Ethics, intellectual property and commercialization of cultural heritage
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu25.2020.108Abstract
The Sámi are an indigenous people residing in Sápmi, a region cutting across northern Scandinavia (Norway, Finland, Sweden) and the Kola Peninsula in Northwest Russia. This article tells the story of a Sámi sun symbol on a seventeen century drum, originally from Swedish Sápmi, that was registered as a trademark by a jewellery company in Norway called “Tana Gull and Sølvsmie AS” in 2009. The mark was invalidated in 2020 because, according to the Norwegian Intellectual Property Office, the registration of a religious symbol was likely to infringe on the rights of the Sámi, whose access to their own cultural and religious symbols should be protected. The basis for the decision was a public policy exception, a provision within trademark law excluding the registration of signs “contrary to morality or public policy”, and allowing the law into account public opinion, public interest and human rights. Analysis of this case is used to shape the debate about the role of intellectual property law in addressing the problem of overcommercialization, for example by preventing cultural misappropriation. The authors suggest that the notion of blasphemy or religious offence through banal commercialization should be more broadly formulated in interpretation of the public policy exception in order to take account of cultural misappropriation. They also argue that protecting the public domain by preventing registration of important cultural and religious symbols is not sufficient to address the problem of cultural misappropriation in a commercial context. Positive protection through trademark registrations is just as important as their defensive protection.
Keywords:
Sámi, Intangible Cultural Heritage, commercialization, cultural misappropriation, trademark, ethics, intellectual property
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Anemaet, Lotte. 2016. The Public Domain is Under Pressure — Why We Should Not Rely on Empirical Data When Assessing Trademark Distinctiveness. International Review of Intellectual Pro-perty and Competition Law: 1–33. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2749555 (accessed: 28.06.2020). DOI 10.1007/s40319-016-0459-8.
Aslaksen, Eilif Andreas. 2018. Har tatt “patent” pa den Sami ske sola. NRK Sapmi. Available at: https://www.nrk.no/Sapmi/har-tatt-_patent_-pa-den-Samiske-sola-1.13902043 (accessed: 28.06.2020).
Blaiwais, Lauren, Miller, Scott. 2018. Offensive Trademarks: The Canadian and American Perspectives. Intellectual Property Journal 30 (2): 205–215.
Bonadio, Enrico 2015. Brands, Morality and Public Policy: Some Reflections on the Ban on Registration of Controversial Marks. Marques Intellectual Property Law Review 19: 39–61.
Bortolotto, Chiara 2020. Intangible Cultural Heritage and the Market: The Embarrassment of Heritage Alienability. Unpublished paper.
Deacon, Harriet, Smeets, Rieks. 2018. Intangible Heritage Safeguarding and Intellectual Property Protection in the context of implementing the UNESCO ICH Convention. Safeguarding Intangible Heritage, eds N. Akagawa, L. Smith: 36–53. London, Routledge.
Geiger, Christophe, Izyumenko, Elena. 2020. Shaping Intellectual Property Rights Through Human Rights Adjudication: The Example of the European Court of Human Rights. Centre for International Intellectual Property Studies (CEIPI) Research Paper No. 2020-02. . Mitchell Hamline Law Review 46 (3). Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3613591 or https://open.mitchellhamline.edu/mhlr/vol46/iss3/3 (accessed: 28.06.2020).
Geiger, Christophe, Pontes, Leonardo Machado. 2017. Trade mark registration, public policy, morality and fundamental rights. Centre for International Intellectual Property Studies Research Paper No. 2017-01. Available at: https://www.ip.mpg.de/en/publications/details/trade-markregistration-public-policy-morality-and-fundamental-rights.html (accessed 08.07.2021).
Guttorm, Gunvor. 2019. Traditions and Traditional Knowledge in the Sami Culture. Being Indigenous: Perspectives on Activism, Culture, Language and Identity, ed. by Neyooxet Greymorning: 65–75. London, New York, Routledge.
Joy, Francis 2018. Sami Shamanism, Cosmology and Art as Systems of Embedded Knowledge. Doctoral Dissertation. Acta Universitatis Lapponiensis 367. Rovaniemi, The University of Lapland. Available at: http://lauda.ulapland.fi/handle/10024/63178 (accessed: 28.06.2020).
Joy, Francis. 2020. The Importance of the Sun Symbol in the Restoration of Sami Spiritual Traditions and Healing Practice. Religions 11 (6): 270–292.
Liu, Wenqi. 2017. Protection of Religious Signs under Trademark Law: A Perspective of China’s Practice. . Religions 8 (11): 246–259.
Lixinski, Lucas, 2018. Intangible heritage economics and the law: listing, commodification and market alienation. Safeguarding Intangible Heritage, eds N. Akagawa, L. Smith: 54–67. London, Routledge.
Lixinski, Lucas, 2020. Commercializing Traditional Culture: Promises and Pitfalls in the Convergence of Intellectual Property Law and Cultural Heritage Law. . Annali italiani del diritto d’autore, della cultura e dello spettacolo (AIDA). (Forthcoming)
Lundmark, Bo 1985. They consider the sun to be a mother to all living creatures. Saami Pre-Christian Religion: studies on the oldest traces of religion among the Saami, eds Louise Backman, Ake Huldtkrantz. Stockholm, Almqvist & Wiksell International.
Manker, Ernst Mauritz. 1938. . Die Lappische Zaubertrommel: Eeine Ethnologische Monographie. Vol. 1, Die Trommel als Denkmal Materieller Kultur. Acta Lapponica 1. Stockholm, Thule.
Manker, Ernst Mauritz. 1950. . Die Lappische Zaubertrommel: Eine Ethnologische Monographie. Vol. 2, Die Trommel als Urkunde Geistigen Lebens. Acta Lapponica 6. Stockholm, Gebers.
Mattila, Tuomas 2018. Needs of the Sami people for intellectual property protection from the viewpoint of copyright and trademarks — especially with regard to duodji-handicrafts and the Sami dresses. Finland: Publications of the Ministry of Education and Culture 40. Available at: http://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/161206 (accessed: 28.06.2020).
Mattila, Tuomas. 2021. Trademark protection of traditional cultural expressions of Sami people in Finland. Nordiskt Immateriellt Rattsskydd 2. Available at: https://www.nir.nu/en/argang/2021 (accessed 08.07.2021)
Minde, Henry. 2005. Assimilation of the Sami — Implementation and Consequences. . Aboriginal Policy Research Consortium International (APRCi) . Available at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/aprci/196(accessed: 28.06.2020).
Pak, Jimmy. 2011. Re-imagining the Wheel: Seeking a Feasible International Regime to Protect Indigenous Cultural Expressions Through Trademark Law. Pacific McGeorge Global Business & Development Law Journal 24: 381–409.
Phillips, Victoria F. 2017 Beyond trademark: the Washington Redskins case and the search for dignity. . Chicago-Kent Law Review 92 (2017): 1061–1086.
Reingraber, Tom. 2012. Public order and morality as grounds for refusal within trademark law: European and comparative approach. Unpublished Masters thesis. Brussel, Hogeschool-Universiteit. Available at: https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/54532/DINESH-T---Masters-Thesis.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed: 28.06.2020).
Richardson, Megan, Thomas, Julian, Klein, Jill. 2019. From “Oomoo” to “Oro”: nostalgia labels and cultural policy on the Australian trade marks register. The Object and Purpose of Intellectual Property, ed. by S. Frankel: 7–29. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publ.
Rimmer, Matthew, 2017. . Indigenous Intellectual Property: A Handbook of Contemporary Research. Research Handbooks in Intellectual Property. Cheltenham (UK), Northampton (Mass.), Edward Elgar.
Rinallo, Diego, Borghini, Stefania, Bamossy, Gary, Kozinets, Robert V. 2012. When sacred objects go B®a(n)d. Consumption and spirituality 29 (41): 29–40.
Rydving, Hakan. 1991. The Saami drums and the religious encounter in the 17th and 18th centuries. . Scripta Instituti Donneriani Aboensis 14, 28–51. https://doi.org/10.30674/scripta.67195.
Saez, Catherine. 2018. Indigenous Knowledge Misappropriation: The Case Of The Zia Sun Symbol Explained At WIPO. Intellectual Property Watch. Available at: https://www.ip-watch.org/2018/12/11/indigenous-knowledge-misappropriation-case-zia-sun-symbol-explainedwipo (accessed: 28.06.2020).
Schovsbo, Jens, Riis, Thomas, 2018. Public Policy Limitations of Trade Mark Subject Matter — An EU Perspective. Working paper. . Social Science Research Network (SSRN), May 31. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3188013 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3188013 (accessed: 28.06.2020).
Senftleben, Martin. 2013. Public Domain Preservation in EU Trademark Law — A Model for Other Regions? . The Trademark Reporter 103 (4): 775–827. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2331598 (accessed: 28.06.2020).
Shrumm, Regan. 2017. Knitting for our Lives: The Appropriation of Cowichan Sweaters by the Hudson’s Bay During the 2010 Vancouver Olympics. ARTiculate 2 (2): 120–161.
Silven, Eva. 2012. Contested Sami Heritage: Drums and sieidis on the Move, in National Museums and the Negotiation of Difficult Pasts. EuNaMus Report 8, eds Poulot, Dominique, Guiral, Jose Maria Lanzarote and Bodenstein, Felicity: 173–186. Linkoping, Linkoping University Electronic Press.
Solbakk, John Trygve. 1990. The Sami People. Karasjok, Norway, Sami Institute.
Solbakk, John Trygve. 2007. Samisk mytologi og folkemedisin [Sami Mythology and Folk Medicine]. Tradisjonell kunnskap og opphavsrett, ed. by John Trygve Solbakk. Karasjok: Callidlagadus and Sami kopiia (online). Available at: http://www.Samikopiija.org/web/index.php?sladja=7&giella1=nor (accessed: 28.06.2020).
Sommarstrom, Bo. 1991. The Saami Shaman’s drum and the star horizons. Scripta Instituti Donneriani Aboensis 14, 136–168. https://doi.org/10.30674/scripta.67201.
Tavares, Pedro Silveira, Ziemer, Alysa Arcos, Randazza, Marc John 2019. Morality and Trademarks: The South American Approach. ip-iurisdictio 19 August 2019. Available at: https://ip-iurisdictio.org/morality-and-trademarks-the-south-american-approach (accessed: 28.06.2020).
Turner, Stephanie B. 2012. The case of the Zia: looking beyond trademark law to protect sacred symbols. Student Scholarship Papers. Paper 124. Available at: http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1124&context=student_papers (accessed: 28.06.2020).
Udy, Vanessa. 2015. The Appropriation of Aboriginal Cultural Heritage: Examining the Uses and Pitfalls of the Canadian Intellectual Property Regime. Intellectual Property Issues in Cultural Heritage (IPinCH) blog. Available at: https://www.sfu.ca/ipinch/outputs/blog/canadian-intellectual-property-regime (accessed: 28.06.2020).
Von Bomhard, Verena, Von Muhlendahl, Alexander. 2018. Concise European Trade Mark Law. The Netherlands, Wolters Kluwer, Alphen aan den Rijn.
Zark, Brian. 2015. Use of Native American Tribal Names as Marks. American Indian Law Journal 3 (2). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/ailj/vol3/iss2/7 (accessed: 28.06.2020).
Ziemer, Alysa Arcos, Tavares, Pedro Silveira, Randazza, Marc John. 2017. Morality and Trademarks: The South American Approach. Suffolk Transnational Law Review 40 (2): 221–278.
Downloads
Published
30.11.2020
How to Cite
Deacon, H. J. (2020). Ethics, intellectual property and commercialization of cultural heritage. Pravovedenie, 64(1), 93–111. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu25.2020.108
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Articles of "Pravovedenie" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.
