New EU legislative instruments concerning contracts for the sale of goods and supply of digital content
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu25.2020.202Abstract
On the 20th of May 2019, the European legislator adopted new Directives on the sale of goods and supply of digital content, which determine the vector of future contract law development in the European Union. Directive 2019/770 on certain aspects concerning contracts for the supply of digital content and digital services, and Directive 2019/771 on certain aspects concerning contracts for the sale of goods are the first steps in adapting European private law to the requirements of the digital economy. The article discusses the reasons and preconditions for the adoption of new Directives. The authors, making a historical excursion of the harmonization of European contract law, demonstrate the continuity of the new Directives’ norms of European tradition on the basis of Principles of European Contract Law, Acquis Principles, Draft Common Frame of Reference, Common European Sales Law and Directive 1999/44/EC on certain aspects of the sale of consumer goods and associated guarantees. The advantages and disadvantages of the selected full harmonization in new Directives are examined. The legislative freedom granted to European Union Member States on certain issues related to contractual relations for the sale of goods and the supply of digital content are analyzed. The authors pay considerable attention to the disclosure of major legislative novelties related to contractual relations for the sale of goods and the supply of digital content, in particular the conformity of goods (digital content), and requirements for conformity; the seller’s (trader’s) duty to ensure that the consumer is informed of and supplied with updates that are necessary to keep those goods (digital content) in conformity; the burden of proof; data monetization; remedies for lack of conformity of goods (digital content). The problem of the hierarchy of remedies for lack of conformity of goods in a circular economy, such as repair and replacement, is also touched upon. The authors draw attention to the fact that taking into account the peculiarities of the circular economy and in order to determine the disproportion of the chosen method of legal protection, it is necessary to enshrine in legislation on the sale of goods the requirement to take into account its impact on the environment.
Keywords:
contract for the sale of goods, contract for the supply of digital content, European contract law, full harmonization, conformity of goods, data monetization
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Bar von, Christian, Clive, Eric, Schulte-Nölke, Hans (eds). 2008. Principles, definitions and mod- el rules of European private law. Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR outline edition) . Munich, Sellier.
Busch, Christoph. 2018. Does the Amazon Dash Button violate EU consumer law? Balancing consumer protection and technological innovation in the Internet of things. Journal of European Consumer and Market Law 2: 78–80.
Carvalho, Jorge Morais. 2019. Sale of goods and supply of digital content and digital services — overview of Directives 2019/770 and 2019/771. Journal of European Consumer and Market Law 8 (5): 194–201.
Durovic, Mateja. 2019. Bright future for EU consumer law? Journal of European Consumer and Market Law 6: 217–218.
Efroni, Zohar. 2020. Gaps and opportunities: the rudimentary protection for “data-paying consumers” under new EU consumer protection law. Common Market Law Review 57 (3): 799–829.
Eggers, William D, Hamill, Rob, Ali, Abed. 2013. Data as currency. Deloitte Review. Available at: https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/deloitte-review/issue-13/data-as-the-new-curren- cy.html (accessed: 31.07.2020).
Ferrari, Franco (ed.). 2008. The CISG and its impact on national legal systems. Munich, Sellier.
Franceschi, Alberto De. 2015. The EU digital single market strategy in light of the consumer rights Directive. Journal of European Consumer and Market Law 4: 144–148.
Franceschi, Alberto De. 2016. European contract law and the digital single market: current issues and new perspectives. European contract law and the digital single market — the implications of the digital revolution, ed. by Alberto De Franceschi, 1–18. Cambridge, Intersentia.
Goanta, Catalina, Mulders, Stephan. 2019. Move fast and break things: unfair commercial practices and consent on social media. Journal of European Consumer and Market Law 4: 136–146.
Grundmann, Stefan. 2003. Consumer Law, Commercial Law, Private Law: How can the Sales Directive and the Sales Convention be so similar? European Business Law Review 14 (3): 237–257.
Grundmann, Stefan. 2013. The EU Consumer Rights Directive: optimizing, creating alternatives, or a dead end. Uniform Law Review 18 (1): 98–127.
Gulijk, Stéphanie van, Hulstijn, Joris. 2018. Ensuring data protection by private law contract monitoring: a legal and value-based approach. European Review of Contract Law 26 (5): 635–659.
Helberger, Natali, Zuiderfeen, Frederik, Borgesius, Zuiderveen, Reyna, Agustin. 2017. The perfect match? A closer look at the relationship between EU consumer law and data protection law. Common Market Law Review 54 (5): 1427–1465.
Howells, Geraint, Twigg-Flesner, Christian, Wilhelmsson, Thomas. 2018. Rethinking EU Consumer Law. Abingdon, New York, Routledge.
Howells, Geraint. 2016. Reflections on remedies for lack of conformity in light of the proposals of the EU commission on supply of digital content and online and other distance sales of goods. European contract law and the digital single market — the implications of the digital revolution, ed. by Alberto De Franceschi, 145–162. Cambridge, Intersentia.
Izquierdo Grau, Guillem. 2020. Where should the consumer make goods available to the seller to bring them into conformity? An appraisal of Directive (EU) 2019/771. Journal of European Consumer and Market Law 1: 31–34.
Kalamees, Piia, Sein, Karin. 2019. Connected consumer goods: who is liable for defects in the ancillary digital service? Journal of European Consumer and Market Law 1: 13–22.
Kruisinga, Sonja A. 2001. What do consumer and commercial sales law have in common? A comparison of EC Directive on consumer sales law and the UN Convention on contracts for the international sale of goods. European Review of Private Law 9 (2–3): 178–188.
Lehmann, Matthias. 2016. A question of coherence. The Proposals on EU contract rules on digital content and online sales. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 23 (5): 752– 774.
Loos, Marco. 2012. Full Harmonization as a regulatory concept and its consequences for the national legal orders. The example of the consumer rights Directive. Vollharmonisierung im Europdischen Verbraucherrecht, ed. by Michael Stürner, 47–98. Munich, Sellier.
Luzak, Joasia. 2018. Digital age: time to say goodbye to traditional concepts. Journal of European Consumer and Market Law 4: 133–135.
MсCollough, John. 2010. Consumer discount rates and the decision to repair or replace a durable product: a sustainable consumption issue. Journal of Economic Issues 44 (1): 183–204.
McCollough, John. 2009. Factors impacting the demand for repair services of household products: the disappearing repair trades and the throwaway society. International Journal of Consumer Studies 33 (6): 619–626.
Micklitz, Hans-W. 2019. Squaring the circle? Reconciling consumer law and the circular economy. Journal of European Consumer and Market Law 6: 229–237.
Narciso, Madalena. 2017. Gratuitous’ digital content contracts in EU consumer law. Journal of European Consumer and Market Law 5: 198–206.
Nemeth, Kristin, Carvalho, Jorge Morais. 2019. Time for a change? Product liability in the digital era. Journal of European Consumer and Market Law 4: 160–161.
Nemeth, Kristin, Carvalho, Jorge Morais. 2019. Current challenges for consumer law. Journal of European Consumer and Market Law 3: 119–121.
Patti, Francesco Paolo. 2015. The effectiveness of consumer protection in sales contracts — some observations from recent European case law. Journal of European Consumer and Market Law 5: 179–184.
Paz García Rubio, María. 2015. Non conformity of goods and digital content and its remedies. European perspectives on the Common European Sales Law, eds Javier Plaza Penadés, Luz María Martínez Velencoso, 163–181. Cham, Springer.
Podszun, Rupprecht. 2015. Procedural autonomy and effective consumer protection in sale of goods liability: Easing the burden for consumers (even if they aren’t consumers). Comment on Case C-497/13, Froukje Faber v Autobedrijf Hazet Ochten BV, Judgment of the Court of Justice (First Chamber) of 4 June 2015, ECLI:EU:C:2015:357. Journal of European Consumer and Market Law 4: 149–153.
Savin, Andrej. 2019. Harmonising Private Law in Cyberspace: The New Directives in the Digital Single Market Context. Copenhagen Business School Law Research Paper Series 19-35. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3474289 (accessed at 31.07.2020).
Schulte-Nölke, Hans, Twigg-Flesner, Christian, Ebers, Martin. 2008. EC consumer law compendium. Munich, Sellier.
Schulte-Nölke, Hans. 2015. The brave new world of EU consumer law — without consumers, or even without law? Journal of European Consumer and Market Law 4 (4): 135–139.
Schulze, Reiner, Staudenmayer, Dirk, Lohsse, Sebastian (eds). 2017. Contracts for the supply of digital content: regulatory challenges and gaps. Münster Colloquia on EU Law and the Digital Economy. Oxford, Hart Publ.; Baden-Baden, Nomos.
Schulze, Reiner, Staudenmayer, Dirk. 2016. Digital revolution — challenges for contract law. Digital revolution: challenges for contract law in practice, eds Reiner Schulze, Dirk Staudenmayer, 19–32. Oxford, Hart Publ.; Baden-Baden, Nomos.
Schulze, Reiner, Zoll, Fryderyk. 2018. European contract law. 2nd ed. Baden-Baden, Nomos; Oxford, Hart Publ.; Munich, C. H. Beck.
Schulze, Reiner. 2015. The new shape of European contract law. Journal of European Consumer and Market Law 4 (4): 139–144.
Schulze, Reiner. 2016. Supply of digital content — a new challenge for European contract law. European contract law and the digital single market — the implications of the digital revolution, ed. by Alberto De Franceschi, 127–144. Cambridge, Intersentia.
Sein, Karin. 2017. What rules should apply to smart consumer goods? Goods with embedded digital content in the borderland between the digital content Directive and “normal contract law”. Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law 8 (2). Available at: https://www.jipitec.eu/issues/jipitec-8-2-2017/4559 (accessed: 31.07.2020).
Sein, Karin. 2018. Concluding consumer contracts via smart assistants. Journal of European Consumer and Market Law 5: 179–188.
Sein, Karin. 2020. “Goods with digital elements” and the interplay with Directive 2019/771 on the sale of goods. (January 30, 2020). Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3600137; http://dx.doi. org/10.2139/ssrn.3600137 (accessed: 31.07.2020).
Smits, Jan M. 2016. New European proposals for distance sales and digital contents contracts: fit for purpose? Zeitschrift für europäisches Privatrecht 2: 319–324.
Solmecke, Christian, Vondrlik, Simon-Elias. 2013. Rechtliche Probleme bei Produkten mit serverbasierten Zusatzdiensten — Was passiert, “wenn der Kühlschrank keine Einkaufsliste mehr schreibt…” Multimedia und Recht 12: 755–760.
Staudenmayer, Dirk. 2020. The Directives on digital contracts: first steps towards the private law of the digital economy. European Review of Private Law 28 (2): 219–249.
Stucke, Maurice E., Ezrachi, Ariel. 2017. How digital assistants can harm our economy, privacy, and democracy. Berkeley Technology Law Journal 32: 1239–1299.
Terryn, Evelyne. 2019. A right to repair: towards sustainable remedies in consumer law. European review of private law 4: 851–873.
Tjong Tjin Tai, Eric. 2018. Data ownership and consumer protection. Journal of European Consumer and Market Law 4: 136–140.
Tommasi, Sara. 2020. The new deal for consumers: towards more effective protection? European Review of Private Law 28 (2): 311–331.
Tonner, Klaus, Gawel, Erik, Schlacke, Sabine, Alt, Marina, Bretschneider, Wolfgang. 2017. Gewährleistung und Garantie als Instrumente zur Durchsetzung eines nachhaltigen Produktumgangs. Verbraucher und Recht 1: 3–12.
Twigg-Flesner, Christian. 2011. “Good-Bye harmonisation by Directives, hello cross-border only regulation?” — a way forward for EU consumer contract law. European Review of Contract Law 7 (2): 235–256.
Twigg-Flesner, Christian. 2017. From REFIT to a rethink: time for fundamental EU consumer law re- form? Journal of European Consumer and Market Law 5: 185–189.
Vanherpe, Jozefien. 2020. White smoke, but smoke nonetheless: some (burning) questions regarding the Directives on sale of goods and supply of digital content. European Review of Private Law 28 (2): 251–273.
Wendehorst, Christiane. 2016. Hybride Produkte und hybrider Vertrieb. Sind die Richtlinienentwürfe vom 9. Dezember 2015 fit für den digitalen Binnenmarkt? Ein neues Vertragsrecht für den digi- talen Binnenmarkt? Zu den Richtlinienvorschlägen der Europäischen Kommission vom Dezem- ber 2015, Hrsg. Christiane Wendehorst, Brigitta Zöchling-Jud, 45–89. Vienna, Verlag Manz.
Wendehorst, Christiane. 2016. Sale of goods and supply of digital content — two worlds apart? Study for the JURI Committee. Available at: https://europarl.europa.eu/cmsdata/98774/pe%20 556%20928%20EN_final.pdf (accessed: 31.07.2020).
Wendehorst, Christiane. 2017. Consumers and the data economy. Journal of European Consumer and Market Law 1: 1–2.
Wendehorst, Christiane. 2018. Hitting the tip of the iceberg — challenges of data protection and the data economy. Journal of European Consumer and Market Law 2: 49–50.
Westphalen, Friedrich Graf von. 2018. Some thoughts on the proposed Directive on certain aspects concerning contracts for the sales of goods. Journal of European Consumer and Market Law 2: 66–74.
Wilhelmsson, Thomas. 1992. Critical studies in private law. A treatise on need-rational principles in modern law. Dordrecht, Springer.
Wilhelmsson, Thomas. 2008. Full Harmonisation of Consumer Contract Law? Zeitschrift für europäisches Privatrecht 2: 225–229.
Zoll, Fryderyk. 2012. Chapter 11. The buyer’s remedies. Common European Sales Law (CESL). Commentary, ed. by Reiner Schulze, 512. Baden-Baden, Nomos.
Zoll, Fryderyk. 2012. Problem negatywnego uzgodnienia cech rzeczy sprzedanej — w oczekiwaniu na wspólne europejskie prawo sprzedaży. Transformacje Prawa Prywatnego 2: 167–174.
Zoll, Fryderyk. 2016. The remedies in the Proposals of the online sales Directive and the Directive on the supply of digital content. Journal of European Consumer and Market Law 5 (6): 250–254.
Bertino, Lorenzo. 2018. Service contracts and EU Directive 1999/44 on consumer sales. Journal of European Consumer and Market Law 7 (5): 211–216.
Rott, Peter. 2015. Anmerkung zur Entscheidung des EuGH vom 04.06.2015, Az.: C-497/13 “Faber”. Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 14: 556–562.
Downloads
Published
02.12.2020
How to Cite
Savanets, L. M. ., & Stakhyra , A. M. . (2020). New EU legislative instruments concerning contracts for the sale of goods and supply of digital content. Pravovedenie, 64(2), 222–244. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu25.2020.202
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Articles of "Pravovedenie" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.
