 (1): 38–46.
Bar, Christian von, Clive, Eric. (eds). 2009. Principles, Definitions and Model Rules of European Private Law. Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR) , Full Edition, prepared by Study Group on a European Civil Code and the Research Group on EC Private Law (Acquis Group), vol. 1. Munich, Sellier.
Bertrandias, Laurent, Fréchet, Marc, Lumineau, Fabrice. The Contract-Trust Debate From A Framing-Based Perspective: Findings From Franchise Contract Experiment . Available at: https://www.strategie-aims.com/events/conferences/2-xixeme-conference-de-l-aims/communications/17-revisiting-the-contract-trust-debate-from-a-framing-based-perspective-findings-from-franchise-contract-experiment/download (accessed: 01.12.2021).
Bil, Tomasz, Broniek, Aleksandra, Cincio, Aleksandra, Kiełbasa, Marcin (eds) 2011. The Civil Code, Polish-English , transl. by Tomasz Bil, Aleksandra Broniek, Aleksandra Cincio, Marcin Kiełbasa. Warszawa, Wolters Kluwer.
Black, Carolynn, Akintoye, Akintola, Fitzgerald, Eamon. 2000. An analysis of success factors and benefits of partnering in construction. International Journal of Project Management 18 (6): 423–434.
Bukspan, Eli. 2013. Trust and the Triangle Expectation Model in Twenty-First Century Contract Law. DePaul Business and Commercial Law Journal 11 (3): 380–415. Available at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/bclj/vol11/iss3/4 (accessed: 01.12.2021).
Cheung, Sai On, Wing Yiu, Tak, Pang, Hoi Yan, Wong, Wei Kei. 2008. A framework for trust in construction contracting. International Journal of Project Management 26: 821–829.
Child, John. 2001. Trust — The fundamental bond in global collaboration. Organizational Dynamics 29 (4): 274–288.
Cotterrell, Roger. 2019. Comparative Law and Legal Culture. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law , 2nd ed., eds Mathias Reimann, Reinhard Zimmermann. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199296064.013.0022.
De Ambrosis Vigna, Anna, Kijowski, Dariusz R. 2018. The Principle of Legitimate Expectations and the Protection of Trust in the Polish Administrative Law. Białostockie Studia Prawnicze 23 (2): 39–52.
Dębczyńska, Anna. 2017. Cultural Differences and Polish-Chinese Business Relations in Practice. Journal of Corporate Responsibility and Leadership 4 (2): 7–24.
Dziewięcki, Mateusz. 2018. Wybrane aspekty prawa kontraktowego Chińskiej Republiki Ludowej w ujęciu komparatystycznym. Prawo azjatyckie z perspektywy europejskiej , eds Mateusz Stępień, Rafał Łukasiewicz: 188–202. Toruń, Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek.
Eenmaa-Dimitrieva, Helen, Schmidt-Kessen, Maria José. 2019. Creating markets in no-trust environments: The law and economics of smart contracts. Computer Law & Security Review 35: 69–88.
Einstein A. 1950. Arms Can Bring No Security. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 6 (3): 71.
Eisenberg, Melvin Aron. 2000. The Emergence of Dynamic Contract Law. California Law Review 88: 1–77.
Faizel, Jacob. 2015. Concept and Evolvement of Chinese Contract Law . LLM dissertation. Cape Town, University of Cape Town.
Fish, Stanley. 2005. There is no textualist position. San Diego Law Review 42: 629–650.
Fu, Junwei. 2010. Modern European and Chinese contract law: A comparative study of party autonomy . Tilburg, Tilburg University School of Law. Available at: https://pure.uvt.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/7549119/Fu_modern_20_12_2010.pdf (accessed: 01.12.2021).
Fukuyama, Francis. 1995. Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity . New York, Free Press.
Gambetta, Diego. 1988. Can we trust trust. Trust, Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations , ed. by Diego Gambetta: 213–237. University of Oxford. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255682316_Can_We_Trust_Trust_Diego_Gambetta (accessed: 01.12.2021).
Grochowski, Mateusz. 2013. The practical potential of the DCFR Judgment of the Swedish Supreme Court (Högsta domstolen) of 3 November 2009 Case T 3-08. European Review of Contract Law 9 (1): 96–104.
Grzebyk, Piotr, Rott-Pietrzyk, Ewa, Su, Chen (eds). 2020. Sino-Polish perspectives on the theory and practice of contract law . Warsaw, Scholar Publishing House.
Grzybek, Joanna. 2018. Spójność norm moralnych i norm prawnych we współczesnych Chinach. Prawo azjatyckie z perspektywy europejskiej , eds Mateusz Stępień, Rafał Łukasiewicz: 13–21. Toruń, Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek.
Hagedorn, Axel. 2002. Western and Chinese Contract Law. A Comparative Cultural Perspective. Culture, Organization and Management in East Asia. Doing Business in China , eds Heidi Dahles, Harry Wels: 13–37. New York, Nova Science Publishers.
Harrison, Debbie. 2004. Is a Long-term Business Relationship an Implied Contract? Two views of a Relationship “Disengagement”. Journal of Management Studies 41 (1): 107–125. Available at: https://www.impgroup.org/uploads/papers/62.pdf (accessed: 01.12.2021).
Herbots, Jacques H. 2012. Interpretation of Contracts. Elgar Encyclopedia of Comparative law , ed. by Jan M. Smith: 421–448. Cheltenham, Northampton, Edward Elgar Publ.
Hondius, Ewoud, Santos Silva, Marta, Nicolussi, Andrea, Salvador Coderch, Pablo, Wendehorst, Christiane, Zoll, Fryderyk (eds). 2021. Coronavirus and the Law in Europe . Cambridge, Antwerp, Chicago, Intersentia.
Huan, Shiyuan. 2017. General Principles under CCL. Chinese Contract Law. Civil and Common Law Perspectives , eds Larry A. DiMatteo, Lei Chen: 377–403. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Kern, Thomas, Willcocks, Leslie. 2000. Exploring information technology outsourcing relationships: Theory and practice. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 9 (4): 321–350.
Klein Woolthuis, Rosalinde, Hillebrand, Bas, Nooteboom, Bart. 2005. Trust, Contract and Relationship Development. Organization Studies 26 (6): 813–840.
Kornet, Nicole. 2010. Contracting in China: Comparative Observations on Freedom of Contract, Contract Formation, Battle of Forms and Standard Form Contracts. Electronic Journal of Comparative Law 14.1 (7.3). Available at: http://www.ejcl.org/141/art141-1.pdf (accessed: 01.12.2021).
Kötz, Hein. 2019. Comparative contract law. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law , eds Mathias Reimann, Reinhard Zimmermann: 903–929. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Kucharska, Ewa (transl.) 2011. The Civil Code [Kodeks cywilny] . Bilingual Edition. Warszawa, Wolters Kluwer.
Leng, Jeng, Wei, Shen. 2016. The Evolution of Contract Law in China: Convergence in Law But Divergence in Enforcement? Private Law in China and Taiwan — Legal and Economic Analyses , eds Yun-Chien Chang, Wei Shen, Wen-yeu Wang: 63–99. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Leonhard, Chunlin. 2009. Beyond the Four Corners of a Written Contract: A Global Challenge to U. S. Contract Law. Pace International Law Review 21: 1–36.
Lewis, J. David, Weigert, Andrew. 1985. Trust as a social reality. Social Forces 63 (4): 967–985.
Liming, Wang, Chuanxi, Xu. 1999. Fundamental Principles of China’s Contract Law. Asian Law 1 (13): 2–9.
Longchamps de Berier Franciszek. 2019. Decodification of Contract Law. Theory and Practice of Codification: the Chinese and Polish Perspective /, eds Chen Su, Franciszek Longchamps de Berier, Piotr Grzebyk: 137–149. Beijing, Social Sciences Academic Press (China).
Machnikowski, Piotr, Gniewek, Edward. (eds). 2017. Kodeks cywilny. Komentarz . Warszawa, C. H. Beck.
Machnikowski, Piotr. 2010. Prawne instrumenty ochrony zaufania przy zawieraniu umowy . Wrocław, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.
Machnikowski, Piotr, Balcarczyk, Justyna, Drela, Monika. 2017. Contract Law in Poland . Alphen aan den Rijn, Kluwer Law International.
Matheson, John H. 2006. Convergence, Culture and Contract Law in China. Minnesota Journal of International Law 15: 329–382. Available at: http://scholarship.law.umn.edu/faculty_articles/105 (accessed: 01.12.2021).
McConnaughay, Philipp J. 2001. Rethinking the Role of Law and Contracts in East-West Commercial Relationships. Virginia Journal of International Law 41: 428–479.
Möllering, Guido. 2001. The Nature of Trust: From Georg Simmel to a Theory of Expectation, Interpretation and Suspension. Sociology 35 (2): 403–420.
Nelken, David. 2004. Using the Concept of Legal Culture. Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 29: 1–26. http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/AUJlLegPhil/2004/11.pdf (accessed: 01.12.2021).
Nelken, David. 2016. Comparative Legal Research and Legal Culture: Facts, Approaches, and Values. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 12: 45–62.
Niglia, Leone. 2015. The Struggle for European Private Law. A Critique of Codification . Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Pałecki, Krzysztof. 1974. O użyteczności pojęcia kultura prawna. Państwo i Prawo 2: 65–75.
Pattison, Patricia, Herron, Daniel. 2003. The Mountains are High, and the Emperor is Far Away: Sanctity of Contract in China. American Business Law Journal 40: 459–510.
Roca, Encarna. 2007. The interpretation of contract in accordance with the Principles of European Contract Law. Kierunki europeizacji prawa prywatnego. Księga pamiątkowa dedykowana Profesorowi Jerzemu Rajskiemu , eds Adam Brzozowski, Wojciech Kocot, Katarzyna Michałowska: 173–192. Warszawa, C. H. Beck
Rott-Pietrzyk, Ewa. 2007. Klauzula generalna rozsądku w prawie prywatnym . Warszawa, C. H. Beck.
Rott-Pietrzyk, Ewa. 2007. Wykładnia oświadczenia woli (stadium prawnoporównawcze). Studia Prawa Prywatnego 3–4: 1–47.
Rott-Pietrzyk, Ewa. 2010. Klauzule generalne a wykonanie zobowiązania (z uwzględnieniem koncepcji klauzul generalnych w projekcie KC). Zaciąganie i wykonywanie zobowiązań , eds Edward Gniewek, Katarzyna Górska, Piotr Machnikowski: 327–342. Warszawa, C. H. Beck.
Rott-Pietrzyk, Ewa. 2011. Introduction (“Interpretation” of private law). Interpretation in Polish, German and European Private Law , eds Bettina Heiderhoff, Grzegorz Żmij: 3–15. Berlin, New York, Sellier.
Rott-Pietrzyk, Ewa. 2014. Interpretation of Contracts under CESL. Zeitschrift für Europaisches Privatrecht (ZEuP) 2: 371–399.
Rott-Pietrzyk, Ewa. 2020. The significance of trust and reasonable expectations in commercial contracts (from the perspective of Polish Law with some references to Chinese law and culture). Sino-Polish perspectives on the theory and practice of contract law , eds Patrycja Grzebyk, Ewa Rott-Pietrzyk, Chen Su: 127–158. Warsaw, Scholar Publishing House.
Rousseau, Denise M., Sitkin, Sim, Burt, Ronald S., Camerer, Colin. 1998. Not so different after all: a cross-discipline view of trust. Academy Management Review 23 (3): 393–404.
Schulte-Nölke, Hans. 2012. Common European Sales Law (CESL). Common European Sales Law (CESL). A commentary , ed. by Reiner Schulze: 98–102. Baden-Baden, Nomos.
Stępień, Mateusz. 2013. Kultura prawna. Leksykon socjologii prawa , eds Anna Kociołek-Pęksa, Mateusz Stępień: 120–124. Warszawa, C. H. Beck.
Storme, Matthias E. 2003. Good faith and contents of contracts in European private law. European Journal of Comparative Law 7 (1): 1–14.
Storme, Matthias E. 2006. Freedom of Contract: Mandatory and Non-mandatory Rules in European Contract Law. Iuridica International 11: 34–44.
Tokarczyk, Roman. 2012. Współczesne kultury prawne .Warszawa, Wolters Kluwer Polska.
Twigg-Flesner, Christian. 2017. General Principles of Chinese Contract Law. An English Common Law Perspective. Chinese Contract Law. Civil and Common Law Perspective , eds Larry A. DiMatteo, Chen Lei. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Vogenauer, Stefan, Kleinheisterkamp Jan (eds). 2009. Commentary on the UNIDTOIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts (PICC) . Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Wang, Cheng Lu, Lin, Xiaohua, Chan, Allan K. K., Shi, Yizheng. 2005. Conflict Handling Styles in International Joint Ventures: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-National Comparison. Management International Review 45: 3–21.
Wendehorst, Christiane. 2012. Common European Sales Law (CESL). Common European Sales Law (CESL). A commentary , ed. by Reiner Schulze: 303–311. Baden-Baden, Nomos.
Wong, Shek Pui, Cheung, Sai On. 2004. Trust in construction partnering: the views from parties of the partnering dance. International Journal of Project Management 22 (6): 437–446.
Wong, Shek Pui, Cheung, Sai On. 2005. Structural equation model of trust and partnering success. Journal of Management in Engineering 21 (2): 70–80.
Wrbka, Stefan. 2015. European Consumer Access to Justice Revisited . Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Wróblewski, Jerzy. 1988. Prawo jako zjawisko kultury w amerykańskiej filozofii i teorii prawa, Zeszyty Naukowe Wydziału Prawa i Administracji Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego. Studia Prawnoustrojowe 1: 159–173.
Xiaoyang, Zhang (ed.). 2013. Chinese Contract Law . Hong Kong, Open University of Hong Kong Press..
Xue, Li, Meng, Meng. 2007. A Cross-Cultural Characterization of Chinese and English Written Discourse. Intercultural Communication Studies 16: 90–98.
Zachariasiewicz, Maciej. 2019. Conflict of Laws Problems in Contracts Entered Into Between Businesses From Poland And China. Legislative Guide to Investment in Poland , eds Wan Meng, Ewa Rott-Pietrzyk, Rafał Blicharz: 150–159. Beijing, China Legal Publishing House.
Zaghloul, Ramy, Hartman, Francis. 2003. Construction contracts: the cost of mistrust. International Journal of Project Management 21 (6): 419–424.
Zhang, Mo. 2006. Chinese Contract Law. Theory and Practice . Leiden, Boston, Brill Nijhoff.
Zhao, Jun. 2010. The Puzzle of “Freedom of Contract” In China’s Contract Law. ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law 17: 105–126.
Zweigert, Konrad, Kötz, Hein. 1998. An introduction to Comparative Law. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
31.12.2020
How to Cite
Rott-Pietrzyk, E. . (2020). Trust and reasonable expectations in contracts — values that always matter (from the perspective of Polish private law). Pravovedenie, 64(4), 458–482. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu25.2020.402
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Articles of "Pravovedenie" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.
